Sentences with phrase «argument of before»

Not exact matches

Entrepreneurship is an interesting lens through which to view one of Sandberg's chief arguments: that women «leave before [they] leave.»

Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.

The suits are part of a group of at least four other cases with similar arguments in various courts around the country, and they make legal experts wary, particularly as the differences in opinion seem to indicate their destiny to go before the Supreme Court.

You can even try doing a little online research to get a handle on what the central argument of a title might be before reading it to boost your comprehension and recall.

In response to a post by a Twitter user which said Musk should provide «some very strong arguments in a well written blog piece to win over the (myself included) skeptics,» the Tesla and SpaceX CEO wrote: «Movie on the subject coming soon...» Now, why hasn't anyone thought of that before?

The Nunes memo misleadingly supported this argument by omitting the fact that Carter Page left the Trump campaign in late September of 2016, weeks before the initial FISA application to surveil him was filed on Oct. 21.

The reasons given by employers for their support of a minimum wage increase were similar to arguments we've heard on Inc.com before, including:

In returning its verdict Thursday afternoon on the sixth day of deliberations, the Superior Court jury also pronounced Jose Ines Garcia Zarate not guilty of assault with a firearm, finding credence in defense attorneys» argument that the shot that ricocheted off the concrete ground before piercing Steinle's heart was an accident, with the gun discharging after the defendant stumbled upon it on the waterfront on July 1, 2015.

My argument is that a significant part of the strong productivity performance in the two decades before the crisis was due to globalization, and that the globalization process may have brought trade in the global economy to a new balancing point.

SEC staff attorneys in the Division of Corporation Finance consider company arguments and any countervailing responses from the proponents before issuing a «no - action» letter.

But, by far the biggest reason that this argument is bunk, is that it will be decades before the majority of the subsidies actually disappear.

An argument, however, could be made that the USPS was losing billions before it expanded its service offerings for Amazon and would, still, likely lose billions if Amazon discontinued its use of the USPS tomorrow.»

Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, presented a more hopeful view of the case to Capital, and suggested that the Florida jury would be moved by their argument that Hogan had turned his own sex life into a public spectacle long before Gawker published this tape.

But neither argument seems compelling, because offerings fell off the cliff in 1997, before either of those events happened.

The airing of Kalanick's argument with Kamel may have been a watershed moment for the notoriously combative CEO, but to many Uber employees, it was clear that the company's relationship with its drivers was in desperate need of repair long before it surfaced.

Indeed, in oral arguments on Sept. 23 in the second case before Judge Daniel Crabtree in the District of Kansas, attorneys for insurer Market Synergy argued Labor failed to prove the current state - based regulation of fixed - indexed annuities is broken, and that the judge should «hit the pause» button on including them in the rule.

I've heard all these things before, from BOTH sides of the arguments.

Such identification is the theme of a famously influential essay by Lynn White, Jr. in the March 1967 issue of Science magazine entitled «The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis,» an essay which prompted a reply by Thomas Derr in the January 1975 issue of Worldview magazine — which Richard Neuhaus, then a political liberal, edited even before he edited This World, the immediate predecessor of First Things — entitled «Religion's Responsibility for the Ecological Crisis: An Argument Run Amok.»

You'd think you'd have a better handle on the issue before you made fun of someone else for having a «flawed argument».

Seriously people... try a google search and rsearch a bit before you make your arguments — all of us (myself included) could stand to do a bit more reading and a bit less talking.

@Vic: For the sake of argument, let's suppose the universe was created by an all powerful being who had existed for an eternity extending into the past in emptiness of the nothingness that was before he got bored and created the universe with its 170 billion or more galaxies and trillion trillion stars.

When the argument from creation to Creator had begun to lose convincing power, even before the rise of modern evolutionary thinking, Immanuel Kant proposed that we think of God in relation to our ethical experience rather than cosmology.

Just before the Muslim woman makes her argument, a minister «deputized by the town» asks the room to pray in the name of «God's only son Jesus Christ.»

This would at least introduce the possibility of approaching the doctrine of analogy without sheer bewilderment, but before reconsidering the argument in these terms, we must first note that the acknowledgment that some terms can be applied to God univocally has very significant consequences.

Before science, there was no logical argument to be made against the presumed existence of gods and the supernatural.

It's a useful book for students who need accurate information for the argument / debate / shouting match at the student bar, for families tackling big issues in passionate kitchen debates, and for quiet perusal before replying to the sneers of office colleagues — or even to the well - intentioned «But surely you can't believe...?»

