Sentences with phrase «argument against my post»

Any argument against my post would be completely irrational.

There is no argument against your post.

Not exact matches

Jurors are expected to hear closing arguments today in the trial for former pro wrestler Hulk Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker Media over a sex tape featuring Hogan that Gawker posted online.

To better understand the arguments for / against convertible equity I suggest you read my posts on those topics:

The late Isaac Asimov presented the best argument against it I've yet found, and I'll post it here.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

In fact, today I had planned to write a post speaking out against tentative plans in the Tennessee legislature to adopt immigration policies similar to those that caused such controversy in Arizona, basing my argument on the inherent worth of our Hispanic neighbors.

It may indeed seem that what I have done so far is to offer a tentative argument against the claims of an exemplarist interpretation of Christ's work, namely, that if he is offered us as an exemplar his experience is in crucial respects too relative and limited to offer a wholly significant guide - post to men and women in all the circumstances of their lives.

Rather than being an ordered argument against visionary thinking in the church, it is a kind of crazy quilt of my posts and cartoons related to the topic.

But then again, I guess personal attacks is a argument of sorts... just to let you know I'm about 10 lbs overweight so you can use that against me next time you post against me!

some of your posts have been straw men arguments against total depravity that are real easy for you knock down and in reality the text has nothing to do with inability and no Calvinist believes it either

this blog is not working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific method argument; it is consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.

I posted this a week ago to my personal blog and intended to cross-post it here without too much delay, but I've just realized that I never got around to it.There's a particularly bad argument against those who accept the biblical prohibitions against same - sex sexual acts, and I think I've....

If someone is, please post (the best argument I've seen is that he's not playing Renfroe over Pirela and that even though Renfroe sucks against righties, he needs a lot of chances to show he can hit them — I happen to think Green is right on Renfroe).

This is probably the best and fairest argument against LeBron that has been posted here.

I posted something to that effect in another earlier thread but to see various arguments only bubble up because the player in focus is «political»... it's transparent that method and decorum are incidental to the outrage against it.

PS: Don't get me wrong, I respect the fact that you post your optimistic yet contrarian views on here despite all the evidence that keep stacking up as an argument against optimism.

Reading everybody's posts and arguments for and against Wenger, Kroenke and Gazidis has at times made me laugh, cry, bitter and angry to the point of pulling out what hair i have left.

Legislators considering changing their divorce laws should consider the full range of legal options available to them, such as those compiled by Americans for Divorce Reform and posted on their Internet «Divorce Reform Page «69 This site presents arguments for and against the initiatives as well as model legislation.

Although this may be a good argument against mandatory voting, I'm afraid that this post does not fully answer the question.

What I don't really see is how the Labour party holding three pilots in this Parliament, or even selecting all of its candidates in some form of primary at the next election or the time after would make any really significant difference to arguments for or against first - past - the - post, the Alternative Vote, AV +, AMS, STV and various hybrids thereof.

Sunder: In the interests of intellectual strictness I have qualified the comment about the lack of intellectual and moral case against PR to refer specifically to the two lines of argument featured in the post.

This post serves to be an objective counterweight to my last post — though most arguments against calorie counting (or calories in general) are unfounded, illogical, or outright nonsensical, there are some legitimate downsides that deserve thoughtful consideration.

I did want to follow up to a few of the comments from you and others on my recent post, The False Arguments of Carol Burris Against High Standards.

On its website, UTLA has posted arguments for and against the agreement.

Teleread has posted an in - depth piece on how one - star spite reviews continue to plague authors, and as usual, The Passive Voice had a ton of well - formed arguments in favor of the current review system, railing against it, and outright admitting that reviews as a concept are simply flawed.

After being fired from her post as Chief of the Special Victims Unit for refusing to «go along to get along,» Alice Vachss published the incendiary Sex Crimes, described as «a stark, passionate closing argument in [her] broader case against the criminal justice system» by the NY Times, which named it as a Notable Book of the Year.

There are arguments for and against doing this, and they're all beyond the scope of this post.

I titled this post «Why You Shouldn't Use a United Credit Card» and in the process listed many arguments against the value of these two cards» various benefits.

I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being made against your claims.

My first degree in is Physics, and I do from time to time comment directly on scientific issues, but nevertheless I think it is fair to say that the main thrust of my posted arguments against people like yourself and, indeed Nic Lewis, is more political than scientific.

Peter, as I've told you before, the blog post you linked, and the paper it references, are nothing but straw - man arguments against solar power.

Latimer, I generally agree broadly with most of your posts, but I am so heartily fed up with the «the government just wants to oppress us with tax» meme as an argument against CAGW I just feel I have to say something.

This post on a question - begging argument in favour of carbon taxes and against an emissions trading scheme, naturally raised -LRB-!)

This post accomplished a summary of the main arguments against the tree - ring based proxy reconstructions, but some people might not even know what those are.

Unless any of the many, many people who have argued against the conclusion that Jelbring's work is completely wrong and should have never been accepted in the first place wish to keep arguing, perhaps the more polite ones can concede in one last post and we can wrap this up and move on to N&Z, the «existence» of a real, live GHE, and maybe, just maybe, get to where the skeptical arguments on the list are much better informed and less likely to play fast and loose with the laws of nature or thermodynamics.

Nice One seems to be the argument through verbosity type, ignoring the details are against them and just posting falsehoods that take a little effort to see through.

In his post «Why We Shouldn't Be In a Hurry to Redefine «Climate Engineering,»» Duncan McLaren presents a thoughtful argument against the view that the two main families of potential climate engineering technologies — solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR)-- should be treated as separate and distinct groups of climate response strategies.

For readers desiring a deeper look into particular faults with the science arguments / counterarguments and aspects of the Ofcom regulation methodology, blogger analyst Steve McIntyre (of «hockey stick» analysis fame) has numerous posts in his «TGGSW», «Ofcom» and «Swindle» categories about specific complaints against the video and the fallout of Ofcom's 2008 ruling.

This post is a critical part of the wider argument against the current scientific madness.

It might be worth checking them against the actual book just to make sure they read verbatim, that's just the sort of ammunition for someone like Plimer to engage in his trademark gabbledygook so he can attack a minor error rather than answer the main thrust of the argument if he were to notice this post

The one time I tried posting at CA I had comments snipped or removed for being «offtopic» even though I was simply offering argument against claims by other commenters, which were in the same «offtopic» subject.

The NUMERATE skeptics who gave up the arguments against TOBS were JerryB who then convinced me in 2007 and I believe NicL in a post he did in the 2010 time frame somewhere on JeffIds I think it was in a comment.

The economic equivalent is the Great Depression and the boom of post WWII; both were radical swings for and against the larger trend of greater trade and prosperity for the USA from founding to today (And if one substitutes public debt to CO2 emissions and switches arguments oddly similar debates arise with the same amount of acrimony on solutions).

The earlier posts that Judith links above contain a lot of arguments for and against the existence of something like that.

We were thus happy to read Steve Matthews» recent post at the Law Firm Web Strategy blog, in which he nicely lays out the arguments for and against custom domains for law firm blogs.

Morrison's post draws from an article by Timothy Mahoney, who offers several arguments against offshoring.

The arguments against anonymous posting are compelling, in certain contexts.

Our earlier post (and see update) mentioned that Eugene Volokh had written about the contours of a constitutional right to self - defense, and now the UCLA lawprof (at the newly un-paywalled site of his Conspiracy) has sketched a possible argument against the Philly Plexiglass measure along those lines.

Detechter recently posted an article, Arguments against Social Media Marketing and Pro-Social Media Points, that elaborates both sides nicely...