Not exact matches
But let's assume, for the
sake of
argument, that Scientology would have an operating profit margin of 10 %, that would put its annual profits at
$ 20 million.
For the
sake of
argument, though, we will assume that Zycher's latest statements are correct and that these three policies will add
$ 55.4 billion of additional GDP to the province each and every year.
Let's call it
$ 2 per share, for
argument sake.
For
argument's
sake, I will pretend he owns only those four companies and invested
$ 25,000 in each of them.
You instigate
arguments and propogate ill will endlessly; all for the
sake of ratings and
$.
So let's just say for
arguments sake the deal is 2 years
$ 30 million with
$ 10 mil guaranteed, are we still interested?
But we'll pretend the first deal didn't have an opt - out for the
sake of
argument, which means Weaver left at least
$ 59 million on the table (that's the
$ 62 million difference between the two contracts, less the
$ 3 million he's earning from the Padres this year.)
For
argument's
sake, let's call this a
$ 12 million car in 2016.
Let's say for the
sake of the
argument that the CVT option (assuming we see that here) could cost an extra
$ 2000 or thereabouts.
If, just for
argument's
sake, we assume the IRA contribution limit rises by
$ 500 every fifth year, then someone starting today and contributing the max would hit the
$ 1 million mark in roughly 36 years.
For the
sake of
argument, let us assume that you would like to retire on
$ 40000 (plus inflation) per year.
Let's add
$ 10K in credit card loans, just for the
sake of
argument.
For the
sake of
argument, let's say I have only
$ 10,000 to invest, which rules out most real estate investments.
If this is not the case, for
argument sake, let's say that the
$ 2,000 dollars I lost was due to a company that I owned shares in going bankrupt; does this mean that I have lost the
$ 2,000 contribution room forever?
For the
sake of
argument, let's say that I make
$ 100,000 before taxes each year in my current Washington job and file as single for my federal income tax return.
For
argument sake, if my son decides to go into the trades and only uses
$ 18,000, do I still get to use the full
$ 7,200 for EAP withdrawals, or would I be penalized at the end of the 3 years because he only used half of the fund.
In reality, just about no amount of money is too small to begin investing (of course, that will depend on whether your broker has a minimum deposit required to open an account)-- but for the
sake of
argument let's look at how to invest in stocks with only
$ 1,000.
Of that amount, let's for the
sake of
argument say that half,
$ 900, was interest.
For
argument's
sake, I will pretend he owns only those four companies and invested
$ 25,000 in each of them.
So let's say for the
sake of
argument you have a
$ 1,500 a year auto insurance policy.
For
argument's
sake let's assume that comes out to
$ 7300.
For the
sake of
argument, let's say your mortgage payment is
$ 1,000 per month.
That tax deduction, after your other deductions of contributions to your retirement, insurance, etc would take
$ 2500 off your Adjusted Gross income, which for
arguments sake here is
$ 45000.
In other word, for
argument sake, let's just say my Rollover IRA does not grow beyond
$ 146K until I'm 59 1/2, can I then use
$ 15,476.40 as non-deductible dollars of my
$ 146K, thereby, only ~
$ 130K is taxable?
Hopefully it's pretty obvious why using this card for unbonused spend (1 Avios /
$) is a poor idea but, for the
sake of
argument, let's assume you're someone who's going to book a few British Airways flights and therefore earn 3 Avios for every dollar you're spending... here's why the card still isn't as great idea.
For
argument's
sake, most gamers expect new AAA games cost
$ 60.
Let us suppose for the
sake of
argument that a ton of CO2 emitting today will generate
$ 20 in present - discounted value of net future damages; this is the «social cost of carbon.»
For
argument's
sake, let's pick the top unicorn valuation (
$ 47 + Billion) and benchmark this amount against the market value of the # 1 rank company in the world (
$ 270 + Billion) *.
The definition of a «high income earner» can vary but for the
sake of this
argument lets classify them as someone who can not contribute to a Roth IRA because of income restrictions which is
$ 135,000 for singles and
$ 199,000 for married filing jointly.
So let's say for the
sake of
argument you have a
$ 1,500 a year auto insurance policy.
«The disconnect was that the price tag of these assets was so high that it precluded investors with less than
$ 100 million, for
argument's
sake.
For the
sake of
argument let's say you owe
$ 100,000 on your primary residence.
Again for the
sake of
argument let's say the bank gave you
$ 24,000 to work with.
Assumptions for
sake of
argument... property value =
$ 30k to
$ 70k each rehab costs each =
$ 30k to
$ 0k ARV =
$ 80k property tax = max
$ 1500 each
Our borrower started with no casino, no land, no building, now has all three valued, lets say for the
sake of
argument, at
$ 14,000,000.