Sentences with phrase «argument has failed»

Such arguments have failed to convince the Community, which wants to help poverty - stricken fishermen and stop overfishing by giving fishermen other occupations.

In theory it's arguable whether putting attractive people doing suggestive dance moves on film constitutes cinema, but when you actually see it, the style, energy and sex appeal included, you'd realize any such argument would fail.

Not exact matches

Another argument is that, for all the strongly - worded new rules about resolving failing banks into bankruptcy, regulators simply won't have the guts to do so in reality.

There's still a chance to do something effective, Johnson says, but it will require a strong and independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency and the dismantling of the six American banks that have grown too big to fail — and if he isn't the first to make the argument, 13 Bankers nonetheless lends it a good deal of substance.

While this argument can take many forms, it often centers around two separate concerns: whether community institutions have the economies of scale to go toe - to - toe with the biggest banks; and whether the «too big to fail» crowd has unfair advantages that slants the playing field in their direction.

Finally, perhaps the most bothersome argument, that mandated wholesale has failed in the fixed access market in Canada.

The whole argument for the helicopter drop is that ordinary OMOs have failed.

Also, when I insult you, it's because you continue to use arguments that you have failed to justify before.

Jenkins has conspicuously failed to engage in a serious way the arguments of his own critics.

He is, according to National Journal, «perhaps the most extreme» of a network of U.S. evangelicals who, having failed in their crusade against all things gay at home, travel abroad to connect with anti-gay activists and arm them with arguments that, for example, homosexuals will seduce their children, corrupt all of society, and eventually take over the country.

Obviously, so the argument goes, if we want to cut teenage pregnancies and abortions we must have access to sexual health services — in other words, teenagers are less likely to get pregnant if they are using contraception; failing contraception, then we should give them access to the morning - after pill, which may be seen as preferable to a twelve - year - old getting pregnant.

In short, mainline liberals have failed so far to make a persuasive biblical argument to prompt us to change our minds and those of Christians worldwide.

They have shown unthinkable negligence in failing to weigh up objectively arguments that might challenge the new orthodoxy — one which, seemingly overnight, has been imposed on our society.

You tried to claim otherwise the other day, but you never actually had any argument, every point you tried to make was shot down because there was no logic or reason behind it, so you failed.

Homebrew laws have failed to materialize for the past five years, with religion and morality arguments narrowly beating out the estimated 5,000 underground homebrewers in the state who say their civil liberties are on the line.

If we examine Marx's critique carefully, we will recognize that its most important argument is the fact that Christianity during its almost two thousand years of existence, has failed to do away with poverty, servitude, wars and social disorder.

Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect «unborn persons,» and Catholic Health's lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments.

If it fails to satisfy that requisite, if it has to make up for its weakness in argument by handling the sword, it needs no other argument for its falsification.

To the extent that Trump is getting traction with his foreign policy views, it is because America's responsible politicians have failed to reach the public with comprehensible arguments.

Person and self are the words that carry our present - day moral universe, and it is sad to note that the more traditional arguments about sexual relations have failed to take their meaning and power into account.

If more States had adopted the ACA and set up their own sites the Federal site would not have been overloaded which is what Fox and the conservatives are all upset about now since their ideology argument failed so badly, now all they have is «The Websites Broken!

Ken Ham challenged Bill Nye to a debate, even while Ken Ham continues to run from me and my proposal that he «come out» and «come clean» regarding his positions relating to my argument that so many of his followers rail against but which quite properly is able to demonstrate why it is, in part, that young - earth creation - science promoters have failed in their scientific pretensions and legal challenges.

Third, in his argument that computation can not produce intelligent agency, Mr. Dembski fails to note that we have only begun to explore analog computation, which mimics the way simple neural systems process information, and quantum computation, whose method of solving problems mimics a «leap of intuition.»

Aside from the questionableness of this culturally based argument that two people must have a leader, Hunt fails to be convincing because she forsakes her quite adequate method of interpretation for a «literalistic» misunderstanding of the Scriptural text.

Did this guy just come to a point where, like I have said, when your argument fails to convert, or diminish... what is going to be the next logical step in some extremist mind?

I fail to see how that would be a bad argument.

thefinisher1 If babies are born atheist, and would remain atheist until they are taught to believe in a god who introduces various reasons to hate others, then your argument fails.

