I don't know about you, but I'm more concerned about walking away from
an argument feeling understood than feeling like I won.
Not exact matches
She uses as bases of her
arguments the philosophies of «early Christians,» which I
feel bears no weight as they were not the prophets who
understood and wrote the holy scripture.
He also refuses to take up Hartshorne's defense of the ontological
argument (on the rather unsatisfactory ground that «when denying the ontological
argument, I always
feel like a fool») although he recognizes that it «lies at the heart» of Hartshorne's
understanding of these matters (p. 64).
You speak on what is «True Doctrine», could we also point to something such as the Consti; tution and the daily court room
arguments of lawyers and clerks who
feel that they alone know and
understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this land?
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my
argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter
argument i believe you haven't a full
understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full
understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists
feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
Hi Toivo $, Although I do
understand your
argument and your concern for the
feeling of others is admirable, I would have to counter that
argument, however, with the fact that your atheism should be just as acceptable to others with likewise respect.
I am very strong on my convictions But I always try to
understand Both sides of an
argument, not to persuade someone else's
feeling but to go deeper into mine, and question my own thought process.I did not say India was an ignorant country.
Warner at The New York Times
understands the real
argument here is about women who
feel put - upon by all the expectations associated with modern motherhood.
If you are having an
argument with your spouse and you just took acetaminophen, this research suggests you might be less
understanding of what you did to hurt your spouse's
feelings.»
I've heard all the
arguments against it and I
understand why some people
feel the way they do.
I think that I can actually
understand this
argument; however, I think most vets and other scientists
feel that it is a bad
argument for the simple reason that dogs are no longer really wild animals.
The good news is that some local and state governments have
understood these commonsense
arguments (backed by reams of studies and statistics) and have avoided passing «
feel - good» laws in favor of smart, targeted legislation that actually addresses problems and puts pet owners and animal control enforcement on the same side.
While I
understand the developers» stand for the need for always online DRM, I
feel no
argument for always online can justify having it in single player games.
Now I
understand that I'm coming dangerously close to that fine line that defends shitty controls with an «it adds to the mood»
argument, but I truly think Wander's janky movements is vital to that
feeling of desperation and helplessness against the beasts, and suddenly having a different engine for the exploration would be completely bizarre.
Every year we ask our network of some 7,000 + oil and gas professionals for their views on this contentious topic; our aim is to
understand what they believe and
feel about the issues, and what the implications for management are — it is not a survey to establish the rights and wrongs of a particular scientific
argument.
In any
argument about money you will find that you are promoting the value that is important to you, so
understanding what your partner values and respecting his / her needs around the issue allows you to move beyond just talking about money and discussing the underlying issues such as a need to
feel accepted (status), or
feel safe (security) or needing more independence (control).
Most couples tell me that they want to
feel connected with their partner again; to stop the «same old
arguments» from cycling over and over; to stop living like roommates; to end the painful silences; to
feel heard and
understood; and to
feel hopeful, and happy again.»
How do you
understand your partner's
feelings if it's the same old ping pong
argument that hurts you both and never resolves anything?
When most spouses really want is not to win an
argument, but to
feel understood.
Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, conducted experiments with 85 people in relationships and studied the couples»
arguments, as well as how happy they were in the relationship and whether they
felt their partner
understood them.
Most of them
feel that, no matter what they do, they end up engaging in the same
arguments over and over again, and each member of the partnership usually
feels like his or her needs are not
understood or met by the other.
Arguments in which both partners
feel their perspective is right, yet are divergent opinions, may benefit from a third party to listen and then give an opinion, or else guide the two to an
understanding.
Another 2010 study of 373 married couples found that, when both partners engaged positively during an
argument — meaning they discussed the topic calmly and made an effort to listen to their partner and better
understand his or her
feelings — they were far less likely to divorce than couples where there was no positive engagement or when only one partner would engage positively.
And a 2010 study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family that looked at 373 married couples found that, when both partners engaged positively during an
argument — meaning they discussed the topic calmly and made an effort to listen to their partner and better
understand his or her
feelings — they were far less likely to divorce than couples where there was no positive engagement or when only one partner would engage positively.