Sentences with phrase «arguments against same»

Secular arguments against same - sex marriage are important, but far more vital are the Scriptural and theological arguments.

Finally, most arguments against same - sex marriage fail to take one thing into account: love — and not just love between two people that wish to live their lives together.

As a matter of principle, any argument against same - sex marriage that invokes the reproductive end of sex necessarily implicates contraception.

A final argument against same - sex marriage is that two people can not become «one flesh» if they do exhibit anatomical complementarity.

I have yet to hear anyone articulate a reasonable argument against same - sx marriage.

If religion can never set secular policy, the religious argument against same sex marriage only affects those that adhere to that particular religion.

«This has nothing to do with religion but with the fact that Romney is only recently pro-life and only recently able to articulate an argument against same - sex marriage,» said Richard Land, the public policy chief at the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest evangelical denomination.

Not exact matches

Saskatchewan's fight against Justin Trudeau's carbon tax rests on the same argument as B.C.'s opposition to the Trans Mountain project, Chantal Hébert writes.

No hard feelings, I would write the same thing if you would have said the same type of argument against a Muslim, Jew, Atheist, etc..

MannaTi, the same arguments were NOT made against desegregation and women.

You can't make the same argument against evolution.

But unless you have an alternative that meets the same criteria as your passionate argument against religion I can not understand the logic in believing in nothing.

Jake, the wild thing is that I hear Christians, Jews and Muslims that make the same «we are discriminated against» arguments.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

Although there certainly are serious moral arguments in favor of same - sex marriage, there are also serious moral and prudential arguments against it.

[Perhaps the strongest argument against Piper's hermeneutical approach to the New Testament household codes is the fact that the very same hermeneutic has been applied to these passages to justify slavery.

I personally do nt care what you believe or do nt believe — I only have to answer for myself... The very same pride and arrogance displayed here was also evident at the trial and execution of Jesus... mankind is still the same... quite an argument against the progressivism of man...

Did they apply the same arguments against the British king and parliament that they used against the French?

A compelling argument against gay marriage must begin with the premise that same - gender se.xu.al preference is a natural, healthy and moral orientation.

He can not distinguish questions regarding the existence of the universe from questions regarding its physical origin; he does not grasp how assertions regarding the absolute must logically differ from assertions regarding contingent beings; he does not know the differences between truths of reason and empirical facts; he has no concept of ontology, in contradistinction to, say, physics or evolutionary biology; he does not understand how assertions regarding transcendental perfections differ from assertions regarding maximum magnitude; he clumsily imagines that the idea of God is susceptible to the same argument from infinite regress traditionally advanced against materialism; he does not understand what the metaphysical concept of simplicity entails; and on and on.

Wilson's first argument was against the cavalierness of same - sex marriage advocates, who propose a massive social change with little idea how it will shake out:

Further, there are strong and logical arguments against gay marriage / same - sex marriage from contexts completely separated from the Bible.

I heard this same argument by many Christians speaking against the Marriage Equality law here in Hawaii.

The same arguments that are used against Romney were used against Kennedy as a Catholic.

The strongest argument made by the proponents of same - sex marriage just happens to be the source of the strongest leverage against their position.

Neil Addison also presented a set of arguments against the introduction of same - sex «marriages».

One of the main arguments used by advocates of gay «marriage» is that the current definition of marriage (as pertaining exclusively to man and woman) breaches the principle of equality and thus discriminates against same sex couples.

The arguments against polygamy don't stem from Jud eo - Christian - Mu slim values against same - sex marriage (values that historically permit polygamy!)

It's tiring going around in circles and hearing the same arguments for and against torture.

The same argument was made against interracial marriage.

Its funny how the same arguments used against Scientology can invariably be applied to any other philosophy.

Supporters of the right to abortion who criticize the German decision make exactly the same arguments — the same Lincolnian arguments — against judicial supremacy that supporters of the right to life who criticize Roe v. Wade make.

Now the obvious Bergsonian objection to this whole line of reasoning is that Peirce's arguments are telling only against the claim to have an intuitive knowledge which is at the same time conceptual.

Against the plausible argument that the physical phenomena described in the narratives require a location in volcanic regions, it is countered that the same phenomena may be given a natural explanation as manifestations of violent storms.

He develops his argument against atypically atheistic Darwinism around the fact of evolutionary convergence: «The central point is that because organisms arrive repeatedly at the same biological solution... this provides not only a degree of predictability, but more intriguingly points to a deeper structure to life...» His viewpoint is quite clear: «Metric - sized animals that are the end - result of many billions of years of prior stellar and biological evolution may be the only way to allow at least one species to begin its encounter with God.

I posted this a week ago to my personal blog and intended to cross-post it here without too much delay, but I've just realized that I never got around to it.There's a particularly bad argument against those who accept the biblical prohibitions against same - sex sexual acts, and I think I've....

The argument against him will be the same as the argument against Johan Santana.

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

This same type of argument was used against Nylander.

yes the same old story but this time with a big difference that changed everything for him and his delusional followers, we've been told all these years that we could not compete against Oil Money and Russian Oligarchs, well Leicester and Spuds shattered that argument.....

Maybe a bit of coaching to our existing defenders would help.But no arguments - We have been very inconsistent defensively all season.Solid and disciplined against Chelsea then defend like Amateurs 4 days later with the same line up against modest (to say the least) opposition.Totally sums up Arsenal.

The same argument goes for Matt Macey, who played the second half in goal for Arsenal against Lens and Ryan Huddart, who has recently been sent out on loan.

Based on public perception, Baylor would likely be a slightly larger underdog against either Kansas or North Carolina, but for the sake of argument, we'll assume the same +180 moneyline in the national championship game.

Well, this same argument can be made against Benz and true, he's not as indispensable as some say he is and CR will definitely not suffer too much in his absence if we bought another striker but we mustn't reduce his work to nothingness and rubbish him at the slightest chance we get.

Same with Vermaelen, even though there could be lots of arguments against changing a winning pair etc..

Your argument about 86 - 87 is the same argument that's used to denigrate Zlatan Ibrahimovic - he scores against small teams.

In Houston, breakfast in the classroom remains a highly controversial issue among some parents, and it appears from the Tribune's reporting that the same arguments against in - class breakfast are being made in Chicago.

But another brilliant woman also shows that the same argument is used against women who claim to be raped by their spouse or significant other — that it's not the same, it's not rape, it's her fault.

On the rare occasion when an English parliament does get mentioned we get the same old arguments against it.

Plenty of us are sick of fighting the same old battles over and over again, and by reminding us how unpleasant those old conflicts can be, Bill and Hillary Clinton made one of the most powerful arguments against electing her president.