Sentences with phrase «argument is wrong on»

Your argument is wrong on multiple levels.

Not exact matches

I could be wrong — and all five of the Republican candidates for President still standing would tell me I am — but Apple's take on CALEA strikes me as a compelling argument.

Regardless of the defensibility of the Post «s argument about whether Snowden deserves to be prosecuted, which even the editorial board seems to be waffling on, there are two fundamental things wrong with this editorial approach.

«Horizon Zero Dawn» on PS4 and «PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds» on Xbox One stick out as strong arguments for each, and that's not wrong.

«We were right on the factual arguments and yet so wrong in the arguing.

It might be possible to make a reasonable argument that Mr. Trudeau has done nothing wrong — the same ethics commissioner to whom the Harper government deferred on the matter of Nigel Wright's cheque seems to have cleared Mr. Trudeau to make the speeches he made between 2008 and 2012.

But if Peter's argument is that it hasn't worked because it is the wrong strategy then he is simply wrong on the facts.

and youre using what you know of for THIS life here on earth... your arguments don't work... they are wrong arguments..

... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.

The argument never touches on any objection to IVF per se ¯ how the creation of new human beings in this way is itself wrong.

If you have even that very basic simple fact wrong, it indicates you are basing a portion of your argument on false information.

(CNN)- A Catholic hospital in hot water for claiming in a Colorado court that a fetus is not a person backtracked on Monday, saying it was «morally wrong» to make the argument while defending itself in a wrongful death lawsuit.

Having being on the receiving end of the «man - hater» comment more times than I can count, seeing it listed as number one — in the form of «I like white males so much I married one» — rubbed me the wrong way.Being called a man - hater is often unfairly used as a way to silence women and dismiss their arguments outright, which is troubling, especially when it happens in the midst of a theological discussion.

For example, if you challenge a particular Reformed understanding of a biblical text based on exegetical arguments, the response you will likely get is, «Well, that is wrong because Augustine and Calvin said this...»

Brown's conclusion is based on this premise and it is here that Brown has gone wrong in his argument.

On the other hand, I find I can not make any argument that research on stem cells garnered from spontaneously aborted fetuses is intrinsically wronOn the other hand, I find I can not make any argument that research on stem cells garnered from spontaneously aborted fetuses is intrinsically wronon stem cells garnered from spontaneously aborted fetuses is intrinsically wrong.

We would expect an argument that informs his readers just exactly why his «progressive» friends are so wrong on this issue and the right wing «pro-life extremists» are right.

Personally, for instance, I would contend that deliberately induced abortion is wrong and that that conclusion can be reached on the basis of «utilitarian» (i.e., natural law) analysis; my arguments, however, would not be so clear that no sincere person could reject them without being suspected of perversity.

One hates to make old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?

Too often, Christian commentaries on Vashti digress into silly arguments about whether Vashti was right or wrong to defy her husband.

this is an old argument which delusional theists have lost already, so i don't intend to expound on it further other than to point out once more — you're wrong.

Those beleaguered moderates are beleaguered because their argument on the matter is reduced to politics; and a purely political matter is, de facto, not a matter of right and wrong, but of differing opinion.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

Instead we are taken on a gentle tour of three arguments put forward for atheism:» [T] hat conflicts fought in the name of religion are always about religion; that it is ultimately possible to know with confidence what is right and what is wrong without acknowledging the existence of God; and that atheist states are not actually atheist.»

I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of that argument.

This is the wrong topic on which to base that argument.

You have it all wrong, let's start with this but there are much more arguments that will enlighten you on the subject matter.

The weirdest part is that he doesn't just plow on but actually has said repeatedly how much sounder his arguments are and demonstrates over and over that he really can't see all the times he's shown to be wrong.

We left a family function, she and her sister had gotten into an argument... On the drive home, she went on a tirade and asked my opinion — I told her that her sister was right, and she was wrong.On the drive home, she went on a tirade and asked my opinion — I told her that her sister was right, and she was wrong.on a tirade and asked my opinion — I told her that her sister was right, and she was wrong...

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

To be honest Fred I'm P off with this site im100 % sure Spurs fans are on here or why would someone want a left back at CB, either Spurs fans or the usual Tv arsenal fans, they can't even put a decent argument, so it's easy to thumb down, there's only a few on here who I do Ramadan their posts, Caraig, Phillnosethompson, arseovertit, twig, yourself, robinvanpayslip, and a few others who make decent arguments either way, and others are just to brainwashed to see what's wrong,

You'll probably get a long, well - supported argument about «exactly what is wrong with Raw,» and detailed thoughts on how the WWE has mismanaged their biggest prospects, but it all centers around how spectacle — the thing the WWE in particular depends so much on — needs to be managed very, very carefully.

I think it's pretty telling that one of the «pro» pink slime blog posts that I found on twitter has ranchers and farmers that are telling the author that she is on the wrong side of the argument.

Would it really bring greater satisfaction if absolute certainty could be introduced or would it actually take away the great enjoyment that football fans obviously get from the argument and the discussion about the rights and wrongs of decisions on which individual games, cups and championships turn?

If they hear the evidence on some debated question and decide the right answer is X, then no one is allowed to offer any evidence or any argument that in fact X is wrong, under threat of fines and imprisonment.

(Douglad Carswell will, I am sure, believe it shows he is winning the argument): Hence «Pointing out the scale of climate scepticism among the online opinion formers on the right does not, of course, prove that they are wrong, or right.

This speech to the Fabian Society disproves Lammy's loyalist credentials unless he is making an inadvertent miscalulation in attacking Labour's record on social mobility — surely he must be in the wrong party to be deliberately exposing the divide between their aspiration and achievement from a position of government, and it beggars belief that a serious politician would undermine their own argument in this way after suggested he himself has been a beneficiary of the process.

He added: «While we've been working to get Britain back on track, Labour are on the wrong side of every argument.

He is of course right to suggest that their position puts then firmly on the wrong side of the argument and interestingly suggests that on this particular matter, and welfare reform in general the public are ahead of the politicians.

There is nothing wrong with Davis» argument on its own terms, but it is very contentious.

«The only people on the wrong side of the argument are him and his chancellor who are trying to divide the country,» Miliband replies.

If she had gone on that trail, all you could be doing is to challenge her on the basis of legal and judicial arguments and not the ethnocentric... it is because she threw the thing in that realm that is why she got it wrong,» charged Mr. Baako stated.

Mr Osborne is a master at putting his political opponents on the wrong side of an argument that he has framed himself.

Attitudes amongst the public on welfare have been hardening putting Labour on the wrong side of the argument.

«The argument that gay and bisexual men are a trivial sideshow in the global fight against AIDS is wrong,» he told the Global Forum on MSM and HIV, an advocacy network that met this summer prior to the International AIDS Conference in Vienna, Austria.

The arguments put forth on both sides of this issue rest on such a level of compounding assumptions that only one thing can be certain: that both of them are completely wrong.

But perhaps the main argument, the participants agreed, was that 0.005 is just as arbitrary as 0.05, and that the threshold depends on what is already known about a topic and the risks associated with getting a wrong answer.

s entire argument based on local conditions in Greenland and Antarctica undermining past temperature assessments using dO18 is wrong.

Your arguments become focused entirely on the kids — either your husband isn't doing enough in caring for them or what he tries is always wrong.

Whether it's an argument with a loved one, a project at work gone horribly wrong, or something far worse, we've all had those times when our minds just won't let us move on.