Sentences with phrase «arguments against that doctrine»

But does he have any independent arguments against that doctrine?

Not exact matches

A second line of argument against the presence of any contingent element in God stems from the doctrine that God is Being.

Also, if idealism means the doctrine that mind in various forms and manifestations is all we can possibly know, then I am one of many around the world who find no cogent argument against this.

More specifically, I shall contend that Hartshorne's arguments against the Thomistic denials of internal relatedness, potentiality, complexity, and contingency (of some properties), arguments that I take to be wholly successful, do not, as Hartshorne seems to suppose, suffice also to dispose of the Thomistic doctrines of omnipotence, immutability, nontemporality, creation ex nihilo, and unsurpassibility even by self.

There is at least one: since being is power, every being has some power just by virtue of being; but then it is metaphysically impossible that God should have all the power.20 Or to make this an internal argument against the classical doctrine, the conclusion could be softened to read: «If there is anything other than God, God does not have all the power there is.»

This is done in an attempt to make people who have rational arguments against church doctrine and church history seem irrational and therefore making their arguments invalid.

Peirce's argument against determinism in «The Doctrine of Necessity Examined,» published a year earlier than his paper on evolutionary love, clearly lays the basis for the affirmation of radical creativity and the need for the principle of agape (6.36 - 65).

Arguments against utilitarianism by other secularists often proceed by showing that the doctrine yields conclusions contrary to our most deeply held moral intuitions.

One of the strongest arguments against the crazy doctrine of eternal punishment for the majority of mankind.

«It seems to me that there is a persuasive case for believing that the doctrine of Humanae Vitae, regardless of the pastoral difficulty it causes, regardless of the philosophical and theological arguments thrown against it, regardless of the historical conditioning of its neo-scholastic framework, has been, and is being taught infallibly, that is, irreversibly and without error, by the Church's ordinary universal magisterium.»

For those interested, here's Mr. Colson's argument against the Fairness Doctrine: https://www.colsoncenter.org/commentaries/3628-government-approved-radio

Athanasius and the other fathers who struggled against the Arians for the Nicene doctrine of the Trinity were embroiled in serious exegetical arguments.

«As someone who personally experienced central planning and attempts to organise the whole of society by directives from above, I feel obliged to warn against the arguments and ambitions of the believers in the global warming doctrine.

Stratas J.A. has pointed to a range of factors that may help provide the basis for a more «nuanced» approach to the choice of standard of review as well as strong arguments against an overall presumption of reasonableness: David Stratas, «The Canadian Law of Judicial Review: Some Doctrine and Cases» (October 2017), available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2924049.