Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main
argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.
Not exact matches
Yet to the degree that there are many in the markets who share a similar line of thinking, it's worth registering that if you own
gold, this profile and
argument is essentially what you're betting
against.
In these instances, I try to use the US dollar's performance
against gold to prove the
argument that the US dollar will not have to crash in the future to prove my point because it has already crashed!
You could make an
argument for 5 % in
gold as a good diversifier — although I'd argue
against it as compounding will become a huge factor for your son later in life and
gold doesn't pay dividends.
When I last wrote about
gold, I discussed the
argument for
gold as a potential hedge
against volatility.