William of Ware, Scotus» teacher at Oxford, devised the argument «it was possible, it was fitting and therefore God did it» in order to defend the Immaculate Conception (an argument sometimes erroneously attributed to Scotus himself) but it is not certain whether this was before or after his pupil had so brilliantly defended the doctrine in public disputation in Paris.

Pregnancy clinics are a crucial force in the pro-life movement, and the center of the argument before the justices today.

When given a chance to pray before our colleagues, we often feel the need to cover every cause, name every country, and in a marathon of self - righteousness, write every last vestige of prayerfulness out of prayer by making it not a moment to confess dependence and gratitude, but the closing argument of a self - nominated saint.

In this way the ontological argument, by drawing out the presupposition of metaphysical understanding, indicates that the choice before us is between holding that there is a God and that «reality» makes sense in some metaphysical manner, whether or not we can ever grasp what that sense is, and holding that there is no God and that any apparent metaphysical understanding of reality can only be an illusion which does not significantly correspond to the ultimate nature of things — unless this «nihilism» be regarded as a kind of metaphysical understanding instead of its blank negation.

Rather than process a logical argument faithfully, you twist and contort all ideas until they bow before your throne of a priori belief.

It should be noted that the book was essentially written before September 11, and some last minute stitchings about what the war on terrorism might mean for the world and American culture do not sit well with the burden of his argument.

They need to bring their conclusions before the community, lay their arguments bare and clear, and enable the community to see how their thinking matches with the «traditional» and the key ongoing components of the faith.

And, we might also agree that of the seven billion living humans and those billions that have passed before us, that not one of them has formulated a universal and compelling argument to prove the existence of God, nor disprove it.

For the sake of argument we will assume evolution is true and then before life we go back to the big bang.

after a while the arguments are just copied statements of belief that many of us have heard last year, the year before, a decade or more before.

TL; DR: 1) A born again believer doesn't sin 100 % willfully because their Spirit is of God who hates sin 2) The indwelling of the Holy Spirit causes sanctification 3) The indwelling of the Holy Spirit can not be replaced by a try - hard theology; it has to be the real thing 4) Whoever has the Holy Spirit can not be snatched out of our Father's hand 5) We sometimes get into argument over misunderstanding, let us pray before replying and seek the Lord before judging; let us be righteous in our judgement

So if you are trying to point to the «sancti.ty» of life as an argument to support being against abortion you are ignoring the «natural» death toll that God allowed to befall those before proper prenatal care came into being.

Your argument is that nothing existed before the point of Creation... and therefore there was not creator.

Consider both sides of the argument before you assume that your side is the only option out there.

At the risk of oversimplification, then, it seems necessary to attempt a brief summary of the basic arguments we must grasp before we can understand critically the relations between sacredness and everyday life.

Jefferson knew that every state in the Union (except Rhode Island) had a state sponsored religion since before the days of the Revolution, so by relegating himself to the settled national issue, he could not easily be accused of more atheist sentiments.So, what does this mean to the issue of «separation of church and state» for today's argument?

His whole argument, particularly in the last portion of the book, is that they are priests after Christ, with priestly duties to perform, some of which are performed out in the world, and others of which are performed in the assembly of believers, gathered before God's throne on the heavenly Zion — and how dare anyone forsake priestly service on the heavenly Zion in favor of letting a Levitical priest do it for you on the earthly Zion!

I will here only state my belief that it will be found that the primitive kerygma arises directly out of the teaching of Jesus about the Kingdom of God and all that hangs upon it; but that it does only partial justice to the range and depth of His teaching, and needs the Pauline and Johannine interpretations before it fully rises to the height of the great argument.

But the great objection to the argument advanced by Dr. Dodd is (1) the probability that Luke — that is, the author of Acts — had seen and used the Gospel of Mark before writing these early chapters of his «second volume»; if so, he would naturally have the pattern of Mark still in mind.

Before yous ay anything, please include thw wholse scope of a verse, not just the line that suits your arguments.

It turns out, however, that the managerial visions of mutuality are presumed in this argument before the theological mystery of the Trinity is explored.

Before beginning the more detailed exposition, a summary preview of the line of argument may be useful.

For me the difference between the biblical gospels and the later Gnostic gospels was obvious when I read them, even before I was a believer; and there are plenty of reasonable arguments for the case that the four gospels of the Bible are the most accurate historical accounts that we have of Jesus» life.

My second argument is that even if by some measures vast growth does reduce the percentage of the world's population that is desperately poor, present policies will destroy the natural basis for our life together long before they resolve the problem of poverty.