Sentences with phrase «argument in the case for»

One of the key arguments in the case for fracking rests on an appeal to common sense.

Being rich is obviously a must, being famous helps, but being a loyal, longtime collector is the strongest argument in the case for delivery.

Not exact matches

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, both conservatives, hinted during an hour - long argument in the case at support for the Justice Department's stance that because Microsoft is based in the United States it was obligated to turn over data sought by prosecutors in a U.S. warrant.

This is the strongest material case in the «you get what you pay for» argument, so it shouldn't be overlooked.

Though in this case, Pressman said he did not believe the national security argument for the order was clear, opening the door to further questioning.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a case that could have serious implications for lawsuits involving businesses overseas.

Oral arguments in that case are scheduled for Dec. 17.

Much of the technical evidence in the case has been filed under seal, making it impossible for outside observers to independently assess the strength of each side's arguments.

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments Wednesday in a case that could derail the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly referred to as Obamacare, and potentially increase the cost of insurance for millions across the U.S.. It's a big deal, and it has insurance companies, medical providers and everyday workers holding their breath.

In the 1800s, in Europe, the argument for the liberalization of bankruptcy law, and the introduction of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a great succesIn the 1800s, in Europe, the argument for the liberalization of bankruptcy law, and the introduction of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a great succesin Europe, the argument for the liberalization of bankruptcy law, and the introduction of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a great success.

The plaintiffs emphasized in their Monday brief «the importance that the cases move expeditiously to resolution,» adding that the parties will soon submit a «joint proposed schedule for prompt summary - judgment briefing and oral argument following consolidation.»

The plaintiffs» motion states that in June 14 and 15 conference calls, counsel for the three sets of plaintiffs stated that they supported coordination or consolidation, «subject to the parties» agreement that these three cases will retain their separate identities, allowing each set of plaintiffs to file separate briefs, make separate oral arguments, and independently make other litigation decisions.»

Instead, it addressed the questions it proposed to the parties in June when it set down the case for an unusual second argument in September, those of whether Austin and McConnell should be overruled.

Using Pakistan as a case study, this article analyzes the ongoing debate and concludes that while there is merit to arguments on both sides, prudent policy recommendations for the governance of the United States» covert drone program fall somewhere in between.

The first oral arguments in the string of lawsuits filed against DOL's fiduciary rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

In place of misplaced animus and misleading arguments, he offers a strong case for dramatically expanding America's most successful domestic program in an age of rising inequality and widespread financial insecurity.&raquIn place of misplaced animus and misleading arguments, he offers a strong case for dramatically expanding America's most successful domestic program in an age of rising inequality and widespread financial insecurity.&raquin an age of rising inequality and widespread financial insecurity.»

In what is likely to be a heated argument over the legacy of Uber's lightning rod of a founder and former CEO, attorneys for both Travis Kalanick and one of the car - hailing company's largest investors, Benchmark Capital, will square off in the first oral argument in the month - old casIn what is likely to be a heated argument over the legacy of Uber's lightning rod of a founder and former CEO, attorneys for both Travis Kalanick and one of the car - hailing company's largest investors, Benchmark Capital, will square off in the first oral argument in the month - old casin the first oral argument in the month - old casin the month - old case.

In arguments before U.S. District Judge William Alsup, attorneys for both parties laid out their case related to Waymo's request for a temporary injunction against Uber that would force the ride - hailing company to stop testing its autonomous cars.

We believe equities outside the United States look exceedingly attractive in the current environment relative to US stocks.2 The argument for non-US stocks today in many ways resembles the case for value stocks that we've been making over the past 18 months.

Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments on Aug. 25 in the first hearing in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

Indeed, in oral arguments on Sept. 23 in the second case before Judge Daniel Crabtree in the District of Kansas, attorneys for insurer Market Synergy argued Labor failed to prove the current state - based regulation of fixed - indexed annuities is broken, and that the judge should «hit the pause» button on including them in the rule.

Some, like Yoram Hazony in his» Biblical Case for Limited Government,» have even offered sophisticated (if in the end limited) arguments for why a restricted role for government is itself a Judeo - Christian value.

A similar treasure lies in store for those more interested in judicial cases or published arguments than in personal correspondence.

In any case, it constitutes a further argument for the necessity of God's existence.

«Lewis wrote in a time when, among the educated British public if not among their professional philosophers, there was considerably more agreement than there is now about what constitutes a valid and rational argument for a given case.»

While Faith continues primarily to reason for the existence of God through science, the book's salutary contribution to this reviewer's thought is the case that the moral argument is the most effective in reasoning for God's existence on university campuses.

The benefit of this arrangement is particularly evident in the Lochner exchange: Arkes brilliantly defends this misunderstood case, but for all the skill of his revisionist argument, he is, as Donald Drakeman convincingly contends, unable to distinguish the interpretive approach of Lochner» using the due process clause to invalidate a statute because of disagreement with its substance» from Roe, which Arkes has rejected elsewhere.

Hamlyn notes that «epogoge is involved in the application of general principles to cases, not just in the argument for the general principles themselves» (170).

