«To place defendants»
argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»
Reducing the
argument to radiation as if it's «all the same energy» by stripping it of its individual properties and processes, has enabled the swapsies of properties and out of
context use of laws to be made
in the descriptions of energies, gases and processes, and, so ground into thinking through repetition
in the education system that even the absence of the Water Cycle goes unacknowledged as you all busy yourselves arguing about the nuances of your fictional fisics with
real world applied scientists who know better.