Sentences with phrase «arguments against some claims»

There are valid arguments against some claims made as to the age of ice cores.

It may indeed seem that what I have done so far is to offer a tentative argument against the claims of an exemplarist interpretation of Christ's work, namely, that if he is offered us as an exemplar his experience is in crucial respects too relative and limited to offer a wholly significant guide - post to men and women in all the circumstances of their lives.

No, that's not an argument against your claim, but turnabout is supposedly fair play.

One class of argument against this claim is that the law would introduce inefficiencies into the healthcare market.

Bin 5 is touted as being «the best on Staten Island,» and after you're done with your meal, we expect it will be tough to make any arguments against that claim.

This sort of «reasoning» is fallacious because merely changing the topic of discussion hardly counts as an argument against a claim.

If someone is skeptical of the «science» then simply state your case and answer the arguments against the claims you are making with facts and allow them to make up their own mind.

They presented arguments against claims that global warming will cause increases in extreme weather events, sea level rise, vector - borne diseases, and species extinction.

The main argument against the claims Salby professor is so (I think) here isotope 14C (NOAA).

If the EU is far down the statist rathole that isn't exactly an argument against my claim.

The one time I tried posting at CA I had comments snipped or removed for being «offtopic» even though I was simply offering argument against claims by other commenters, which were in the same «offtopic» subject.

If the issue is a breach of the policy, admitting that the plaintiff is an insured may be a useful argument against a claim for bad faith (i.e. not taking an unreasonable position, not adding costs to the insured's claim, etc.).

What I have experienced is careless litigators who have used the cry of «please won't somebody think of the children» as an argument against any claim related to lack of jurisdiction, non-compliance with the rules, etc..

Not exact matches

Mr. Siegal's other client successes include securing a 2016 trial victory in federal court defending Marvel Entertainment against a claim that it stole a patent - holder's design for a Spiderman role play web - shooting toy, and numerous federal and state appellate arguments in criminal and civil matters.

Pruitt himself has played up this argument, claiming that the corruption charges against him are intended «to attack and derail the president's agenda.»

The irony being that he was threatened by the church for going against the whole «god did it» argument, which is what this guy was trying to claim, and has nothing to do with «real science»

The claim of privileged access is not saved by arguing that each of us intuitively grasps this self without analysis or argument, that each of us singly grasps the essence of experience in this intuition, and that the analysis or argument is required only (1) to call it to the attention of those who have not noticed it, or (2) to defend the claim of such an intuition against those who deny it for no or bad reasons, or (3) to develop its implications and describe its content.

Current enthusiasm for civil society is usually traced to the arguments of Vaclav Havel, the Czech president, and others who posited the claims of civil society against the totalitarian claims of communism, and, earlier than that, to the To Empower People manifesto authored by Peter Berger and myself in order to lift up the crucial role of non-governmental «mediating institutions» in public policy.

(6) The sixth argument against the possibility of total non-being is the claim that negation always refers to «othering.»

@neitdarwin — not sure is that an argument for or against, pretty sure Hitler had nothing to do with Christianity, but lip service to look like a «good moral character» plenty of people claim Christianity to look like a good person

[2] Smith holds that the perverted faculty argument, in at least some form, is a part of any coherent argument against contraception, [3] but claims that her argument is more than the classical version of the perverted faculty argument because it dwells on more than the physical end of the faculty.

The atheistic evidentialist would claim, then, that there are no good arguments for the existence of God, and that there are some good arguments against the existence of God.

Though it is entirely legitimate for a scientist, or anyone else, to present philosophical or theological arguments against naturalistic evolution, it can not properly be claimed that such arguments are themselves scientific ones.

As should be clear from the foregoing account, Griffin's argument against the standard view of omnipotence rests on the claim that Premise X is in some way deficient.

It seems that there are further basic arguments which Hartshorne could level against Craighead's claim, charging, for example, that it is a fallacy of composition to assert that because we can conceive of the nonexistence of some things we can conceive of the nonexistence of all things.4 Craighead has in fact anticipated that fallacy charge as it applies in this issue (ECCC 122f).