Thinking abilities disabled... check Lobotomy performed, just in case any reasoning faculties are still active... check «GOD H8S F.AGS» T - shirt... check Armed with 2000 year old arguments for invisible old men in the sky that have been refuted on countless occasions... check

Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect «unborn persons,» and Catholic Health's lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments.

Instead, I will assume that the case for neoclassical metaphysics can otherwise be made and attempt programmatically to show that the comprehensive purpose it formulates grounds justice as compound, grounds a substantive principle of justice that consistently implies the formative human rights of communicative respect.7 Toward the conclusion of this argument, I will also seek to identify an inclusive human right that is substantive in character.

For information regarding some of the legal battles and arguments, see «Case Studies,» in The Ethics of Reproductive Technology.

At the Center for Law and Religion Forum, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a podcast on last week's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the Contraception Mandate case.

But I think it worthwhile to insist that Sherburne's basic argument thus far does not express them; otherwise, the reader might suppose Sherburne had displayed a very basic weakness in Whitehead's case for theism that does not in fact exist.

In any case, this is only one argument for God's existence among many that Hartshorne offers, and the rest of them consist of showing that belief in God is implicit in our experience, meaning that it is «required for the interpretation of some fundamental aspect of life or experience» (CSPM 280In any case, this is only one argument for God's existence among many that Hartshorne offers, and the rest of them consist of showing that belief in God is implicit in our experience, meaning that it is «required for the interpretation of some fundamental aspect of life or experience» (CSPM 280in God is implicit in our experience, meaning that it is «required for the interpretation of some fundamental aspect of life or experience» (CSPM 280in our experience, meaning that it is «required for the interpretation of some fundamental aspect of life or experience» (CSPM 280).

There were a few voices in the late sixties and early seventies who spoke of the importance of this cardinal principle (Faith Magazine, for example) and the consequences of overturning it but for very many laity and clergy it was the «hard case» argument that won.

(CNN)- Opening arguments are scheduled for Monday in Philadelphia in the first case in which an official of a Roman Catholic archdiocese has been accused of protecting abusive priests by moving them from parish to parish.

That is, if one's interlocutor is being threatened with violence, torture, or death at the same time as he is being confronted with a polemical argument, and if the outcome of the latter determines whether he is killed, tortured, forcibly converted, or whatever (this was, of course, the case for many Jews in medieval Europe), then it is exceedingly doubtful that the polemic is morally proper.

I also thank Kristen Robinson Doe for citing particular cases of great relevance to my argument — although it should also be mentioned that political philosophy is one surviving sub-discipline (my own, it turns out) in which the big questions can still be explored.

The argument is particularly devastating today, for it is addressed precisely to the deprived, to workers, to those who live in underdeveloped countries (who are in even worse case than the besieged in Jerusalem), and it is true enough on its negative side.

John, I think the best argument against Pascal's wager is the fact that he underestimates (in the passage I quoted, actually) the cost of wagering for God if it is the case that God doesn't exist.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

In any case, the argument against Christian majoritarianism influencing public policy rests more on respect for minority feelings than on the alleged disintegration of the majority.

I'm probably beating a dead horse on this one... You're correct in that it doesn't imply the non-existece of god, but if that's the only argument / evidence for god, then your case isn't very strong.

In any case, when an atheist blames god for all the horrible things in the world, it's to bolster an argument that the christian god (or any other man made god for that matter) does not exist or else he wouldn't have allowed these things to happeIn any case, when an atheist blames god for all the horrible things in the world, it's to bolster an argument that the christian god (or any other man made god for that matter) does not exist or else he wouldn't have allowed these things to happein the world, it's to bolster an argument that the christian god (or any other man made god for that matter) does not exist or else he wouldn't have allowed these things to happen.

One of the strongest arguments in recent years for abolishing the death penalty has arisen, not from the moral prohibition against the taking of life, but from the fact that with rare exceptions those who are executed are people who lack the means to secure good legal assistance, or lack the educational background to make full use of such assistance, or lack the social status which brings the case to public attention.11

I mean you can make an argument, as of course, [was done in] The Case for Faith... that there is a logical argument for the truth of Christianity.

In any case, in whatever terms the argument is cast» that the trouble is the kids need some order and discipline, or need to raise their sights, or need to do something that matters, or are soft and spoiled» the notion of service is at bottom not something to be demanded from them but something to be done for theIn any case, in whatever terms the argument is cast» that the trouble is the kids need some order and discipline, or need to raise their sights, or need to do something that matters, or are soft and spoiled» the notion of service is at bottom not something to be demanded from them but something to be done for thein whatever terms the argument is cast» that the trouble is the kids need some order and discipline, or need to raise their sights, or need to do something that matters, or are soft and spoiled» the notion of service is at bottom not something to be demanded from them but something to be done for them.

Nope, in case you're still having trouble, its basically a video about the timeline of Jesus» supposed life, however the important part of this particular one in the series is that it contains a Monty Python sketch that makes fun of you, or rather, religious people's habit of continually mutating their argument for any absurd possibility.

This is not an argument from design (in that case, it is not possible to find more than that what is given in nature itself); it is a true transcendental argument, looking for the conditions of possibility of those features that are truly exhibited by the world in which we live, and without which that world would not be conceivable.