Sentences with phrase «argumentation in»

Here is the abstract: Argumentation mining aims to automatically detect, classify and structure argumentation in... Continue reading →

The District Court recognises this argumentation in their statement that «it is defensible that, as a downside of this [EU citizenship being reserved for subjects of the Member States of the EU], the loss of the status of citizen of an EU member state leads to the loss of EU citizenship» (Para. 5.14).

It's disorganized, not including information only pointing in one direction — and definitely unscientific... but I keep a file which illustrates both the points which you are making and the folly of using Poisoning the Well Argumentation in any «discussion» which is trying to yield a truthful result: it won't.

A large fraction of argumentation in numerous threads of this site are also largely fighting on, whose interpretation of some ambiguous wording is correct.

The tentative thesis serves as a guide for developing argumentation in the essay.

Dissertation has to be a structural piece of writing and have clear line of argumentation in response to the specific thesis.

Thesis statement should be presented in the introduction; facts, examples, evidence, and argumentation in the main part of an essay writing; your findings and brief confirmation of declared thesis statement in the conclusion.

LDC gave us the opportunity to summarize research about and best practices in studying argumentation in social studies, science, and English Language Arts.

Mathematical Argumentation in Middle School - The What, Why, and How: A Step - by - Step Guide With Activities, Games, and Lesson Planning Tools (Corwin Mathematics Series)

For example, the ELA Standards demand a greater balance between reading informational and literary texts, and stress the use of text - based evidence to support argumentation in writing and speaking.

The study, co-authored by language and literacy development expert Catherine Snow, looked at three multiyear adolescent literacy projects: Promoting Adolescents» Comprehension of Text (PACT); Catalyzing Comprehension through Discussion and Debate (CCDD); and Reading, Evidence, and Argumentation in Disciplinary Instruction (READI).

Indeed, the whole point of Anchor Standards in ELA and the Practices in Mathematics is to establish the genres of performance (e.g., argumentation in writing and speaking, and solving problems set in real - world contexts) that must recur across the grades in order to develop the capacities needed for success in higher education and the workplace.

Via google: «In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually an improper argumentation in reasoning often resulting in a misconception or presumption.»

And so this was also the beginning of years of study and research into the nature of scientific language and how it could best be taught, which was to culminate many years later in a PhD plus a book on the subject: Text and Argumentation in English for Science and Technology.

This goes against prevalent modes of argumentation in modern political thought, where solidarity and responsibility are mostly defined in terms of shared social or political identities.

I'm only addressing the argumentation in your answer of course, not the humanitarian aspects of this topic as a whole.

The line of argumentation in this chapter largely follows Ford's analyses.

It is open to a reasonable argumentation in the political realm.

Moreover, to the extent that it stands up to criticism, it is itself to be regarded as precisely that sort of critical theological argumentation in which I am interested.

This meant that the quality of theological argumentation in mainline Presbyterianism suffered for several decades — some would even say up to our present time.

His history of the loss and recovery of rhetoric in biblical interpretation highlights the publication of Perleman and Olbrechts - Tyteca's The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation in 1969.

I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.

The following parts of this article unravel the natural law argumentation in three steps, showing that the natural law is eminently reasonable and sensible - friendly toour being - in the personalist perspective of participatory theonomy outlined here.

Not exact matches

In the consistency of my argumentation I have won over many once intractable individuals closer to my way of viewing what is happening.

My philosophy department dismissed me as a futurist and the economists dismissed me as a philosopher (A little vindication: I have since had a few individuals contact me and apologize for dismissing me and in review they have found my premises and argumentation sound even if they still do not necessarily agree with my conclusions).

Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations themselves.

It's also important to note that Humanae Vitae deals more with the personal and societal effects of contraception and roots its argumentation not so much in Christian revelation but in nature and reason.

Even when not engaged in face - to - face argumentation, Jews and Christians spoke about each other in essentially disputational terms.

Whatever orthodox believers may think of Kenny's journey over these decades from classical theism to something vaguer, he is at least an equal - opportunity basher: For his aversion to absolutism can equally well be employed against the New Atheists, who affect an apodictic absolutism in their argumentation that makes them as impregnable to counterevidence as anything found in a creationist textbook.

I like the idea of «Levels of Truth» and find that to be a useful tool in argumentation.

In a similar way I think you argumentation with TheOldAdam was largely emotional and not logical — though it had the pretense of reason.

Simply because the organic metaphor has had politically undesirable ramifications in the past should not disqualify it forever as an object for theological reflection and argumentation.

Then, when the skeptic disbelieves in the space ship because of the Chad's poor argumentation and the invisible, undetectable nature of the space ship, Chad asks, «What investigation have you done to disbelieve in my invisible and undetectable spaceship which I can not offer any good arguments for?»

Although I hope not your position, the dialogue you use is similar to the one found in counter-culture argumentation, to develop and build anti-Christian positions and attacks against fundamental belief and faith central to real Christian teachings.

To understand this form of argumentation, imagine Shelly as sitting in a canoe with me — each of us on extreme ends of the canoe.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Although initially dismissed by many reviewers --(here's John Updike, condemning it alongside Hamlet: «an orgy of argumentation... too many characters, numerous long speeches, and a vacillating, maddening hero»)-- Philip Roth's Operation Shylock (1993) has undergone something of a critical renaissance in the new millennium.

Because... in the final analysis... argumentation brings no one into your camp.

As the cardinal put it, «No one today would dispute that, at the time it was published, Humanae Vitae rested on the foundations of a fragile anthropology, and that there was a certain «biologism» in its argumentation.»

I have studied the literature quite a bit, and observed some hearsay evidence from religious parties, and studied the argumentation of conservative Christian PhDs doing research (Yarhouse, Throckmorton, etc.)... but find no evidence in scripture, or in science, of tangible victims due to same - sex marriage.

8.11, both indubitably authentic (See the detailed argumentation on this point in our further discussion and interpretation of these sayings further in this writing re.

I think the dynamic at work here is that many Christians have the maturity level to recognize that most of these issues are based on deep seeded presuppositions, and that no amount of argumentation will changed the minds of those entrenched in their unbelief.

I think the dynamic at work here is that many non-believers have the maturity level to recognize that most of these issues are based on deep seeded presuppositions, and that no amount of argumentation will changed the minds of those entrenched in their belief.

This is where Hartshorne could, and in some implicit ways does, drive a wedge in Brightman's view, because Brightman is willing as a point of method to collapse metaphysical questions into epistemological questions.29 Hartshorne is not so willing, and thinks personalism must employ both inductive (empirical) and transcendental argumentation to support its own claims.

There is good reason to think that the fatal flaw of the indicated argumentation for epistemic relativism lies in its failure to give due heed to the dialectic of process and product — and in particular the distinction between instances of the production of information and the items of information that are produced.

Though this is a disputed issue in New Testament historiography, it is my opinion that this trip was Paul's third visit to Jerusalem after his conversion and subsequent to the arresting argumentation and debate Paul recounts in Galatians 2:1 - 10.

This has resulted in polemics of a high order, in argumentation which is original and subtle.

Examples of these variables might include (1) the diffusion of markets and the integration of vocational groupings into market networks, (2) the technical capacity to produce and distribute printed materials, and (3) individuals» familiarity with styles of reasoning and engaging in rational theological or political argumentation.

What methods and modes of argumentation and evidence can legitimately be put forward in any discussion that labels itself «theological»?

Admittedly, it takes me over 300 pages in the book mentioned above to try to spell out with some degree of adequacy just what criteria, what mode of argumentation, what evidence, what methods seem most appropriate for rendering theological discourse an explicitly public discipline.