Now the obvious Bergsonian objection to this whole line of reasoning is that Peirce's arguments are telling only against the claim to have an intuitive knowledge which is at the same time conceptual.

Of the arguments so far examined against capital punishment, only one, the moral claim that killing is wrong, is, in my view, acceptable.

A sustained argument against attributing any uniqueness to Jesus Christ that leads to claims of superiority over others.

Pro-choice feminists who employ an essentialist argument against Robertson will have to deal with an inconsistency, however: advocating freedom to choose to abort is inconsistent with the claim that the mother - fetus bond is more fundamental than choice.

All that would be claimed is this: If we engage in the practice of theological education, then we commit ourselves to the view that it is possible to make truth claims about God and to weigh arguments in favor of and against them, even if they never are and perhaps never can be «knock down» decisive arguments.

He was raised religious and he became religious once again, with only a brief period in between when he claims that he was an atheist, yet I've never seen any of his arguments against God stemming from this period.

Another argument against the banning of junk food advertising to children claims that assertions about causal influences of food advertising on children's diets and weight are flawed because they do not take into consideration other risk factors.

Now, removed from Kaepernick, who is on the outside looking in, with his stance distorted by arguments cowardly trying to look away from the original issue — claiming he kneeled against things that he didn't — and with the spotlight pointed at Trump rather than police brutality, the NFL has decided to protest without really protesting anything.

But another brilliant woman also shows that the same argument is used against women who claim to be raped by their spouse or significant other — that it's not the same, it's not rape, it's her fault.

The Court upheld arguments by Mr. Martin Amidu that the contracts which formed the basis for Woyome's claims against the state and for which he was paid the money, were unconstitutional for lack of Parliamentary approval.

One prominent legal commentator has argued that the case against the church, to force it to perform same - sex religious marriage, is «reasonable»; another has claimed that the church's argument is hysterical.

The argument against BP's search campaign has two main two aspects: first, some articles have claimed that people often don't discriminate between organic and paid search results, even though the paid ads are in a different color and marked as «sponsored links.»

5) Motyl finally claims that realist arguments against arming Ukraine fail because the obsessive pursuit of Russia's interests in Ukraine is «irrational» (his characterization of Russia escalating the war).

I also will point out a few basic examples of how these arguments fail to absolve Israel of the claims against it.

The part the Dems are particularly interested in comes at the tail end of the report, highlighting a lawsuit brought against Grimm back in the summer of 2000 by a former NYPD officer who claimed Grimm brandished a gun and misused his FBI authority after getting into an argument with another man over a woman (Grimm's date, the man's estanged wife).

Andrew Cuomo made a potentially important semantic argument in defense of embattled Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's handling of a sexual harassment claim against a Democratic assemblyman that resulted in a six - figure taxpayer payment.

The papers, which respond to arguments raised by the attorney of the former aide, Joe Percoco, push back against claims federal prosecutors did not provide defense lawyers enough time to respond before the trial begins early next year.

These examples illustrate classic uses of ad hominem attacks, in which an argument is rejected, or advanced, based on a personal characteristic of an individual rather than on reasons for or against the claim itself.

Surely this would be an easy task, if the arguments offered against his predictions are as weak as he claims — this is what his critics will continue to claim for as long as he remains in his «Ivory Tower».

Do these ocean findings finally lay to rest any arguments against anthropogenic global warming, according to news coverage claims?

The argument against whole grains stems from Rami's claim that traditional societies did not usually make use of the entire grain.

What would be interesting about filing a copyright infringement against Shire City would be that every argument they used to defend their use would be an argument against their own claim to trademark validity.

It is not an argument against random assignment to claim that some schools are chaotic, that implementation of a reform is usually highly variable, and that treatments are not completely faithful to their underlying theories.

Although there have been many arguments against a debtor's right to reduce the interest rate on certain secured claims, debtors prevailed in the end.

While there may be reasonable arguments against CAPE, claiming it's BS sort of doesn't fly when your own peaches analogy seems a bit disingenuous itself.