Sentences with phrase «argument against anyone»

Anyone who make's an argument against anyone or any idea by simply calling others idiot, is truly lacking any real ability to articulate logical reason for their opposition.

Not exact matches

I see the argument against the term «atheist,» but I don't like «non-believer,» either, because I believe in lots of things — science, truth, empathy, the power of creativity, etc — just not in anyone's god (s).

Perhaps one of the most convincing arguments against religion is how nasty, hateful, vindictive and arrogant believers are when it comes to dealing with anyone who doesn't follow their cult, and how defensive and dismissive they become when you start asking probing, difficult to answer questions.

I have yet to hear anyone articulate a reasonable argument against same - sx marriage.

The argument against gay marriage isn't that it has a harmful effect to anyone else but instead that it is against certain religious beliefs.

Rarely do I see anyone in these comments actually make a reasonable argument against it's teachings.

Churches and pastors who participate in miracles and prophecies don't like to be told that they are being controlled by the devil, and so they often counter with the argument that anyone who says that something is of the devil when it is actually from God is committing a blasphemous sin against the Holy Spirit and will never be forgiven of such a sin.

The argument is devastating, for it applies with greater force against Hezekiah than anyone else.

Though it is entirely legitimate for a scientist, or anyone else, to present philosophical or theological arguments against naturalistic evolution, it can not properly be claimed that such arguments are themselves scientific ones.

Paul's arguments about the place of the law are not directed against Jews who follow the law, but against anyone who would insist that gentiles must follow Torah to he saved.

I will join anyone in railing against guilty parties like Theta Tau and the people who made that video, but I will always fight back against the «paying for friends» argument because, just like many other things in life, not everything is free, and sometimes if you want to affiliate with people who share similar interests as you, it costs money.

Anyone who puts Up an argument against a tactic or an issue shud b an example frst.one can't just say hey ure doin it wrong do it ds other way witout having proof of succeeding at it.at ur job ure experienced dan mi so for mi to convince u to do otherwise I must show u proof of wer it's worked before or when I dd it mysef

Its not as if this argument is correct, but there is something truthful, saddening and quite painful about it... Anyone remember the FA cup final loss against a full squad Chelsea?

Their arguments against the use of chlorine - bleached products are so convincing that one is astonished that the manufacturers keep putting them on the market, that governments continue to permit it, and that anyone in - their right mind would now use such products.

However, I feel I must respond to Laura and to anyone who read Laura's comment and thought it was a compelling argument against parents raising their children as vegetarians.

This idea that anyone who stands against Labour must therefore be pro-Tory uses such obviously false logic that it is almost embarrassing to hear it and yet it is an argument you hear Labour using time and time again.

«This is too logical a transition for anyone to have an ideological argument against clean energy, because it stands against economic growth and good business sense,» says Daniel Kammen, professor of energy at the University of California, Berkeley, and science envoy for the U.S. State Department, who is attending the talks, «That's what people are saying here — they're incredulous that anyone would want to back off on this.»

There is no compelling legal, moral, or ethical argument against keeping your hormones wherever you want them, and anyone who tries to tell you otherwise does not have your best interests at heart.

Anyone who thinks the movie takes a stand either for or against gun control or that it makes reasonable arguments for that stand is reaching.

Oh Ken Nunn, didn't anyone ever tell you that when you devolve into name calling, it means you're defensive because the argument you're fighting against is valid?

This isn't specifically directed at anyone here, but I've never really heard an argument against digital comics that goes beyond «I like the way comics feel and smell and oh the experience and OH MY GOD YES YES PRINT I LOVE IT.»

With 2010 over, we now have 16 observations starting in 1995, and (unsurprisingly to anyone who followed the argument thus far) the upward trend is now statistically significant at the 5 per cent level [1] That is, if climate change since 1995 (the time of the first IPCC report, and well after Lindzen announced himself as a sceptic) had been purely random, the odds against such an upward trend would be better than 20 to 1 against.

It is difficult to see how anyone can argue against it, and it provides a means to unite people from both sides of the argument.