An argument over the truth of string theory isn't much like an argument over race, class, or gender — not to mention sex.
Whenever there is a really intense fight among American Protestants, sooner or later it seems to turn into
an argument over the truth of scripture.
Not exact matches
I personally find this to be one of the most detrimental
arguments for humanity as if we instead of searching for the answer just smooth
over the holes with god like some theoretical putty then we now have an answer and do not continue to search for the
truth.
While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well
over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential
arguments, which are not
arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a
truth that can not be seen.
Arsenal winger Alex Iwobi also revealed he wasn't impressed with his rating, although perhaps there's an
argument as to why it's fair game with regards to him as in
truth, he hasn't really kicked on
over the last 12 months to warrant a higher mark.
That's surely more than enough to leave Shaw concerned
over his future, and in
truth, given his lack of playing time at Old Trafford, there is an
argument to suggest that in the best interests of his career, he's better off finding a new challenge.
That's true, but when the
arguments over the EU are so dominated by fear and half -
truths, there'll continue to be people whose concern turns to prejudice.
I'll take clear & common sense reasoning and simple
truths any day
over complex & convoluted
arguments and reading contrived «studies» ad infinitum.
If we look back
over the film, we can see exactly the same
argument being made here, as were made by Naomi Oreskes in her «Tobacco Strategy» thesis: there were a small bunch who viciously and nastily attacked a bunch of nice scientists, and who cast doubt
over well established scientific
truths in order to control the media, and influence the public.
«Such efforts should be recognized as the act of desperate people who have simply lost the
argument over whether human activities are primarily driving climate change and who can not face up to the
truth.»