Sentences with phrase «argument over call»

An innocent man was killed last week when an argument over Call of Duty led to one player «swatting» the other.

The U.S. International Trade Commission this week will hear arguments over calls by bankrupt solar - panel maker Suniva Inc. for new barriers on imported solar cells.

Not exact matches

For Alli Webb of DryBar, maturing as an entrepreneur came down to an argument over a fragrance called Sparkling Ginger.

In a series of responses over the weekend, Trump alternately called Khan's son a hero, while claiming that the argument was a matter of «radical Islamic terror» and also suggesting that Khan's wife stood silent during his convention speech because their religion forbade her to do so.

A cornerstone of Lakshman Achuthan's argument is that four key indicators used by the NBER to make official recession calls are, as he put it, «rolling over.»

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

Can we all just remember this, the best way to convert someone to your argument is not to call them «stupid» or «idiot», its to engage in intelligent discussion over pros and cons of each side.

The justices on Wednesday will hear arguments over whether Greece, New York, may continue sponsoring what it calls «inclusive» prayers at its open sessions, on government property.

The argument of this chapter is that the extraordinary labors to which Christ calls his church today may well be the celebration of the sacraments of Baptism and the Supper, joined to the bold proclamation of his sovereignty over all the powers that threaten the welfare of humankind.

There are no audition tapes or casting calls or rose ceremonies or consent forms or arguments over who is there «for the right reasons.»

Historical arguments between their faiths have rarely if ever been over what to call Abraham's God or who was invoked by that call, and Islamic salvation history is rooted in the conviction that there is a lasting continuity between the dispensations of Muhammad, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the biblical and extrabiblical prophets.

This final part of Griffin's argument for the process theodicy turns on an assumption that he appears to have borrowed by Hartshorne, viz., that the so - called «social view» of omnipotence is the only alternative to the monopolistic (and thus to the standard) view.9 The critique of the latter thus established the former as (in Griffin's words) «the only view that is coherent if one is talking about the power a being with the greatest conceivable amount of power could have over a created, i.e. an actual world» (GPE 269).

Calling names and declaring I smell, even over the internet, is not a good argument.

James issues a stirring call for the Church to move beyond stifling arguments over gender roles and embrace a holistic understanding of God's calling for both men and women.

It's disappointing to see the battle over craft beer devolve into a «who is or who isn't» argument, complete with pointed fingers and name - calling.

I'll call again for a thorough review of Arsenal's finances in an Article or a few that lays it out over the last 10 years, that way we can truly assess that argument.

Check back on Monday, January 30th for Part Two of «A Wellness Wake - up Call,» for strategies and solutions to implementing new wellness policies, and to learn how the Wellness Impact Report can help you make data - driven arguments to win over reluctant stakeholders.

There's an argument in every comment section and name - calling back and forth over the most severe disagreements.

Josh Levy may call this argument a straw man, but I've been hearing variants of it from quite a few people over the last four or five years, and it's always made me nervous.

First Deputy Chief Joe Cecile with the Syracuse Police Department said it is a public safety issue as they have received calls on arguments over the booting.

In opening arguments today, prosecutors called Joe Percoco Cuomo's «right - hand man,» while defense attorneys deemed the former top administration aide, a mere public servant with limited influence over state government.

In a column in The New York Times last October science writer George Johnson likened Hawaiian's opposition to the telescope to the Catholic Church's oppression of Galileo, and suggested that the indigenous protesters were pawns of environmentalists who «have learned that a few traditionally dressed natives calling for the return of sacred lands can draw more attention than arguments over endangered species and fragile ecosystems.»

By tracing the development of what we now call the «scientific method» — an approach, developed over centuries, that emphasizes experiments and observations rather than reasoning from first principles — he makes the argument that science, unlike other ways of interpreting the world around us, can offer true progress.

On Monday, a United Airlines flight from Newark to Denver was diverted to Chicago after two passengers became embroiled in an unresolvable argument over the use of a product called the Knee Defender, which sells for $ 21.95 and prevents the seat in front of the user from reclining.

We're doing 10 episodes and I think the interesting part about it is exactly what you said, everything's changed so much; the line between film and TV has blurred so much over the years, I think Jack Ryan is a product of that blurring so much that I think that they're not even really considering it a TV show, they're calling it a movie that's being told in 10 parts; and that's not just an argument of semantics, it's actually true.

And with «tea party» sentiments riding high (and some candidates again calling to abolish the Department of Education while purging thoughtful folks like Mike Castle), it looks like «local control» and «states» rights» arguments may rule the day should the GOP take over one or both houses of Congress.

Rittle - Johnson called the debate over whether kids should be taught concepts or drilled on math facts a «silly argument.»

But when I read the discussion that took place over the weekend at Paidcontent.org between Mathew Ingram and Laura Owen that is described as a «smack - down,» I scratch my head and wonder if anyone can make something more than an emotional and nostalgic argument to defend a practice (the likely illegal price - fixing scheme called «agency pricing «-RRB- that is just such a «subsidy» model.

Arguments over money and spending, yelling at the kids, receiving unwelcome phone calls at work, these are a few highlights of living life under a burden of debt.

There is an argument flying around on the so - called additional health benefits of a crossbreed dog, over a purebred dog.

It's really funny to read someone making an argument that you might find in a more literary game corner of the Internet (recommending narrative - heavy games like Heavy Rain and Alan Wake, or classics like System Shock 2 over Call of Duty - style military FPSes) written in YouTube - ese.

I heard an interview with Laurie David on NPR in which anyone that called with the slightest disagreement was bashed over the head with the «SiS — let's move on» argument.

By the way, there seems to be some argument over exactly where and how often to call the turns in the PDO early in the 20th century — I have used one frequent estimate but others exist.

Drawing on case studies of past environmental debates such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful action on climate change lower - cost, then much of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on climate change will depend heavily on advocates for action calling attention to a diverse mix of options, with some actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or actions to protect cities and communities against climate risks, more likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.

In the High Tech, Space Industry Engineering Departments I worked in over a lifetime (you know, the people who designed and built the temperature sensors used around the world today) this technique or «argument» is called «magic with numbers» or more commonly «dry lab - ing the data».

-- CREDO calls State Dept's EIS on Keystone XL «coward's logic» in statement: «The State Department's environmental assessment is a vehicle for the White House to test the waters to see if the public will buy its false and cynical argument that the Canadian Tar Sands are going to get burned anyway, and so the government's chief climate scientist's assertion that Keystone XL will spell «game over» for the climate may be true but is essentially irrelevant,» said Becky Bond, political director at CREDO.

The importance of this rebuttal or whatever you want to call it becomes even more obvious when you re-visit the Guardian's take on the Steig et al. article when it was published — «Research «kills off» climate sceptic argument by showing average temperature across the continent has risen over the last 50 years.»

Facing well over $ 150 billion — yes, billion — in exposure from shareholder class actions arising from questionable investments and allegedly misleading analyst recommendations, Citi needed lawyers who could not only excel at what special counsel P.J. Mode calls «the nuts and bolts» of motions practice, courtroom arguments and trial work, but could also provide something extra: «a very mature, very developed strategic sense,» says Mode.

The Court further relied on what it called a «somewhat relaxed» burden of proof in asbestos cases, thereby minimizing the argument that evidence relied upon by the parties would become stale over the passage of time, another policy reason behind the application of statutes of repose.

But during oral argument, some of the justices pointed out that even in rural states police can call a magistrate and get a warrant over the phone in just a few minutes.