Sentences with phrase «arguments against my decision»

Not exact matches

Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments for close to three hours Thursday in the first hearing against DOL's rule, but did not immediately render a decision.

(This is organizationally verified by United Methodist agencies» maintaining membership in the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice [RCRC], a political lobby that defends and advances all abortion rights, and that opposes all moral arguments, political moves, and legal decisions against abortion.

The Christian charity Tearfund has urged government ministers to consider the moral arguments against selling arms to Saudi Arabia following a High Court decision.

Supporters of the right to abortion who criticize the German decision make exactly the same arguments — the same Lincolnian arguments — against judicial supremacy that supporters of the right to life who criticize Roe v. Wade make.

«There's widespread support in the industry for the rebate to be removed from NZ producers, but every time we raise this with decision makers in Canberra we run up against the argument of whether removing that entitlement will have broader ramifications on our trading agreements, not just with New Zealand but with other countries as well.

I get what you're saying I really do and maybe just maybe with a little luck we could have got a positive result but firstly my argument is why would you pay # 50m for a striker and not play him and why would you play someone in defence that's never played there before against the best team in England, secondly we have had referee decisions go our way many times but that's just how it goes.

So, instead of trying to make Arsene's stand against these decisions an argument against the manager, let's support him.

The decision left Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho somewhat unhappy and will likely add further fuel to his argument of the supposed Premier League campaign against his side, who look destined to lift the Premier League title.

but the apathy shown those two coaching decisions tends to add data points to the larger arguments against KA.

However, the latest study you've referenced that has you making your final decision to no longer use our BPA - free plastic lunch box containers does not have many facts or a persuasive argument against using BPA - free plastic containers for food storage.

Here are just a few of the arguments for and against each type of diaper to help you reach a decision.

Before you make your final decision, it's worth checking out Mumsnetters» arguments for and against dummies.

These decisions should be taken calmly, after reflection and convincing argument, not in the heat of an emotional backlash against barbarians.

Many parties in Turkey and outside of the country were involved in the decision to not fully invade the Syria and in the end the arguments against the invasion were stronger.

Rudy Giuliani said Obama's decision to come out on gay marriage undercuts the flip - clop argument Democrats like to use against Romney.

The argument against free will is that each decision we make is completely influenced by our previous life experience, so that given a certain choice this experience will trigger us to respond in a certain way, which is not a free choice.

Consequently, a fundamental argument against using embryonic stem cells and therapeutic cloning can not be derived from existing constitutional law and additional court decisions.

In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ of mandamus was rejected in favor of the...

Nevertheless, the parents may take into account the following arguments for and against playing violent video games, when they try to come up with a right decision.

However, shall we not wait to see how many legal cases are brought against CEO's, publishers who tell lies and break contract agreements, before making a final decision on this argument?

In the New Yorker, Vinson Cunningham speaks to the artist Stanford Biggers, while on ArtNet, Tim Schneider looks at the arguments against the Met's decision to introduce a mandatory entrance fee and argues that we should «focus less on political gestures made inside galleries than on organizing for social causes outside of them».

ExxonMobil based its argument on precedents set in two old cases of maritime law holding that «punitive damages are not available against a shipowner for a shipmaster's recklessness» (language from today's decision).

Nor, for that matter, does the 11th century portion of the recommended Polar Urals version of Briffa et al 2013 — which supports the argument against Briffa's decision to use an «inadequate» version of the Polar Urals data, rather than the comprehensive Shiyatov dataset.

Last week's decision by Judge Ernest A. Goldsmith of state superior court in San Francisco offers a second look at some of the arguments being made against A.B. 32, the state climate - change law passed in Sacramento in 2006.

In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ of mandamus was rejected in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People...

1898)(«no one can obtain the exclusive right to publish the laws of a state»)(Harlan, J., sitting by designation); Nash v. Lathrop, 142 Mass. 29, 6 N.E. 559 (Mass. 1886)(«Every citizen is presumed to know the law thus declared, and it needs no argument to show that justice requires that all should have free access to the opinions, and that it is against sound public policy to prevent this, or to suppress and keep from the earliest knowledge of the public the statutes or the decisions and opinions of the justices.»).

Countless times in my practice I was searching for the only decision that said something very specific and which gave me a possible argument to go against a whole body of cases that, I found, subtly inapplicable to my situation.

Lessig's arguments in the case hinged on a morsel dropped by the Supreme Court in ruling against him in its 2003 decision Eldred v. Ashcroft.

The court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case where a Toronto doctor is appealing a Superior Court decision that dismissed his libel action against a former head of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association and ordered him to pay more than $ 310,000 in costs.

That evidence is never tested under cross examination nor can it even be argued against (say in closing argument) since the Judge's analysis only gets revealed for the first time in the actual decision.

That was the main argument made by France Télécom and Orange Caraïbe when they appealed against a decision of the French competition authority which had fined them for abusing their dominant positions.

The judge didn't buy Bluestone's argument, issuing summary judgment against him in an Aug. 25 decision.

This decision provides defendants with a stronger argument for defense against motions to certify classes in instances where the communications in question include solicited communications.

The British Columbia Supreme Court recently released a decision that further supports the argument that Chief Justice Wittmann and the ABCA erred in striking the claim against the ERCB.

The court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case where a Toronto doctor is appealing a Superior Court decision that dismissed his libel action against a former...

One of the main arguments put forward against the contested decision was that Lundbeck and the generic firms were not potential competitors.

Their view accords with my own in any event but, in my judgement, therefore, the decisions of the English Courts do create an issue estoppel against the Defendant in raising the argument that the waiver is insufficient where recognition, enforcement and execution are concerned.

Judicial review acts as a safeguard against such decisions and we have acted on both sides of the argument, often involving an injunction to preserve the current position whilst the Court is ruling on the issue.

Similarly, it is no argument against the position adopted by the Federal Court of Appeal in Forest Ethics or the one proposed by Stratas J.A. in Maritime Broadcasting that deference was given on questions of substance, because that assumes the answer to the threshold question of whether the Dunsmuir framework applies at all to «procedural» decisions.

They have the power and responsibility to explain their decisions, and to respond to arguments against what they have decided to do.

The technical legal arguments may be impeccable but for many the decision will offend against common sense and be detrimental in freeing women of the «motherhood penalty» exemplified in the gender pay gaps which large employers were this month obliged to publish.

In the decision, The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that a fee award entered against a party for making frivolous arguments and conducting an arbitration in bad faith must be vacated.

When decisions are determined by voting the Minutes will reflect the, for and against arguments supporting the positions and individual Council members may request that dissenting views be recorded in the Minutes.

Those on both sides of the argument know the high court's decision in the case — pitting a Malibu homebuyer against brokerage Coldwell Banker — could shake up the industry.