But
this argument misses the point.
Andrea Vecchio, a founder of East Islip TaxPac, said that
argument misses the point.
[Response:
Your argument misses the point in three different and important ways, not even considering whether or not the Black Hills data have any general applicability elsewhere, which they may or may not: (1) It ignores the point made in the post about the potential effect of previous, seasonal warming on the magnitude of an extreme event in mid summer to early fall, due to things like (especially) a depletion in soil moisture and consequent accumulation of degree days, (2) it ignores that biological sensitivity is far FAR greater during the warm season than the cold season for a whole number of crucial variables ranging from respiration and photosynthesis to transpiration rates, and (3) it ignores the potential for derivative effects, particularly fire and smoke, in radically increasing the local temperature effects of the heat wave.
In my opinion,
this argument misses the point and is not the right place to start.
[51] It seems to me that
this argument misses the point: as unusual as it may seem to many, before the accident Ms. Savoie was someone who could properly be described as «house - proud», in the sense that term was employed in Prednichuk v. Spencer, 2009 BCSC 1396 at para. 113 (perhaps without the elements of construction encompassed in that case).
Not exact matches
The twins»
argument is that people are
missing the
point when they try to think of cryptocurrencies in terms of person - to - person transactions.
The
argument, he says,
misses the
point.
Khan's
arguments make the
point that the public interest is
missing from traditional consideration of antitrust.
The
argument about the relevance of the tithe to the modern Christ - followers really
misses the
point, though.
Leaving aside lame
arguments as to whether it provides some type of support for the Abrahamic religions, the author seems to have
missed the entire
point of the new discovery.
Besides, you
missed the whole
point of the
argument; if any of these variables were different, the universe would not exist.
But of course, this
argument misses the entire
point of your disagreement with me about what happens to unfruitful branches.
I have always felt that dispensationalism and covenant theology (as well as many other
arguments)
miss the whole
point of the Gospel.
IM referring to GENETICS.or the supposed thoughts that genetics played a role... YOU are basing yous on CHOICES... youre
missing out entirely on the
point and line of
argument... I NEVER denied that what you said..
there are some
arguments not worth having, because both sides
miss the
point and
point of view means nothing then.
Can I just
point out that if Giroud had
missed so many brilliant chances he would have been slaughtered on here (no
argument that Aguero is amazing though).
These
arguments don't quite hold up, and so we
miss a serious
point.
So in conclusion, the real
arguments against paleo are catching straws and
missing the main
point of the paleo.
while your
arguments are well worth the read, you completely
miss the
point by failing to acknowledge that the article talks about a scientific recommendation partially inspired by historical facts and sustainable agriculture together with modern knowledge about what comprises a healthy diet.
Our online experts never
miss the
point and always include only proved and relevant
arguments in coursework that helps them to avoid any kind of irrelevancy in coursework.
Firstly his premise is mistaken, ebooks are not the disruption, merely the manifestation of the disruption (of which more below) and secondly even if we are to accept his categorization of ebooks as the disruption / sustaining innovation, he
misses a key
point about the nature of the trade publishing industry that undermines his
argument.
Sure, one could make the
argument that the game is as wide as the ocean but as shallow as a puddle since individually all the mechanics are simple, basic affairs, and yet that would be
missing the
point; if they were deeper then I don't think the game would be as relaxing and peaceful as it is.
That seemed to be a voice, or narrative, that was only half - followed through — like an
argument with a couple of key
points missing.
This
argument about whether there is one or more null hypotheses seems to me to
miss the
point — there are as many nulls as there are alternatives, and the alternative inescapably frames its null.
What I
point out each and every time, is that they all seem to
miss the Climate Scientists
argument: since we can't show it happening (in our models) it must not be natural (because we know we have included every natural possibility!)
So, the
argument that removal of the sun and observing a down temperature trend somehow makes the current statistical research approaches a worthy goal is to completely
miss the
point of chaotic systems.
These
arguments miss the whole
point between measuring real temps or a anomaly.
After taking a week to thoroughly examine every
point made on this blog (I know I probably
missed a few) and every
argument / counter-
argument, I have actually found that most of the graphs and sites
pointing out «substantial evidence» have been completely utterly inconclusive, and have left me more skeptical than I was before.
You seem to have
missed the
point of that
argument.
Mistakes can be made and should be allowed to be corrected in a timely manner once
pointed out, yet I see no evidence of that in this case — please
point out the corrective NSF press release and media conference if I have
missed it, and I will be happy to drop this line of
argument.
But that
argument completely
misses the
point.
[You
miss the
point — I don't mind word play, I just dislike it when it is effectively an attack on the person who's
argument you are disagreeing with (in this case Dave, hence the Bowman «wordplay»), rather than a critique of their
argument's logic]
You have a truly remarkable gift for completely
missing the
point, or did you not even read the rebuttal to this
argument?
But approaching the question of discernable temperature anomalies and trends and correlations with human behaviour with curve fitting... and then to bog down in
arguments about whether it is statistically valid to do so... does take the eye off physics
arguments and is just sooo
missing the
point.
You have a greater chance to clarify your
arguments and it's less likely that the adjudicator will
miss your
point.
Ultimately, though, these
arguments are also inconsequential because they
miss the
point.
He has been described as having «a good eye for the winning
argument» and having a style which is «incredibly disarming in its charm — he never
misses a
point, and he's very popular with whoever he's in front of.»
It then feeds this information into a complex predictive algorithm that leverages the archived intelligence of legal experts who've explored these issues previously to compile a list of highly relevant case laws, thereby highlighting potential
missing points of law, or alternative
arguments not appraised prior.
Judge Hart explained that Mr. P's written work was careless «to the
point of disrespectful,» and that the problems with his pleadings went beyond typos to include
missing paragraphs and pages, and nearly unintelligible pleadings and other
arguments.
If that's your
argument, you've
missed the
point.
But some security experts say that this
argument about whether the data was being sold to a third party for nefarious purposes or not
misses the
point: that HIV data is highly sensitive, and that sharing it with any outside companies is a move away from the security of its users.
I'd like to end my take on the merits of the Domino strategy with this
point: The factor that's almost always
missing from the
arguments against this method is risk.