This final part of Griffin's
argument for the process theodicy turns on an assumption that he appears to have
borrowed by Hartshorne, viz., that the so - called «social view» of omnipotence is the only alternative to the monopolistic (and thus to the standard) view.9 The critique of the latter thus established the former as (in Griffin's words) «the only view that is coherent if one is talking about the power a being with the greatest conceivable amount of power could have
over a created, i.e. an actual world» (GPE 269).