Sentences with phrase «arguments i have seen»

This is one of the most outrageous arguments I have seen, and I am curious if this is your own concoction, or if it is something you got from another source.

If someone is, please post (the best argument I've seen is that he's not playing Renfroe over Pirela and that even though Renfroe sucks against righties, he needs a lot of chances to show he can hit them — I happen to think Green is right on Renfroe).

The most adult general arguments I have seen regarding what's been happening are these.

The only compelling argument I have seen for the reduction in fermentable fiber is in the case of small intestinal bacteria overgrowth (SIBO).

As a writer's coach and a successful indie author since 2002, much of what was revealed here came as no surprise to me, and the comments made in the interview were the same old arguments I've seen brought out over and over, which is by no means a criticism.

One of the arguments I've seen against allowing this is that those resellers aren't paying royalties on the sales.

The argument I've seen is that Skeldon is simply doing his job.

I did not say ALL Ridley arguments starts like that, but in recent times, nearly all arguments I have seen have been started by people that claim to be tired of it just because someone even dared to say the name «Ridley».

You think I'm a blind fanboy, anyone with brains who'd listen to your childish insults vs. my thoroughly explained arguments would see you're the blind one, just a pure, pointless hater (who hasn't even played the game, which needs to be emphasized).

The fundamental flaw in almost all the denial arguments I've seen is that they start from the premise that global warming isn't happening therefore the best model is the past.

The most compelling, even exciting, argument I've seen for the United States to engage in a sustained energy quest was that of Richard Smalley.

The only argument I've seen along those lines is the one that claims that the vast majority of the CO2 humans are emitting is sequestered in soils, oceans, etc, or used by plants, but that «naturally» warmer temps result in the release of sequestered CO2.

Virtually every argument I've seen here against that prediction is a straw man, usually based on primitive and unwarranted design assumptions.

I'm encouraged to see how much uncertainty there is in your assessment — it helps to explain some of the endless circular arguments I've seen and occasionally contributed to.

Based on the arguments I've seen, not many, since many of their objection are already addressed in those references.

The arguments I have seen against this approach are all based on fear rather than on cool - headed logic.

Two arguments I have seen are offsets of imports and reduction in green house gases.

While most lawyers still refer to notes during an oral argument, the best arguments I have seen usually come straight from the attorney, with little to no reference to their outline.

Every argument I've seen tossed out there (usually by legally uneduated persons) in support of this ban will fall on its face.

The most convincing «for» argument I've seen till now comes via Daring Fireball's John Gruber, who posted pictures of what Android looked in 2007, the pre-iPhone era.

Not exact matches

But I've yet to see a really robust version of that argument, let alone an explanation of why firing makes more sense, ethically, that this punishment alone is the right one, ethically, than all those other outcomes, or — for those who believe this is true — why he deserves everything on the menu.

Perhaps Facebook simply sees China's side of this argument, and has adopted their point of view in the hopes of one day finding big profits in Asia's largest market.

(See The Curse of Microsoft Excel) I remember long arguments with clients in one of my first businesses, where we tracked customer satisfaction by making millions of phone calls each year to consumers at home to determine how satisfied they had been with a recent experience.

With national security driving the debate, Democrats see a more powerful argument than simply advocating the need to curb gun violence in a country of 320 million that has more than 310 million weapons.

DUBNER: So, to summarize your overall argument about our rise and fall of American growth: would it be an overstatement to say that there was a lot of low - hanging fruit — physical and labor, and all other kinds of fruit that we picked beautifully and ate hungrily, and we did really well with — and that those things, once used up, that kind of gain will never appear again as far as you can see?

«I haven't seen any argument as to why the federal government doesn't have authority to regulate this interprovincial pipeline the way they have authority over all kinds of other interprovincial undertakings,» she said.

The empirical literature I've seen certainly supports his argument — most corporate investment is financed from retained earnings, which -LSB-...]

Although the Chief Justice acknowledged that this argument had some merit, the more determinative factor — and the key difference between the statutory immunity provisions relied upon by the ERCB and Alberta Environment — was that the immunity clause with respect to the former explicitly contemplated the regulator as an entity («the Board or a member of the Board...») whereas the immunity provisions under the Water Act and the EPEA did not (referring only to «persons» in various capacities; see paras 62 — 71).

I could see an argument for having some price controls and more competition.

But I simply haven't seen any real arguments given by the BTC core.

Much of your argument such as I've seen, for your sky fairy (and I really think that is an appropriate term for your obviously fictional deity with all the self - contradictory tales about it in the bible), really seems to consist of a combination of willed ignorance and arguments from ignorance.

When you have an original argument come see me.

I'm not sure I had ever seen a poorer argument against masturbation.

I've seen some valid arguments made for holding a large percentage of bonds.

Other than that, congratulations, that was the finest example of the logical fallacy known as an «Argument from Ignorance» that I have seen in a long time.

You see, the part that is inconsistent in your argument, is that you have no evidence that this god not only exists, but that he is actually a loving being.

... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.

You said, «I would like to see ANY evidence to support your argument that there's no God.

You keep saying that, but all I've seen are versions of the circular argument that your god is real because it says so in the bible, and that the bible is real because it is the word of your god.

I think its an interesting argument, and may have some merit, and I was looking at your writing to see what your response to her point was.

I would like to see ANY evidence to support your argument that there's no God.

If examining rational arguments, perceiving God in transcendent experience, and delving deeply into difficult questions are what drew me closer to Christ, seeing Christ work in the lives of actual Christians is what opened my heart to Him in the first place, allowing me to see how He had been working in my own life all along, even when I had refused to seek Him.

Common people, I saw that my comment upset you enough to reply to me, but not one of you could share a candidate that you prefer, or structure an argument as to why they have more experience than Romney to pull our country out of this mess?

«I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist»... book you should check out explaining the arguments for God and why the God of the Bible is the most fitting explanation for what we see in the world.

Having seen scientists get precious about little things, I would invent my own term and avoid all argument that way.

All we've ever seen in history are the insecure and afraid; people who could not bear to live in the tension of unresolved arguments.

If any christians had a decent argument, they'd focus on it, instead of on the imagined «hate» and «spite» they seem to see in everyone who doesn't agree with them — but not in god, who demonstrates it in every book of his «word» if you but only read without the bias of indoctrination / brainwashing.

Obviously, so the argument goes, if we want to cut teenage pregnancies and abortions we must have access to sexual health services — in other words, teenagers are less likely to get pregnant if they are using contraception; failing contraception, then we should give them access to the morning - after pill, which may be seen as preferable to a twelve - year - old getting pregnant.

But once one has seen that the advocacy of education and science as solutions to the world's problems expresses the interests of those who are rich and powerful and that the actual effects weaken the weak and impoverish the poor, one discounts the arguments of proponents of the existing systems.

I've yet to see anyone minister effectively from a defensive posture, nor have I witnessed anyone who came to faith because they lost a theological argument.