How quickly Luke's
arguments against machine politics were thrown aside after Corbyn won.
Not exact matches
The success he has achieved in this almost single handed fight
against the massive CAGW propaganda
machine is a tribute to his skill and intelligence, aided of course by the truth he has behind his
arguments.
I made the point then (and repeat it here) that although this doesn't «disprove» global warming (the globe has warmed and during this warming we have gone from about half a million cars to almost a billion, from about 500 coal - fired power plants to about 23,000 — I'll let you tell me about the growth in the numbers of airplanes, washing
machines and data centers...), it is a fairly straightforward
argument against high sensitivity of the atmosphere to increasing concentrations of CO2.
The primary
argument I have heard
against this principle is the contention that future
machines will have the capacity for discrimination and will be more moral in their choices and actions than human soldiers.