Sentences with phrase «argument cycle with»

Do you feel stuck in the same argument cycle with your partner?

Not exact matches

With the unemployment rate down to five percent and the Fed embarked on a tightening cycle, the argument runs, indicators will start returning to earlier, higher growth trends.

Yesterday my husband and I virtually ruined our Sunday getting into an extended argument about parenting because some interactions with people at church — who happen to have a totally different personality than I do — triggered the old doubt cycle in my mind («are we really being good parents?»).

The row over the Manchester police deaths coincides with the argument over what Andrew Mitchell said or didn't say to the police officers who prevented him cycling out of the Downing Street gate, something he is normally permitted to do.

The second argument against mandatory helmet legislation relates to the view that government may see mandatory helmet legislation as «the answer» to cycling safety, with the result that other measures recommended in this Review (improved infrastructure, legislative review, education and enforcement activities) are de-emphasized or not acted upon.

He may also add his argument that he could reproduce the 11 - year solar cycle and its secular and millennial variation by superposing two harmonics with periods of 12 2/3 year and 14 year.

The basic arguments against the existence of such a relationship are that variations in climatic parameters do not always occur synchronously with the corresponding 11 - and 22 - year solar cycles: the phase shift between climatic and solar variations is inconstant and changes with time from 0 ° to 180 °.

I'd say there is a slight problem, however, with the solar cycle argument, in that the cooling of the early 90's was largely attributed to the volcanic eruption from Mt Pinatubo.

Reducing the argument to radiation as if it's «all the same energy» by stripping it of its individual properties and processes, has enabled the swapsies of properties and out of context use of laws to be made in the descriptions of energies, gases and processes, and, so ground into thinking through repetition in the education system that even the absence of the Water Cycle goes unacknowledged as you all busy yourselves arguing about the nuances of your fictional fisics with real world applied scientists who know better.

That's as far as I'm going with this, the next 1 or 2 years will be make or break for all theories — AGW, solar / ocean cycles, luke - warm, everyone, so there's no point going round and round on an argument that the actual observed climate will resolve one way or the other very soon.

This cycle is one factor in why arguments about the global nature of the Medieval Warm Period being a global event need to be looked at with some scepticism.

Generally his argument seems to be confusing multiple issues with little clarification of what he means or the specific cycles he may or may not be referring to.

The problem with that argument is that over long periods of time (like the six decades since 1950), positive and negative phases of ocean cycles tend to cancel each other out, and thus internal variability doesn't have a large influence on long - term temperatures.

But, pertaining to whatever your argument may be, what do natural cycles have to do with anthropogenic forcing and increased radiative forcing or human induced albedo changes or the like?

Further it is shown that carbon cycle modelling based on non-equilibrium models, remote from observed reality and chemical laws, made to fit non-representative data through the use of non-linear ocean evasion «buffer» correction factors constructed from a pre-conceived idea, constitute a circular argument and with no scientific validity.

The whole idea of one year funding or two year funding is ridiculous... with our amalgamation, we have a larger area to look at, if one of the arguments is to attract and retain professional staff, it's very very difficult to do that when you are tied to a one year funding cycle, sure there can be comfort letters to creditors and comments made to employees, but at the end of the day, we have a very large program to roll out with the surety of only one year funding.

Most couples tell me that they want to feel connected with their partner again; to stop the «same old arguments» from cycling over and over; to stop living like roommates; to end the painful silences; to feel heard and understood; and to feel hopeful, and happy again.»

«It's the same painful conflicts and arguments, over and over» «I don't like the way we talk to each other — it's too harsh and we get into these horrible cycles — we just drift further and further apart»» The demands of the children take over — really, there seems to be no time for the two of us» «I wish we treated each other with more respect & kindness — I sometimes feel like I just do nt matter»» We don't listen to each other — we really aren't connecting like we used to.