Sentences with phrase «argument with somebody»

Not exact matches

But the problem with the «great rotation» argument is that somebody has to hold the debt.

If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it.

If you disagree with somebody, debate them and show their arguments don't stand up to scrutiny, trying to silence people just shows how worried you are their points might be true.

You visit PS4 articles to disagree with somebody who's arguments are sound and logical just to cause an argument against Sony fans and / or to defend somebody who is trolling on said articles.

My guess would be that's something like the current price for doing all the needed load balancing with contemporary lead - acid battery storage, counting ramping up the lead industry to satisfy the sourcing and management of that much lead and sulfuric acid — in other words, it's somebody saying «it would cost the Earth * to do that» as an argument that there will be no progress in energy storage, so it'd be a waste to build more renewables.

Somebody with a good case would just present it and calmly explain how it further backs up their argument.

First, and aside from the fact that somebody with pink hair isn't asking to be taken seriously as an authority on global matters... This is one scientist, in a novel field of questionable quality, with one unpublished, un-peer-reviewed, argument.

Somebody who DOES N'T get bogged down in the scientific detail but who takes the arguments constantly trotted out by the other side and summarily DESTROYS them with the sorts of hard evidence and facts that the general public can understand and equate with.

But untill then I have to go and stick the end back on my hockey stick, it seem to have fallen off, Once again I will take on false research in the fields I know such as DV and firearms control in any forum I am allowed access to because I know my arguments will win with an unbiased audience, I have seldom seem anyone run away from a fight unless they expect to lose and the way the media has changed recently with even Comrage Kevin dropping ACC or whatever we call it now, I think somebody is expecting to lose.

It'd improve your image if you didn't just «think» before entering an argument but first did some of your own research, especially after somebody provides you with sufficient pointers to prior art.

What I have experienced is careless litigators who have used the cry of «please won't somebody think of the children» as an argument against any claim related to lack of jurisdiction, non-compliance with the rules, etc..

Another argument can be that it is challenging for somebody with little technical experience to set up an Ether wallet.