Today in Public Discourse, Maggie Gallagher, Blankenhorn's friend (and former employee), writes a moving personal piece about the Blankenhorn's decision and the ongoing
argument over marriage.
Not exact matches
It wasn't so long ago that gay
marriage was the reductio ab absurdum in policy
arguments over sexual orientation.
A New York Times story
over the weekend chronicled how some individuals and organizations eager to see same - sex
marriage legalized have stopped trying to win others to their point of view through reasoned
argument and have turned, instead, to emotional epithets as their main rhetorical tool.
In that sense, the Presbyterian debates do not feel like friendly
arguments over the breakfast table, or even the more heated kinds of exchanges that might take place in the presence of a
marriage counselor.
What Douglas Farrow's thirteen theses indicate (suggesting thereby a more developed
argument) is that this is too thin a notion of ethics to sustain a healthy ethos of
marriage and,
over time, a functional culture.
As in some
marriages, the
argument isn't always about the topic at hand but rather about a deep seated anger
over some other issue.
But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the
arguments on either side of the same - sex
marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued
over the issue.
At one point I realized that the biggest
arguments my husband and I have had in our whole
marriage were
over what and how to teach the youth group — because we knew it mattered, and was worth fighting for.
The organization of faith leaders supporting gay
marriage takes issue with the
argument over the bill language though, suggesting that opponents are «using religion a smokescreen to hide their intolerance.»
BY LISA KEEN / Keen News Service FOURTH CIRCUIT SLUGFEST: Oral
arguments Tuesday before the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
over Virginia's ban on same - sex
marriage suggest the vote will almost certainly be 2 to 1 vote.
Given the emphasis on sincerity and sweetness
over argument and insight, maybe «defense» [of
marriage] is the wrong word.
Starring Viola Davis as an embattled family court judge with a fraught
marriage of her own; Hayden Panettiere as a recent law - school grad flung into a custody case; and Catalina Sandino Moreno as the single mother at the center of the case who risks losing her two children
over an ill - timed
argument.
Indeed, even many Republican politicians now shy away from
arguments about the importance of
marriage for fear of veering into the debate
over same - sex
marriage.
Malati's
marriage dissolves after fractious
arguments over material goods, not to mention her general discomfort at living anywhere else but within the safe embrace of her maternal home.
It is an
argument as passionate as one can only imagine the fiery couple had themselves during their tempestuous
marriage... This exhibition seeks to intercede as referee in order to level the playing field and stop the incessant bickering
over which of the pair has greater historical relevance.
Over the holidays, there was a family discussion / debate /
argument — don't you just love them — about LGBTQ rights, specifically gay
marriage.
With a majority of
marriages ending because of
arguments or disagreements
over money, doesn't it just make sense to lay - out the finances before you say «I do.»
Marriage Counseling can help you with these problems: communication problems infidelity (sexual or emotional affairs)
arguments about money step parenting control issues mistrust struggles
over family responsibilities blended families substance abuse depression loneliness separation or divorce
Marriage Counseling can assist you to: Conflict Resolution Healthy Communication Create Greater Intimacy Ways to Improve your
Marriage Recovery... [Read more...]
Many people believe that these agreements are «bad luck» before a
marriage, but agreeing on terms can avoid contentious litigation, stress, and
arguments over property division.
I couldn't help but think about the recurring
arguments we have in our
marriage —
over housework (and who does more), money, and even how to parent our kids.