The only
argument presented for that conclusion is that the publicity resulted in some irrational (bad science) comments from climate change «deniers».
The evidentiary material and
argument presented for the purposes of the review will have to be presented again by the claimant at trial.
Not exact matches
Writers and commentators
present entirely logical
arguments for why a tax or a regulation aimed at levelling the playing field between regular homebuyers and the world's ultra-rich would be an entirely reasonable response to what clearly is an unusual situation.
As it turned out, they needed us to reframe the
argument for conserving wetlands and
present a business perspective.
«Any
argument they make
for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges
presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»
CATA found support
for its views in the
arguments presented in the Mowat Centre study and C.D. Howe commentary about the importance of rebalancing the indirect tax based mechanism to better achieve successful commercialization in Canada.
«The company has yet to
present a convincing
argument on what synergies can come from the merger», a lawyer
for Elliott argued.
Unless the
argument is that interest rates and inflation are likely to remain low
for the indefinite future, it's absurd to argue that
present levels of inflation and interest rates are relevant to setting the valuations of stocks.
These results
present a challenge to
arguments for greater shareholder oversight of corporate political activities.
I think mutual funds with load are in its way to extinction, but there are many of them still out there and there are many astute commission - based advisors who will
present persuasive
arguments for you to buy them.
Taken together, we believe these factors
present a compelling
argument why investors should exit all of the electronic gold products specified at the beginning of this article, and convert the proceeds into physical gold and / or non-Deep State - controlled equities of companies in which they have full confidence that managements are working
for them, not the bullion banks.
As one private equity investor points out, protecting under - performing sectors might have been wise in deflationary times (to keep unemployment from ballooning) though as reflation returns the need
for productivity to restrain costs could
present an
argument for reform in the worst - performing sectors.
«Leading academics, the former Children's Commisioner
for Wales, the
present Children's Commissioner
for Wales, and psychiatrists are all saying that it's totally unacceptable
for us to have the
argument that it's reasonable to hit a child.
The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same
arguments and ideas
presented as an explanation
for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation
for a different text.
In other words, Griffin's
argument is that process theology
presents a much more plausible explanation
for natural evil than can classical theism.
When this is done, no
argument is needed against the real presence of a past figure,
for a past figure by definition is not the
present subjectivity, is not contemporary, and is precisely one no longer subject to being
presented through the senses.7 The presence of a past figure can be made intelligible and justified only by a quite different notion of presence specifically appropriate to the relation of the past to the
present.
I have tried to
present the
arguments for the
present system fairly and then my
arguments against it.
This forms the basis
for the
argument for the soul, which was well
presented by Kevin Douglas in the January issue of this magazine.
Greeley dedicates the
present book to Tracy, offering it as sociological support
for Tracy's
argument.
The evidence
for it is less clearly found in Process and Reality than in Religion in the Making, yet it seems to be
present in the philosophy of Whitehead in such a way that this third
argument is really more fundamental than the two just summarized.
The rational
arguments for theism were never stronger than they are today and never better
presented.
However, the Roman Catholic module exam questions almost invariably allow the Catholic view to be stated; therefore it is important to teach a robust apologetic
for the Catholic world view, while also critically
presenting the opposing
arguments of contemporary society and liberal Christianity.
Though this schema remains, in much reduced form, in the
present volume, Hopewell found the central image, the body, unsatisfactory as a conveyance
for his essentially structuralist
arguments about congregational narrative.
The singular and plural openings to the creed have both been used throughout the history of Christian worship, and
arguments can be
presented for both.
Having once been an agnostic, I know most of the
arguments unbelievers use, I use most of them myself... I also know
for a fact that you can not argue someone into a belief in God, they have to get their on their own, with the evidence
presented for Him...
An honest apologetic that
presents rational
arguments for a particular religious world view is less likely to indoctrinate then a superficially neutral presentation that contains hidden assumptions and bias.
