I see a lot of people talking about heat and temperature as if they're the same thing here, then basing
their arguments on that false premise.
«Off - MLS is Off - Base» by Robert Bailey is seriously flawed because the writer bases
his argument on a false premise.
Not exact matches
Over the short - term, unfortunately, there is no assurance that investors or analysts will quickly recognize that this market is trading
on the basis of
false premises about earnings and valuation (though my impression is that those who wake up based
on reasoned
argument and evidence will be better off than those who wake up based
on investment losses).
Basing your defense
on such a patently
false premise renders your entire
argument pointless.
However, an
argument that is based
on a
false premise is not able to be used to draw any conclusion of value.
It is an obvious and extreme example of just what I am talking about; an ignorant straw man and
false premise on which you base your counter
argument.
«Martins»
argument is based
on a completely
false premise,» Pidot said in a written response to the court.
So the
argument itself is based
on a
false premise.
First off, in four years of tracking this card, I have never seen the bonus offer dip below 25,000 points, so the rep's
argument is based
on a
false premise.
The
argument for natural variability is based
on a
false premise, that the world's environment of today was the same as lets say the year 1535, with a small exception of 6 billion people and hundreds of millions of internal combustion engines constantly belching out fumes in the air we breathe.
Also, your
premise has the problem as antecedent to a patently
false claim, as the substantial
argument on my side against the validity of your
argument is not even separated from your claim of its nonexistence by two inches
on the page.
Strassel asserted that Healey targeted ALEC because it is «one of the most powerful forces in the country for free - market legislation,» an
argument she based
on the
false premise that «ALEC doesn't now, and hasn't ever, taken a position
on the climate.»
Perhaps it is just me, but I personally think that humans are at our best when we do not base the
arguments that guide all of our decisions everyday
on false premises, or assign an improbably great degree of belief to a proposition more or less without evidence.
Paul Birch The whole of this unfortunately fallacious
argument is based
on a
false premise: that we have LTE.
TomVonk says: August 6, 2010 at 4:08 am Paul Birch says: The whole of this unfortunately fallacious
argument is based
on a
false premise: that we have LTE.
In its
argument for the existence of CAGW, Working Group 1 employs the negated law as a
false premise thusly arriving at the conclusion that CAGW is proved when it is not proved
on account of the
false premise.
The
arguments presented teeter
on a
false premise: you describe the only possible justifications for imprisonment as,
on the one hand, «because it makes us feel good» and,
on the other hand, deterrence — presented with those
false alternatives, it's hardly a surprise that we end up
on a road which leads to an
argument for less imprisonment.