It has often been asked how it could be that two men of Luther's and Cajetan's intelligence could meet and fail to isolate at least that partial theological agreement which did in fact lie beneath their arguments and positions.

U.S. embassies in both old and new Europe have, with rare exceptions, failed to carry the crucial moral and political arguments in Europe's centers of public opinion.

The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian values argument, as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.

Scott's argument is essentially that art — which tries to explore the problems of existence — is failing us today, when our challenges are just as big as they ever have been.

By failing to realize the difference between «equivalent» and «identical» in Whitehead's argument, by failing to see that Whitehead has already established the fact that the regions contained in other regions are not always topologically equivalent regions, he summarily lumps all abstractive sets into one set.

One could argue that these injuries are influenced by the pies / medical team as one of the strong arguments around failed title challenges since 2006 have been down to a significant amount of injuries.

When adversaries stick it to you from outside the club, always trying to cause a stir within and among us and we have so called fans agreeing with these failed pundits who prolly do nt even have a voice in their own households, we like illegitimate children back up their unsincere arguments, hell Piers Morgan does it from a place of genuine concern, the AKBs and AOBs too, Fatboy gooner and NY gunner on here even and we are happy to have them but when we thoughtlessly indulge and endorse those who would rather see us fail by always coming up with.unsolicited advise especially without any reasonable bases, we are as much enemies of the club we claim to love, cutting of our nose to spite our face... shame again.

they would be the one team that you could make an argument for being able to spot talent in the draft and they still fail repeatedly.

According to Metro the two Arsenal forwards had a running argument during the Carabao Cup win over Doncaster, with the Chilean apparently growing ever more frustrated with his French team mate for some failed flicks and tracks and a general inability for them to get anything going.

the reason you don't get the goalkeeper argument is because fans in general don't know how to assess keepers we think if he makes a few saves he great, but thats not how it works, its a specialist position, where the lay man fan can't really see the defeciecies, the fact that Bob Wilson Wengers ass wiper himself cast doubts speaks volumes.i don't think Wenger will do whats required for us to push on hes not capable of it, not ruthless enough.We all know Arteta, Flamini an Diaby should be gone, but will they be gone thats the question.If they are still in our squad next season then Wenger has failed us again like the last 10 years

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

Ahh so we should keep wenger because of our history, good argument All cluba move on and managers are paid huge sum for success if this is a buisness which you've said before, then we are failing, so want us to continue

He ignored my tuition and failed to see the non-sequitor of his argument; he stated that the object of playing football was to win games and that if a team won more games than any others, like Chelsea had, then clearly they were playing «gooder» football than anyone else!

The argument from the WOB is that Wenger is not getting any younger, has failed to sustain a title challenge or compete for the biggest honours whilst, at the same time Tottenham are getting stronger.

The results seem to substantiate the arguments of those who said Ed Miliband's decision to back government cuts would alienate his own support while failing to win the backing of Tory - leaning voters.

It has failed to make the argument that what is good for business leaders is not necessarily good for their workers.

At the most fundamental level, Butt's argument from responsibility implies that every day, irrespective of whether a victim asks, when we fail to fulfill rectificatory duties to a victim of colonization or their offspring, this injustice implicates society anew, thereby «covering», implicating, or including the new members of that society who have failed to rectify for the past injustice.

Labour's argument was rejected - or failed to get across (partly because it all seemed about # 6 billion this year)- but against opponents who said cutting waste was important, but in David Cameron's case that he would reject any ministerial plan to cut public services.

BTW - The left now has no argument at all its polices have clearly failed the Nation.

Indeed much energy has been invested into explaining why the apparent numerical majority of the poor has failed to produce socialist outcomes through the ballot (this is Przeworski's and Sprague's famous «paper stones» argument).

«The reports provide a much greater insight than any information already available about the UCP [Universal Credit programme], there are strong arguments for transparency and accountability for a programme which may affect 11 million UK citizens and process billions of pounds, which has had numerous reported failings in its governance.»

«The government has failed miserably in trying to make a false statements case,» Linda Mangano's attorney, John Carman, told jurors before ending his closing argument.»

The whole campaign theme is constructed around an economic argument that since the crash the Conservatives have failed to reform the economy so that it tackles inequality and delivers for working people.