Sentences with phrase «argument against human»

If you can't tell me anything, then what does that say about your argument against human caused climate change?

By the way, the inimitable Benny Peiser (an anthropologist, whose CCNET emphasizes any argument against human responsibility for change in climate) has a page out on the recent thermohaline info.

At present, the main argument against human cloning is that occasional difficulties observed in cloning other animals suggest that human clones would sometimes be born with medical abnormalities.

This lack of correlation is one of the chief arguments against a human driver.

Not exact matches

A thorough review of the arguments for and against abstinence programs in Uganda specifically is available on the Human Rights Watch website.

Despite some of his protests against the Reformed, Dawson's fundamental convictions about the social nature of the human person resonates with Abraham Kuyper's argument that the organic nature of life is the foundation of the social or ecclesial organisms that come after it.

Though he verbally defended the old New England idea, it is interesting that he defended it more on the basis of reason and human rights than on the basis of Scripture, and this defense of congregational independence later provided arguments for advocates of the revolution against England.

Assuming the truth of contingency in human affairs, McCabe marshaled two primary arguments against divine foreknowledge.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

Reno develops several lines of argument against the view that respect for human dignity is consistent with, let alone requires, that liberty be understood as the individual's projection of the self onto the universe.

The most sophisticated theological argument against the conviction that some human beings in fact go to hell has been proposed by Hans Urs von Balthasar in his book Dare We Hope «That All Men Be Saved?»

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

George's arguments in principle against coerced religious practice succeed only if he can establish the distinctiveness of religion as an aspect of human fulfillment.

Their pragmatic arguments for the long - term value of species will be weighted against pragmatic arguments for the immediate needs of some human beings.

The idea about having to have human like beingS, visable or invisible, manipulate things to prove intelligence, is the underlying fallacy of any argument against an intelligent universe.

Like I said before using «human logic» is an inappropriate argument for or against God and scripture.

The argument against neo-Darwinism begins from the undoubted observation that many features of living beings, like the bacterial flagellum or the human eye, are the result of not one genetic mutation but of a large number of such mutations.

Certainly no argument against it can be based upon the fact that every year we are able to move faster from one point to another, and to destroy more human lives with less expenditure of time and trouble.

Republican arguments against higher taxes are premised in deeply faulty views of both human nature and economics.

This is the same argument that Robert Mugabe used to suppress the human rights of LGBT people in Zimbabwe; that the former president of Nigeria, Goodluck Jonathan, used when he signed the most dangerous law against LGBT people in the modern world; and that President Yoweri Museveni used in a ceremonial signing of the anti-gay bill in Uganda.

Tina Hesman Saey covered researchers» arguments for and against this type of genetic engineering in «Editing human germline cells debated» (SN: 5/30/15, p. 16).

Considering that it was the natural human diet for around 2.5 millions years of evolution, there's not much of an argument against the Paleo diet being correct and healthy for everyone on the planet.

The previous 5 movies were mostly filled with relationship building and power acceptance and arguments between themselves with pockets of fights against humans / sentinels / lesser mutants dotting the narrative.

e.g. the Human eye, trees, Human body etc. and resources on Natural disasters, plate tectonics etc. that can be used to argue against the design argument.

Arguments for and against that can be used to plan an answer to the exam question «Advances in medical technology should be used for the benefit of humans».

An argument against dogs being omnivores is that they have shorter small intestines than species such as humans.

Dr. Clare Palmer, the philosopher, had also just published a chapter on the conflicts about TNR vs. trap and euthanize, and how human values lead to the arguments for and against each option.

A valuable short paper that has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters (subscription required) makes a strong case against presenting any argument about human - driven global warming that's based on short - term trends (a decade or so).

The most common argument (or point of disbelief) that I hear against AGW is that humans can not possibly affect something as vast as the global weather.

But the advisers were equally critical of what they called «contrarian» arguments against significant human - caused climate change.

The guests in the series ranged from Joe Romm, «America's fiercest climate blogger,» to Richard Lindzen, the climatologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who has been variously lionized and pilloried for his arguments against science pointing to a dangerous human influence on climate.

While I think there are ample arguments against the proposition that the human influence on climate is of any significant magnitude, I don't think it is likely that there is sufficient data at this time to claim to prove that there is no miniscule such influence.

Fred, I go by what I read: to invite you to develop a reasoned and lightly referenced argument for and against the proposition highlighted in the extract below — «the null hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof on showing that there is no human influence»... Both essays would be written «blind» — i.e., without seeing the others» essay — They do not state what the null hypothesis is.

Putting up «sea level rise since 1961» as an argument either for or against human effects on the climate is a joke.

Some of the arguments against climate change policies based upon scientific uncertainty should and can be responded to on scientific grounds especially in light of the fact that many claims about scientific uncertainty about human - induced warming are great distortions of mainstream climate change science.

... that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.

Ethical Problems With Cost Arguments Against Climate Change Policies: Increased Costs May Not Justify Human Rights Violations

Ultimately Becker's is an argument against progress, because pretty much all human activity is geo - engineering.

The strongest argument against decoupling as a pathway towards a sustainable human future isn't that it's impossible, as Hickel claims, but that it isn't occurring quickly enough to prevent unacceptable environmental impacts.

Can you look at their numbers?Wackos Grasping At Straws In their attempts to make a case against the science of climate change, the far - right has seized on the argument that «humans are CO2 factories.»

I find it interesting that Monbiot has utter faith in research financed by Big Oil, though of course no sane human being would believe that the source of funding for research is a valid argument for or against the truth of the findings, would they?

Anthony's expertise has also been recognised by the Legal 500 2017 edition, where he is recommended as a Leading Silk in Band 2 in crime as «a well - prepared, thorough and engaging advocate — his legal arguments are consistently impressive» and as a Leading Silk in Band 3 in the civil liberties and human rights category as being «well known in the field, especially in claims against the police.»

The primary argument I have heard against this principle is the contention that future machines will have the capacity for discrimination and will be more moral in their choices and actions than human soldiers.