Sentences with phrase «argument at»

Analyzing legal issues, search statutes, prepare briefs, opinions, decisions, and other sources for presenting oral argument at judicial proceedings

Removing the middleman's cut is not a convincing argument at this scale.

From Townhall: Zach Graves of the R Street Institute already eviscerated this argument at some length, and some of his choicer passages deserve to be repeated here: Patent reform enjoys...

Nevertheless, identification of the person engaged in the argument (at the moment, me) adds no substance to the actual argument at hand, so what does it matter who I am?

They may be dismissed due to a good argument at a pre-trial conference that an incorrect statute was used to accuse you or that the citation is legally defective.

A new case from Florida, set for argument at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, provides a new test.

«Sillygisms» necessarily had a least four legs, thereby giving the proponent of argument at least 1 more leg to stand on when the other 3 weere knocked out from under.

If you intend to oppose the appellant's application, you may respond by serving and filing your own affidavit or argument at least one day before the chambers date.

If you intend to oppose the appellant's applications for an extension of time and for leave to appeal, you may respond by serving and filing your own affidavit or argument at least one day before the chambers date.

On 1 August 2012, Perez - Moreno intervened in an argument at work between Kulczycki, a co-worker, and an individual with whom Perez - Moreno was in a relationship.

Joshua Rogala's argument at the youth murder sentencing was successful.

I've also reread the argument you at Elsevier make for why you do not double - dip.

Lord Hope expressly lent his support to the contract argument at para 59 and Lords Rodger and Mance implicitly did so at paras 82 and 105 respectively.

Chief Justice Dickson and Justice La Forest, found that argument at odds with the need to give constitutional provisions, broad, generous and purposive interpretations (as the Court had done earlier in a number of Charter rights decisions).

Aside from some badly - needed, if incomplete, reforms having passed the House of Representatives, the question of whether or not software is patentable has been put back in front of the Supreme Court (it goes to argument at the end of March).

The wife had not raised any argument at trial that she should receive a 50 % interest in the husband's RRSP.

One theory is that greater readability merely serves as a proxy for «better» arguments — that is, arguments that rest on stronger factual and legal grounds.113 Under this theory, one party's brief is more readable than the opposing party's brief because the first party has the stronger argument at the outset.

In addition, our database includes data from every oral argument at the Illinois Supreme Court since 2008, and arguments at the California Supreme Court since May 2016, when the Court first started posting video and audio tapes of its sessions.

The argument at the Supreme Court involves only one issue that concerns us and that is should a Plaintiff's lawyer be entitled to get the 40 % fees under the offer statute, which in this case totals around $ 43,000 or the $ 93,000 that hourly would have totaled.

Read more about our work on this case, including the arguments we made at the BCSC, and our argument at the BCCA.

Our study of every oral argument at the Illinois Supreme Court from 2008 through 2016 came to the same conclusion: the larger the margin between your total questions from the Court and your opponent, the less your chance of winning.

Jay J summarised that argument at [29] as follows: «For the purposes of the discrimination claims in the Employment Tribunal and the County Court — and here the focus must be on the claims against the NMC — it was necessary for the appellant to state that she had been struck off since that would found her claim for damages and moreover the longer that she was struck off the greater would be the damages.

If they are scheduled to testify, they can watch only the closing argument at the end of the case.

Yeah, you can punt the «oh well, it's their choice» argument at me, and you'd be right.

The determination of whether a given person has met the «ordinary reasonable person» standard is often a matter that is resolved by a jury after presentation of evidence and argument at trial.

Affirmed after oral argument at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

If you had a pretty good, but still losing claim construction argument at the district court, you have an argument to the Federal Circuit that you had a reasonable believe you didn't infringe the patent because of it.

The point was first raised in argument at first instance and was not, therefore, explicitly decided by the commissioner, but Justice Rothstein was satisfied that no prejudice resulted from considering it.

The law has always had a written and an oral strand, as has the larger society, of course — how else to explain the survival of oral argument at the SCC, say, when complete reliance on written briefs and correspondence would make a great deal more sense.

That is because a narrow escape tunnel was constructed at the suggestion of Elias LJ in oral argument at the Mitchell appeal.

Taylor picks up the argument at the law firm level, argung that law firms» desire to diversify to the point where it will hire lesser qualified applicants dooms minority lawyers to failure:

That is exactly what Bob Kohn did in submitting his brief as a comic strip and makes a very convincing argument at that.

It is not unheard - of for seemingly rock - solid Crown cases to crumble in the face of vigorous cross-examination and legal argument at trial.

To be served, for example, a week before trial with six lever arch fi les with no index and no proper sequential pagination and no skeleton argument at all, is the recipe for serious injustice.

West Coast LEAF and the Community Legal Assistance Society (CLAS) were jointly granted leave to intervene in Denton v British Columbia, a case that addresses whether a claimant who was denied workers compensation benefits is barred from challenging that denial on equality grounds under the Charter because she did not raise the argument at an earlier stage of her case.

But, the BC Supreme Court dismissed her case, in part because she had not raised her Charter argument at an earlier stage of the administrative process.

However, tendering a written argument at the hearing is neither an alternative to, nor a substitute for, setting out the «Legal Basis» in a notice of application or an application response in accordance with what the Rules and the case law require.

Fortunately, Mr. Justice Savage, rejected such an argument at paragraph 39 of the judgment.

Like a well - trained judo master, you can make a big deal about these with opposing counsel as a lure for their argument at your Markman, while knowing that you'll be focusing on the terms that are your «must - wins,» as discussed above.

Cornell University law professor Michael Dorf makes a similar argument at Verdict.

Said the attorney: «I always wear that tie when I have an argument at the Court, even though it is getting a bit frayed.»

Road - mapping your argument at this level is definitely advanced oral advocacy.

BTW, GaryM, please aim your objections to the «is consistent» line of argument at Jim Cripwell too — or would that amount to some kind of social taboo amongst True Sceptics?

It's not a circular argument at all unless you're some crank who believes in electric universe theories

He sets out his argument at the start of Sec 4.2.

This is a natural cycle that will occur independently of global warming and doesn't detract from the argument at all, if you read the actual article (although the headline writer at the BBC got it all wrong)

A mainstay of the skeptics argument at various places is that the last 18 years of satellite observations are wildly less than the modelled (IPCC) scenarios.

I've made a similar argument at Climate Etc. several times, though I use 2010.33 on GISS as that is the zenith of warming.

«As to the global warming issue, the argument is so full of hype and scare tactics that I for one have decided that it is a political argument and not a scientific argument at all.

But let's take the green argument at face value.