They are also «the provider of electronic communication», both of which give them a huge
argument of immunity granted by section 5 (a)(2).
Not exact matches
Although the Chief Justice acknowledged that this
argument had some merit, the more determinative factor — and the key difference between the statutory
immunity provisions relied upon by the ERCB and Alberta Environment — was that the
immunity clause with respect to the former explicitly contemplated the regulator as an entity («the Board or a member
of the Board...») whereas the
immunity provisions under the Water Act and the EPEA did not (referring only to «persons» in various capacities; see paras 62 — 71).
His
argument on the legislative history
of the Fourteenth Amendment, for example, rests on a strained parsing
of the Reconstruction debates intended to show that the Privileges and
Immunities Clause (which the Supreme Court effectively eviscerated shortly after the Amendment's adoption) was intended to make the Bill
of Rights operative against the states.
According to a May 15, 2018 report by Max Mitchell
of The Legal Intelligencer, in
argument before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court the Philadelphia School District (PSD) contended that it is entitled to
immunity under the state's Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act (PS
However, my
argument is that if they can overcome disease, they are light years ahead
of purebreds in terms
of immunity.
If the court reaches the
immunity argument, it could provide a vehicle to define the limits
of absolute
immunity, according to lawyer Aaron Lang
of Foley Hoag, who spoke with Law360.
We all know that one
of the favorite
arguments of the so - called «tort reform» crowd is that the pharmaceutical industry needs complete
immunity because without it, the expense
of litigation will stifle innovation
of new drugs (see here, here, and here).
For example, there will almost surely be an assumption
of the risk
argument, a statutory
immunity argument, and a waiver
of liability
argument.
The court accepted the
argument of the UK government that
immunity of the Saudi state and its officials from legal action in UK courts, which had been upheld by the House
of Lords, did not violate the European Convention on Human Rights.
Presentation
of oral
argument to the Connecticut Supreme Court on behalf
of a bridge contractor concerning the scope
of a statutory waiver
of the state's sovereign
immunity for disputed claims under contracts with the state for the design, construction, construction management, repair, or alteration
of any highway, bridge, building or other public works
of the state.
The Court
of Human Rights in Strasbourg was impressed by our
argument that he had been denied a fair trial, his right under Art 6
of the European Human Rights Convention, but, by the narrowest majority
of nine to eight, it upheld the
immunity.
The agreement
of the parties that the issue
of state or sovereign
immunity is a question
of procedural law in itself is sufficient to defeat the
argument put by Counsel for the KRG that this Court should not decide issues
of such
immunity, whether as to its existence as a doctrine in the UAE and the DIFC, or its ambit or extent, (whether absolute or restrictive) or any issues
of waiver.
The KRG's
argument that for waiver
of immunity to be effective, it had to be made in the face of the court and refer specifically to the court and the matter in question was rejected on the ground that it was based on what was thought to be the position in England prior to the State Immunity Act
immunity to be effective, it had to be made in the face
of the court and refer specifically to the court and the matter in question was rejected on the ground that it was based on what was thought to be the position in England prior to the State
Immunity Act
Immunity Act
of 1978.
It was held that the agreement
of the parties that the issue
of state or sovereign
immunity is a question
of procedural law in itself was sufficient to defeat the
argument put by Counsel for the KRG that this Court should not decide issues
of such
immunity, whether as to its existence as a doctrine in the UAE and the DIFC, or its ambit or extent, (whether absolute or restrictive) or any issues
of waiver.
The KRG advanced the
argument that for a waiver
of immunity to be effective, it had to be made in the face
of the court and refer specifically to the court and the matter in question.
Part III.A then explores the
arguments for and against continuing to narrow the legal concept
of head
of state
immunity.
This issue however is a legal
argument about the Judicial
Immunity Doctrine and the jurisdiction
of the KBA, and not about my friendship with Judge Bamberger.
At 66 follows an extensive list
of arguments leading to a conclusion
of submission, with particular emphasis on Notices
of Appeal, each
of which included a merit - based objection to the judgment appealed from but contained no assertion that the US courts lacked jurisdiction by reason
of, or that the claims were barred by, sovereign
immunity.
Likewise, the Tribunal rejected the College's
argument of adjudicative
immunity on the basis the Registration Committee does not perform the functions
of an impartial, independent adjudicator, and therefore the principle
of adjudicative
immunity was not applicable (¶ 67).
I have queried if the GMC is up to the job
of regulating expert evidence (see Witness
immunity — the
argument in favour, 156 NLJ 7232, p 1086).