This sort
of argument from authority is indeed an argument exterior to the cause but susceptible of contributing to the decision of the judge.
It's also instructive to see how the self same people who get so het up about (false claims of)
argument from authority arguing... from authority, becuase that's all this letter is.
Hmmm, a petition of scientists of questionable repute to challenge a mainstream scientific view using a
failed argument from authority — that's a new one!
Bernardo, I just think you are continuing to be silly in professing to have wisdom to impart and continuing down this path of rhetoric about a «myth» and logical fallacy
of argument from authority.
No so many major climate consensus players dodge debate, dissemble with religious appeals, censors skeptics and rely
on argument from authority.
All you've done is to make
an argument from authority.
«For the many reasons ``, being
your arguments from authority, a logically fallacious approach resulting in opinion being presented as if it were fact.
@ Falacy, I don't think he's making
an argument from authority, I think he is making an argument from SARCASM!
I refer to my earlier comment about
an argument from authority being fallacious.
you are attempting to use the logical fallacy
argument from authority.
That in itself proves nothing — using it to argue for God's existence is simply
an argument from authority, which is a well - known logical fallacy.
It seems, rather, to rely too heavily on
an argument from authority.
It is
an argument from the authority of the Bible, or at least from a certain interpretation of the Bible.
You are appealing to
the argument from authority again with talk of degrees etc Bernardo.