This is a representative snapshot of
the argument over health insurance.
This past week, the Supreme Court wrapped up three days of oral
arguments over the health care law.
Not exact matches
In the olden days, voters during presidential races would get into heated
arguments over such amusingly quaint topics as tax policy,
health care, and the future of Social Security.
It is possible that the Legislature may take up additions to the exchange once the dust settles on the Supreme Court case, which was in its second day of
arguments over the constitutionality of the 2010 federal
health care overhaul, a key piece of President Obama's first term legislative victories.
I like to listen to both sides of an
argument, look at the facts (not theories) from both sides and especially look at our evolutionary history to see what kinds of foods people all
over the world have eaten for thousands, and hundreds of thousands, of years that sustain optimal
health.
The
argument, in part, was
over the relative amount of control that should have been exercised by
health and safety personnel in NYCC's headquarters, compared with that of outdoor adventure leaders actually on the job.
There is an
argument flying around on the so - called additional
health benefits of a crossbreed dog,
over a purebred dog.
If you look at some of the statistics — like the average cost of an LTC nursing facility being
over $ 6,500 per month — and consider that most of that cost is not covered by Medicare or other
health insurance, I believe there is a very compelling
argument that most of us should consider long - term care insurance.
My resume became less a collection of the random things I'd done
over the past few years and more a coherent
argument for why I was interested in business and public
health and, more important, why I was qualified.