It may be tempting to use this news as
an argument against vouchers, especially because the evidence is drawn from the most sophisticated research tools available to scholars who study these programs.
The other
argument against vouchers is on church / state grounds — a concern that the current Supreme Court doesn't share, and one that I've always found utterly irrational.
Voucher programs that affect only a fraction of students do leave others behind, but that is not
an argument against vouchers; it is an argument in favor of a voucher plan that is comprehensive.
Using scholarship, reasoning and facts, Berliner and Glass frame compelling, scholarly
arguments against vouchers, charter schools, high - stakes testing, and school choice.
Think about it in terms of some of
the arguments against vouchers that were mentioned this morning, particularly by Steve Green, but others: For example, the argument that religious schools should be excluded in order to protect the taxpayer's right not to fund religious schools.
Not exact matches
With Donald Trump in the White House and long - time school choice advocate Betsy DeVos installed as his education secretary,
arguments for and
against vouchers and scholarship tax credits are burning white hot.
In addition to legal challenges, opponents of special education
vouchers are beginning to advance political and educational
arguments against the idea as new programs are being considered in states such as Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and South Carolina, and the existing Ohio program is poised to expand.
Although he voted
against legislation that would permit a
voucher experiment in Washington, D.C., he has since said, in perhaps an unguarded moment, «If there was any
argument for
vouchers, it was «Alright, let's see if this experiment works,» and if it does, then whatever my preconceptions, my attitude is you do what works for the kids.»
One key
argument has been raised
against the movement for school choice: that schools of choice, whether created through charter alternatives or through
voucher programs, will undermine the common culture.
Marion Superior Court Judge Michael Keele decided not to halt the program because
arguments against it — namely, the
vouchers violate the separation of church and state by using public money to fund religious schools — are unlikely to succeed at trial.
Since the program was created two years ago, the majority of students receiving
vouchers were already attending private schools, which has served as the basis for critics»
arguments against expansion.
The
argument for and
against vouchers is very similar to that of charters.
The most effective
argument against expanding Wisconsin's statewide
voucher program is how much it could cost, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke said Monday.
You have in your packet a blue sheet that gives you the order of the day, so I won't belabor that too much, but I will just remind you that we're going to start out with a session on history this morning; then go to a lunchtime segment that will focus on some of the relevant federal constitutional issues, including evaluations of the federal attacks on and defenses of the Blaine amendments; then we will finish off the day with a session that will focus on litigation strategy related to these amendments and some of the
arguments being made for and
against them in that litigation, as well as a focus on how debates over faith - based initiatives and school
vouchers are affected by these particular state constitutional restrictions.
Although the Blaine Amendments were closely associated with anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant bigotry in the 19th century, they made a handy
argument against school
vouchers in the 20th and 21st centuries.
In her The Death and Life of the Great American School System, author Diane Ravitch discusses the historical
arguments for and
against school
vouchers and school choice.