The key
argument against charging a fixed price for a case is, of course, cases are so variable.
Not exact matches
Pruitt himself has played up this
argument, claiming that the corruption
charges against him are intended «to attack and derail the president's agenda.»
Most significantly, Duddington argues
against the
charge that permitting an increasing role for religion in the legal and political (i.e., public) spheres would necessitate the imposition of one system of belief upon another, by re-emphasising the
argument that Christianity does not serve to generate a moral code, but rather provides a vehicle through which it may be discovered.
Shalom's
argument against the former relies on Grice's notion of «present total temporary states,» Shalom totally includes memory as an element in a «present total temporary state» and within this context
charges that «what is called «memory» necessarily ceases to possess the property of «pastness» which is associated with memory» and required by Hartshorne's theory.
It seems that there are further basic
arguments which Hartshorne could level
against Craighead's claim,
charging, for example, that it is a fallacy of composition to assert that because we can conceive of the nonexistence of some things we can conceive of the nonexistence of all things.4 Craighead has in fact anticipated that fallacy
charge as it applies in this issue (ECCC 122f).
His criticisms are weak and chooses to not discuss my
arguments, merely dismissing them, while he continues to assert unfounded critical
charges against GES types.
A heated
argument insued, Blair cried and then CALLED THE COPS ON ME for threatening to press fraud
charges against the school - who clearly fraudulently
charged my bank account for services not rendered!
«I think the oral
arguments today clearly outline the baseline and political nature of the
charges against me,» Ortt told reporters after the hearing.
«I think the oral
arguments today clearly outline the baseless and political nature of the
charges against me,» said Ortt, R - 62nd District.
But on October 30, the appeal court dismissed the
argument of Saraki that the CCT was not a court of competent jurisdiction to handle the criminal
charges preferred
against him.
A judge rejected the selective prosecution
argument in refusing to dismiss
charges against Maziarz.
Without indicating what action he might take in the Ivy case, Soares insisted he was working to prevent a defense attorney from raising a potentially disastrous legal
argument against any district attorney who might bring
charges in a case that falls into what Soares characterized as the executive order's ample ambiguities.
The corruption
charges against State Senator Malcolm Smith and City Councilman Dan Halloran are a prime
argument for non-partisan elections, Mayor Bloomberg said.
It is up to the court to decide and there are several
arguments you can use
against a
charging order being made.
When in - court
arguments began, Atari pressed two separate lines of defense
against Nintendo's
charge that the Tetris rights they claimed to own were ill - gotten.
Or is Paul defending
against the
charge by making a numbers
argument — the scientists in question are on the same side as the consensus, so to challenge any aspect of global warming science or politics is to make a statement about «the majority of scientists» (many of whom are in fact social scientists)?
To some extent, this
argument echoes what Exxon lawyers say to defend it
against charges that it should have warned its own investors about the risks of global warming.
The point of Milton Friedman's
arguments against public utility commission law was to prevent forcing customers to commit to funding the cost of investment over 40 to 50 years in mandatory rate base
charges.
The law doesn't say what methods of creating this apprehension are illegal; therefore you can make an
argument that a threat
against you in someone's blog is enough to have the author
charged with a crime.
It is hard to argue
against the idea that lawyers should be
charged for excess costs that they impose on others by making
arguments that are without substantial justification.
The appeal judge rejected all of those
arguments because the employer was a «substantial corporation» (two facilities with a total of 770 people) that was «within a broader group of companies»; the employer had been found guilty on three
charges under the OHSA; it was proper to consider the prior conviction (which was in 2004); and the harm to the injured worker was «devastating»: he was rendered a paraplegic when a robot on which he was doing a «quick fix» pressed
against him on his back.
Consequently, what also doesn't matter within the Competition Bureau's
argument and pleadings, is the relativity of the amount of any commissions that may be
charged against the value of the actual property being sold, nor does the potential that a Buyer may pay far too much for a property, or that a Seller may not receive enough.
The Brokerage's first
argument was that it did not receive adequate notice of the
charges against it because the complaint did not contain specific factual allegations but instead only cited the rules the Brokerage had allegedly violated and attached a copy of the advertisment.