One of the biggest
arguments against cutting the cord is cost.
The lower capital ratio bolsters
arguments against cutting mortgage insurance premiums, which could give private mortgage insurers a reason to be hopeful.
An argument against cutting interest rates is the twin housing bubbles of Toronto and Vancouver.
Not exact matches
Corporations and the country's wealthiest were enjoying their tax
cuts even more, and the Democrats»
argument against the new tax law as increasing inequality got lost.
The
argument against tax
cuts is weakened by the eight years of Democratic ineffectiveness.
I shall examine Hartshorne's
arguments against the Thomistic attributes in the first group (absoluteness, simplicity, etc.), and show that they
cut no ice
against the Thomistic attributes in the second group.
We're reluctant to accept
arguments that
cut against our political preferences.
Mandelson has won the
argument against «investment versus
cuts» - but that might lose the election, and if there's a Tory govt, lose the recovery.
Labour's
argument was rejected - or failed to get across (partly because it all seemed about # 6 billion this year)- but
against opponents who said
cutting waste was important, but in David Cameron's case that he would reject any ministerial plan to
cut public services.
Prior to this morning, the first, Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, appeared unlikely to prove explosive, while the second, Evenwel v. Abbott, held the potential for fireworks — but only if the justices were willing to accept an especially audacious
argument which seems to
cut against the explicit language of the Constitution.
Raising his voice to nearly a shout, Rep. Brian Higgins last week summed up his party's
argument against the Republican tax
cut plan as the House Ways and Means Committee finished its work on the measure.
The
argument against the BOL's suggested use of $ 11 million from the fund balance — that it imperils the County's AAA bond rating — is a smokescreen for reckless budget
cuts, said Jenkins, who noted that the Astorino Administration already used millions from the fund balance this year to pay a pension bill and has notified the BOL that it will need an additional $ 8.8 million from the fund balance by the end of December to «even out» the 2012 books.
A large part of the administration's
argument against PEGs is that they would lead to billions of dollars in
cuts to services and staffing, including tens of thousands of layoffs.
His
argument against science funding (and science in general) seems to follow
arguments made by other prominent Trump transition team figures: because science is sometimes wrong, or not clear
cut, it shouldn't be trusted.
These are familiar
arguments against testing, cases of individuals who do not «test well» or who fall just below a
cut - off score for qualification.
The problem with this is that his own
arguments against self - publishing would
cut against these so - called hybrid authors when it comes to their self - published work.
The
argument against owning stock that have
cut or reduced their dividend is supported by the historical record.
Whether or not the
argument against corporate taxes
cuts ever had some validity, the world has changed.
(If scientists with such a range of views agree that this work is valid, that seems to
cut against arguments over the reliability and utility of temperature records gathered by weather stations — or am I missing something?)
They've informed themselves of the current
cut and paste
arguments against AGW.
[I] f you want deep
cuts to [greenhouse gas] emissions, you need a broad - based policy, not a hopelessly leveraged
argument against a single project.
I asked: «Doesn't that
cut against making a protection
argument based on near - term conditions?»
I think this emerging form of emissions accounting provides a valuable way to show how the growing coal (and natural gas) greenhouse - gas emissions commitment will play out, but — because of the competing social and economic values embedded in that extracted energy, along with the equity
argument poor countries use
against established fossil - powered industrial giants — I'm not sure it leads to a more effective strategy for
cutting those emissions.
The new paper's findings, helpfully unpacked here,
cut against arguments of those who say flawed media coverage is a big factor impeding progress on climate policy.
The «
cuts both ways»
argument was among those raised by 13 Republican attorneys general in a letter urging their Democratic counterparts to stop using their law enforcement power
against fossil fuel companies and others that challenge the climate change catastrophe narrative.
Perhaps Mr McKibben's role is to act on a project by project basis, but I would expect both he and Dr. Hansen to see the big picture — if you want deep
cuts to GHG emissions, you need a broad - based policy, not a hopelessly leveraged
argument against a single project.