The idea that we've got to protect the innocent is without a doubt the most compelling
argument for violence.
Not exact matches
Seeing it again, the movie,
for all its
violence and seeming nihilism, is a sustained
argument for the personal significance of all people and the need
for personal love.
the AnViL: «as
for the strawman
argument: «But then again, what creed, code, science or faith has ever completely stopped
violence?»»
Without carpets on the floor, with screams of command from the guards regularly punctuating the atmosphere, and with small three - men cells as the locus of ongoing physical tensions and
arguments (homosexual rape is a scandalously regular form of
violence), jail offers little opportunity
for stillness and peace.
That is, if one's interlocutor is being threatened with
violence, torture, or death at the same time as he is being confronted with a polemical
argument, and if the outcome of the latter determines whether he is killed, tortured, forcibly converted, or whatever (this was, of course, the case
for many Jews in medieval Europe), then it is exceedingly doubtful that the polemic is morally proper.
Are you saying that because other authoritarian perpetuate
violence that creates an
argument for disarmament of individuals or are you merely attacking my Catholicism in an effort to discredit my
argument?
Some libertarians may find this too risky (libertarians generally favor the exclusionary rule and the fourth amendment), but this
argument puts the onus on leftists to explain their support
for a rule that contributes to gun
violence.
From what was, at times, a confused and halting justification
for this position your correspondent gleaned three interrelated strands of
argument: that the lands of Judea and Samaria are the Jewish people's «homeland;» that while the area is also claimed as a homeland by the Palestinians this merely means the territory is contested and does not detract from the Jewish claim and finally; that the Palestinians lost their right to this land by engaging in
violence in 1948 and 1967.
And I think the reporting of the
violence (while it was higher profile) is overall likely to have reduced broader sympathy and support
for the students»
argument, to the extent that it has a long - term impact.
The
argument fails immediately on this point and this is a major reason
for such an early preference
for violence.
Not sure the Falkland Islands or Tibet are the best examples
for a «no effect in practice»
argument given the
violence in both cases and all out war in the former.
People have made adaptive
arguments for human
violence, but our species has come up with mechanisms of mass
violence on a scale no other species has.
Some have criticised Schindler's List
for being a Jewish propaganda tool, but even if the graphic
violence and horrific images are as little as half true, that
argument still finds no favour with most.
Well, as my pal Abraham Riesman put it, «The movies present an all - or - nothing
argument for political
violence onto which any side can map itself.»
For example: there's a fantastic scene where an
argument between Jeff Bridges and Timothy Bottoms escalates into a fistfight — the shots start to come faster and faster, almost every new shot from a different camera angle, culminating in a shocking moment of
violence.
August 13, 2013 «Children Exposed to
Violence», by Eric Holder's Task Force, is the best
argument for SEL in every school in Massachusetts.
For example, if a policyholder's family member gets into an
argument that results in
violence, your home insurance policy will not cover any damages or a lawsuit against you resulting from that act.
So at the ending of the day I don't really believe that anyone needs to prove or give any type of evidence that games many times are not violent because I don't really believe that the
argument nearly even needs to be about the
violence and games as much as it's about that we already have a rating system
for that type of content in the first place.
The
argument for its widespread use is to reduce prison
violence.
By: Jonnette Watson Hamilton PDF Version: Landlords, Tenants, and Domestic
Violence: Landlords» Power to Terminate Residential Tenancies
for Acts of Domestic
Violence (and an
Argument for Publicly - Accessible RTDRS Reasons
for Decisions) Report Commented On: Centre
for Public Legal Education Alberta, Domestic... Continue reading →
For example, if a policyholder's family member gets into an
argument that results in
violence, your home insurance policy will not cover any damages or a lawsuit against you resulting from that act.
August 13, 2013 «Children Exposed to
Violence», by Eric Holder's Task Force, is the best
argument for SEL in every school in Massachusetts.
Fact: «The
argument for distinguishing between two qualitatively different types ofdomestic
violence — intimate terrorism and situational couple
violence — has been widely accepted by domestic
violence researchers.