Space doesn't allow
for the multiplicity of
arguments that could be
presented for belief in God, but if a sceptic were to ask me to sum up a few, I would offer the following three reasons.
your role now as atheist, is to be the opposing argumenter
for the modern day change process or evolution of the
present religion from monotheism which you have shown in your
arguments to be flawed so that the future faithfuls will shift to the ultra modern faith called PANTHROTHEISM - the synthesis of theistic monotheism vs.humanistic atheism.I suggest to you to be more aggressive and conscise in your
arguments, God needs you
These are sayings
for the authenticity of which it is possible to offer strong
arguments, and they
present the fundamental emphases of the teaching of Jesus concerning the Kingdom.
No
argument could possibly prove that this gap exists because all such demonstrations are only helps
for man to come to reflective consciousness of what is intuitively
present within man's consciousness.
And a convincing
argument can be made that,
for serious Christians and Jews, a truly adequate education is education in the fullness of truth
presented as the truth.
I just signed up
for an account so I could say that this piece
presented prehaps the worst
argument I've ever read, and that's saying a lot.
But this is not the place to
present arguments for pan-experientialism (Griffin).
Later on in the book, he discusses these groups at some length, but without seeing how these millions of fervent believers in our
present undermine his central
argument for declension.
There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this
present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing
arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare
for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern
for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.
Powers doesn't make a case
for either side of this
argument; he merely
presents the situation as an example of the compromise the church may have to make.
The
argument of this paper was
presented at the meeting of the Society
for the Study of Process Philosophy on March 18.
Berger is a skilled theorist who knows how to
present a compelling example but also how to provide the necessary caveats and qualifications
for his
arguments.
Although I shall not spell out the
argument here, I think that there is an implicit contradiction in holding that we depend on God, who timelessly knows all our acts, past or future as they may be
for us now, and yet our
present reality does not necessitate our future acts.
My kids chose atheism over religion when
presented with
arguments for both.
Still, the
arguments presented in the book (or anyplace else
for that matter) stand on their own merit.
In it I want to do three things: firstly, to overview Roman Catholic positions on the spiritual soul, secondly to mention some of the reasons
for the
present virtual silence about the soul and, thirdly, to provide the beginning of a positive
argument for the human soul.
My second
argument is that even if by some measures vast growth does reduce the percentage of the world's population that is desperately poor,
present policies will destroy the natural basis
for our life together long before they resolve the problem of poverty.
derp, I'm wondering if you have read the book by Dr. Stephen Myers called «Signature in the Cell» which argues that specifically encoded DNA strands store information in a precise and logical manner which provides some evidence that an
argument for intelligent design is
present?
Once again, people believe what they believe, and if somebody can
present a reasonable
argument for his / her stance to somebody who's willing to listen, that's great.
The point of our
argument is that neither the settled past nor the relatively indeterminate
present can explain the possibility of a new occasion,
for the determinate can no more decide or act than can the determinable.
The
arguments against evolution have been so explicitly and thoroughly expounded in the Catholic theology of the last eighty years, that it is not to be expected that later on they will become even more evident, in relation to the Church's awareness of what she believes, than they are now, and so become capable of providing new and certain grounds
for rejecting the theory of evolution of a kind that have been declared to be not yet at
present available.
For the present, my argument is simply that the talk about «immortality of the soul» has served to provide for a great many Christian people what they wrongly took to be the right and proper Christian way of escaping the stark reality of total dea
For the
present, my
argument is simply that the talk about «immortality of the soul» has served to provide
for a great many Christian people what they wrongly took to be the right and proper Christian way of escaping the stark reality of total dea
for a great many Christian people what they wrongly took to be the right and proper Christian way of escaping the stark reality of total death.
Even if, however, all the contextual and exegetical material
presented above is wrong, and this verse does in fact teach that God ordained these particular Gentiles to receive eternal life (which the
arguments above show He did not), this verse is still not a good proof - text
for the Calvinistic doctrine of Unconditional Election.
While Matthew is essentially just
presenting the same
arguments various biblical scholars have been making
for decades, he summarized the position so well, it's worth sharing
for discussion.