Sentences with phrase «arguments about money»

Arguments about money hamper many marriages.

Arguments about money aren't about money.

That's because arguments about money aren't about money.

As we've read so far in Managing Money in Marriage, arguments about money are typically not about money.

All couples are bound to have arguments about money.

This can mean fewer arguments about money, and may also help you work together in other ways, which is usually in children's best interest.

Solution: Most arguments about money are not actually about money.

Marriage Counseling can help you with these problems: communication problems infidelity (sexual or emotional affairs) arguments about money step parenting control issues mistrust struggles over family responsibilities blended families substance abuse depression loneliness separation or divorce Marriage Counseling can assist you to: Conflict Resolution Healthy Communication Create Greater Intimacy Ways to Improve your Marriage Recovery... [Read more...]

«Arguments about money are the top predictor for divorce, because it happens at all levels.»

Since we started doing budgets each payday together we've had zero arguments about money.

My husband and I have passed this milestone, and have been through major moves, joblessness and plenty of arguments about money and lifestyle.

After all, arguments about money can turn into bigger issues and end in divorce.

In our marriage we had never an argument about money that way.

In any argument about money you will find that you are promoting the value that is important to you, so understanding what your partner values and respecting his / her needs around the issue allows you to move beyond just talking about money and discussing the underlying issues such as a need to feel accepted (status), or feel safe (security) or needing more independence (control).

Not exact matches

But Mnuchin extends that argument about transparency into something more like a rap sheet: take Beijing's money, he warns, and risk being trapped in a debilitating cycle of debt — something that has led to asset - stripping by Chinese practitioners of what the National Defense Strategy calls «predatory economics.»

Forget all the bogus arguments about whether corporations are people, or whether money is speech, etc..

Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.

I have wondered about all of the arguments about the Church doing our thinking when there is no Church requirement to carry a card identifying yourself as a Catholic, no requirement to give money or do anything other than love God and travel as well as you can on your journey to heaven.

the writers gained NO money and power from writing it... sorry... your argument is weak and baseless... and the 4 Gospels were written from about 15 to 30 years after Jesus... pretty ignorant to think it was 40 to 80..

The problem with your arguments is that if it was just about spending money then there's no way Spurs could compete.

To avoid silly arguments about which are the 5 best players we should keep (I mean, the Pipkens versus Donatello Brown debate would be tiresome), I used dead money.

We still got Chambers, Coquellin, Welbeck, Bellerin, Iwobi, time to sell all overpaid and overrated English core, if you're not convinced with my argument just make Arsenal play with all English core and you will see the results and if they really love Arsenal they will stop blackmail us about wages, they don't deserve it.Just think Wiltshire get more money than Coquellin and Bellerin combine.

Kinda blows the wind out of your «formula is all about teh money» argument, now doesn't it?

For example, if the assistant superintendent for finance says that the school depends on the money generated from junk - food sales, an argument about children's health may not be persuasive.

Pharmaceutical companies won't see it that way, and they have a lot of money available, thanks to the high prices of their products, to lobby lawmakers with arguments about safety standards and the like.

And I suspect, I hope, that the money's just simply going to become less important and that ultimately, campaigns make a determination that hey, they might better spend their time with the candidate out doing other things and actually thinking about the argument and the message that you want to send, than constantly raising all this money that buys you maybe some TV ads that nobody's watching but nothing that's gonna actually turn the campaign in your favor.

The argument about what he said, is little different Labour Knew about Lord Paul and did sod all taking the money.

It's going to be arguments about why you're ready, and how you're going to be ready, and all the things you're going to do should you get the money.»

Fox urged House Democrats to oppose GOP amendments aimed at closing that loophole, but made no attempt to directly refute Republican arguments about the flood of «back door» money flowing through state political parties to candidates.

The absence of the information about house movements on the back of the bedroom tax — called a «spare room subsidy» by the government — raises questions about arguments from ministers that the policy was designed to save money and free up existing stock to cut housing queues.

McCluskey, dismissing Progress as an organisation whose ideas were locked in the past, said he was relaxed about defeating the thinktank in arguments and that the furore was due to the «amount of money being ploughed in» to the group.

But their fight could be stemming from another argument with the leader's office about how much money Mr Starmer will receive for advisers.

Considering the currently - awarded amount to the two main Commercial Crew partners stands at $ 7.964 billion — and that's before a single astronaut takes flight — plus $ 58 million per seat thereafter, it's hard to make any argument that Commercial Crew was ever about saving money.

Then get at what drives your arguments by each completing this sentence: «What stresses me out (or scares me) most about our financial situation is...» Is it really about a lack of money, or is it something else?

If your relationship problems stem from a difficulty in adjusting to new circumstances and the changing balance of the relationship, Salama suggests «making an effort to be inclusive of one another as you progress in your career and to be honest about your spending to avoid arguments over money.»

Talking about money with the other half can cut down on these arguments.

Money and finance is the biggest cause for arguments among American couples, so get your first date off on the right note and try not to squabble about whose picking up the dinner bill, sometimes it's just easier for the man to pay - «call me old fashion».

To posit the argument against fracking, a highly likable Dustin Noble (John Krasinski) acts as a roving environmentalist plastering signs about the town condemning the fracking, even accepting a bribe from Global's agents and, rather than keeping quiet, using the money to buy more signs opposing the offers by Big Gas.

Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.

While they're funded with public money, they generally operate outside of collective bargaining agreements (only about one - tenth of charter schools are unionized) and other constraints that often prevent principals in public schools from innovating for the good of their students (so the argument goes).

Well, I think Newark needs good schools, period... This idea of «we have to build charters at the expense of public school» is a ridiculous notion... That's an argument that people are having about real estate, about space, about money and finances, when on the ground, the thing that improves education is what happens in the classroom — is teacher development, staff development, and extended days and, you know, curriculum...

A lack of specificity in how schools spend money may lead to wide variations in quality, which can, in turn, undercut arguments that schools make about needing resources.

We've not only been wasting our time and money and resources in a fruitless argument, but we've been gambling with kids» lives in the name of this intellectual debate about the minuscule difference between public charter schools and traditional public schools.

So, by that definition, Michael's argument of $ 1,000 doesn't even get supported by the people who care most about how much money someone makes.

Along the way, Isabel ponders or discusses: the nature of genius; child prodigies and pushy parents; our responsibility to future generations; the art of judging social cues; insincere compliments and heart - sink friends; dress codes and personal hygiene obligations; arguments about nothing; projectile vomiting; answering the telephone; the criminality of illegal parking; the morals of unearned money; the expiry date of sympathy; when does a reward become a ransom; loyalty to government, country and family; the ownership of leftovers; email expectations; and, of course, clouds.

I'm talking about real TV & real media that's good enough for people to spend good money on and you're argument seems to consist of conveniently mixed up figures between YouTube (where you can watch 100,000 different cats next door falling of a skateboard) and fledgeling real content streaming services (that don't even need Flash) for their minority of TV viewers.

Discussion of «What publishers need to do to continue to add value» soon got bogged down in the usual arguments about how they should spend all the money they're apparently saving through not manufacturing print.

The downside of married life is that arguments are bound to happen, and when they do, most will be about money.

In reality, just about no amount of money is too small to begin investing (of course, that will depend on whether your broker has a minimum deposit required to open an account)-- but for the sake of argument let's look at how to invest in stocks with only $ 1,000.

While there are valid arguments at this time as to whether one should rent or own their primary residence given the absurd amount of debt most are carrying on their principal residence along with artificially cheap money and the boomer influx about to hit the real estate markets across Canada over the next few years it would seem you are okay in that area.