Sentences with phrase «arguments about section»

I also remember the arguments about section 28 and the language that was used in my school playground.

Not exact matches

«The US government acted as police force (identifying the foreign government's crime), prosecutor (making the legal arguments), jury (ruling on the evidence), and judge (sentencing the foreigner to US retaliatory punishment),» Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the pro-free trade Peterson Institute for International Economics, wrote in a memo about Section 301's history earlier in August.

One hates to make old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?

Also, the bulk of the argument in this section hinges on passing percentages, I would like to point to Statsbomb's excellent article about how pointless passing percentages are without proper context (8).

My favorite parts are the section about not allowing your kids to assign themselves roles (even if you're scrupulously careful not to assign roles your kids might do it themselves) and the flowchart about how to know when to step in on an argument and how to know when to let them work it out themselves.

This, after all, is what most political argument inside liberal democracies is about — small economic gains and losses that might accrue to different sections of the population.

After weeks of testimony about bank loans and allegations of securities - related fraud, the courtroom spectator section during prosecution arguments filled up once more — to the point where court security officers began sending spectators to an overflow courtroom.

2) This is for those of you who are getting into some pretty serious arguments with each other about if I had a c section or not... this should clear it up: as you can see from this pic, I did not have a c section.

On the flip side, I'm reading through Early Retirement Now's links about not having an emergency fund (the first links in your «Alternatives to the Standard Emergency Fund» section), and there are some pretty compelling arguments there.

This post begins with an analysis of what actually happened in Copenhagen and contains the following sections: • The path to the Copenhagen Accord • Arguments about whether Copenhagen was a disaster or a positive step forward.

I'm pointing out that merely looking at that one section and using that to make an argument about how the IPCC models treat the overall aerosol issue is incomplete.

However, the presentation is very clear and there is a particularly helpful section on how to prepare for court (with good advice about practicing your arguments out loud) and how to handle advocacy.

Having read the Crown's factum, portions of the trial transcript and having heard Crown counsel's arguments, we are satisfied that the trial judge's comments throughout the proceedings and in his reasons gave rise to doubts about the trial judge's understanding of the law governing sexual assaults and in particular, the meaning of consent and restrictions on evidence of the complainant's sexual activity imposed by section 276 of the Criminal Code.

If you'd like to read the case for Section 702, the House Intelligence Committee's homepage lays out an argument from its Republican majority, albeit one that's intentionally misleading about how Section 702 incidentally sweeps up domestic communications.

Children of Divorce — Provides numerous links for children and parents and includes sections on art activities, books, how to talk to parents about divorce, what to do with anger about divorce, coping with parental arguments, and other similar topics to help children feel less alone and more capable of handling divorce and the effects of divorce.