Sentences with phrase «argument against impact»

Not exact matches

The latest economic impacts of the pipeline constraints come amid an intensifying spat between Alberta and British Columbia over the construction of the Trans Mountain project, pitting arguments of economic impact against the importance of protecting coastlines and limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

The «bank for central banks» has released a paper on the possible impact of state - issued cryptocurrencies, as well as arguments for and against the introduction of such monetary instruments.

Instead of deconstructing the specifics of the arguments against plastic and packaging, we should recognise the impact that we are having on the planet and that packaging plays a part within that.

The tobacco industry is using the same tired arguments against plain packaging as with smokefree law — namely that it would have a major impact on small businesses like me.

It looks at the Christian belief on the subject and the argument for and against from different churches, the Buddist view on the subject and the impact and consequences of abortion.

Charter school policy discussions often devolve into political battles that pit advocates armed with competing research studies against one another in arguments over academic impact.

Although we can not predict specific impacts of geoengineering with much confidence, we can fruitfully consider the conditions under which geoengineering research would be justified (or not), and ethical theory provides a wealth of resources to sift through the value judgments that arguments for (or against) research inevitably involve.

The argument against this should be obvious, such a small group may be non-representative of regional temperature changes, and instead reflective of other environmental factors that impacted the individual trees and groups of trees.

These questions are organized according to the most frequent arguments made against climate change policies which are claims that climate change policies: (a) will impose unacceptable costs on a national economy or specific industries or prevent nations from pursuing other national priorities, (b) should not be adopted because of scientific uncertainty about climate change impacts, or (c) are both unfair and ineffective as long as high emitting nations such as China or India do not adopt meaningful ghg emissions reduction policies.

Again and again proponents of action on climate change have responded to economic arguments against taking action to reduce the threat of climate change by making counter economic arguments such as climate change policies will produce new jobs or reduce adverse economic impacts that will follow from the failure to reduce the threat of climate change.

The strongest argument against decoupling as a pathway towards a sustainable human future isn't that it's impossible, as Hickel claims, but that it isn't occurring quickly enough to prevent unacceptable environmental impacts.

However I do think that there a number of arguments that speak against an important anthropogenic contribution to observed temperatures changes in the past century: - The 1910 - 1945 allegedly unprecedented warming, in spite of the small impact of GHGs at the time.

The MICRA unconstitutionality argument was long ago decided against attorney, with the appellate court determining nothing had changed to dissuade it from giving stare decisis impact to Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc., 37 Cal.3 d 920, 923 (1985).