Reno develops several lines of
argument against the view that respect for human dignity is consistent with, let alone requires, that liberty be understood as the individual's projection of the self onto the universe.
Naturally, I do not think that we have a Faithful or a Atheist who has not heard
every argument against their view or belief and does not have a counter argument.
In his post «Why We Shouldn't Be In a Hurry to Redefine «Climate Engineering,»» Duncan McLaren presents a thoughtful
argument against the view that the two main families of potential climate engineering technologies — solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR)-- should be treated as separate and distinct groups of climate response strategies.
Not exact matches
Some conservatives tried to fight back
against Trump, pleading with their audiences to see what they contended to be the rational point of
view, but their
arguments seemed to go unheard.
The problem, for Aristophanes, is that there's no
argument against incest from the point of
view of pure reason that works on the individual level.
They already know the truth, and so
view their job as making a case
against any
arguments from skeptics and doubters.
One
argument which has been attempted
against its historicity has been that there are ancient accounts of floods to be found among other peoples; however, rather than discounting the reality of the Flood I
view this as corroborative.
Some hope was offered in a more sophisticated poll commissioned by Christian Action Research and Education, which invited respondents to consider five
arguments against assisted suicide to see if these changed their
views.
Kraus supports her
view by producing an
argument against what she apparently takes to be the only alternative position open to Whiteheadians, the «interpretation of God as a personal order of divine occasions» of Charles Hartshorne (p. 163).
On the contrary, he does not see any legitimate philosophical
argument against the Christian
view.
In several recent works, William Lane Craig argues that there is nothing to commend Hartshorne's
view, that there are positive
arguments against it, and that absurd consequences follow from it (PT 103; PS 16:201;...
There are several
arguments that can be advanced
against this position: first, that there is no need to adapt or interpret the Bible this way because this «modern common sense» is quite uncommon; second, that the current popularity of a belief or point of
view is no guarantee of its truth, so the Bible ought not to be adapted to suit the understanding of a particular time; third, that the Bible can not be adapted to this common sense, because this common sense excludes God; and fourth, that if our common sense disagrees with the Bible, then we must change our common sense after all, because the Bible is true.
If what you read contradicts what you discovered on your own, you must weigh the
arguments that are used
against the
arguments you used, and decide which
view is best.
In this article Johnson provides what he calls a «rough description» of modern evolutionary biology, raises a series of
arguments against evolution, and finally proposes a creationist
view of the origin of species.
Saltzman takes issue with what he imagines to be an
argument against the authority of St. Paul's theological
views on the morality of homosexuality....
Now to the three
arguments against the form - critical
view of the gospels, of which the first was that it ascribes too great a creative power to the community.
For those who
view deterrence as the primary purpose of punishment, the uncertainty of capital punishment as a deterrent provides the fatal
argument against it.
Most God - believers in the rooms don't use their religious
views to state an oppositional
argument against atheists.
Further, I suspect that it is this second thesis concerning the deficiency of Premise X upon which Griffin is really depending in his
argument against the standard
view of omnipotence.
As should be clear from the foregoing account, Griffin's
argument against the standard
view of omnipotence rests on the claim that Premise X is in some way deficient.
So these «internal»
arguments against free will theism are purely ad hominem, drawing upon ethical
views that free will theists are thought to accept but which need not be shared by the process theist making the
argument.
And if we affirm that Jesus was true God and true man and believe that he rose bodily from the tomb, then logical consistency demands that we not use the Enlightenment's antisupernatural, deistic or naturalistic
arguments against traditional
views on the virgin birth, the miracle stories of the Bible, the presence of the Holy Spirit, the future return of Christ, prayer and others.
There is no coherent jurisprudential
argument against it — no principled legal
view that can resist it.»
I have yet to get a clear, cogent
argument from logicians
against this
view.
Of the
arguments so far examined
against capital punishment, only one, the moral claim that killing is wrong, is, in my
view, acceptable.
All that would be claimed is this: If we engage in the practice of theological education, then we commit ourselves to the
view that it is possible to make truth claims about God and to weigh
arguments in favor of and
against them, even if they never are and perhaps never can be «knock down» decisive
arguments.
PS: Don't get me wrong, I respect the fact that you post your optimistic yet contrarian
views on here despite all the evidence that keep stacking up as an
argument against optimism.
It will also look at the
arguments for and
against paying women for their milk whilst considering the safety aspects and the
views of mothers who do and do not donate their milk.
The assertion about the huge financial involvement in my
views is in order but may not be completely correct, as the
argument was not only sophistry but antithetical to building a nation devoid of corruption and goes
against the global warning on corruption as succulently pointed out.
The
argument is prejudice
against complex political
views, general political sympathies and idealism.
The goal of the address was to frame the Democrats»
argument against President Ronald Reagan's
view of limited government.
«Every several years or so a legislator is called upon to cast a momentous vote in which the stakes are high and both sides of the issue are vociferous in their
views,» Mr. Schumer said, saying he had thoroughly heard out
arguments for and
against the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
The Maryland lawsuit proposes a solution that some justices have pondered: an
argument that gerrymanders violate the First Amendment, not the 14th, by retaliating
against opponents who express contrary
views.
Republican
arguments against higher taxes are premised in deeply faulty
views of both human nature and economics.
seriously though, skip - every
argument of yours has failed - religious
views that gays are perverted and sinful (and yes, vast majority
against gay equality are religious minded) has no place in a secular govt DADT repeal was favored in the public by almost 68 % - if voted on, pretty clear the public was approving of gay equality in the military
There are many
arguments for and
against such a funding model, and I've seen it from both sides: from the
view of a small lab competing for ever - shrinking NIH funds, and as part of a major collaboration funded by «big science» awards.
One of my favorite screenwriters, Paddy Chayefsky, once said that whenever he figured out what he wanted to say with a screenplay, he would introduce characters who disagreed and have them make their best possible
argument against his own point of
view.
Also included is a worksheet with
arguments for and
against; as well as secular, Christian and Muslim
views and exam based tasks throughout.
It looks at the Christian belief on the subject and the
argument for and
against from different churches, the Buddist
view on the subject and the impact and consequences of abortion.
They come up with clear and specific
arguments in support or
against a
view.
Whether the purpose is to present an
argument in support or
against a
view or to write a critique, the tone may vary from essay to essay.
Writing a political science thesis is not very difficult for many students, because even though like all other theses it involves extensive research, political science topics are relatively easy and there is a lot of room for
argument for and
against a particular topic, so in many cases writing such thesis comes down to simply finding solid
arguments and proving your point of
view.
The motion to dismiss the case, filed in a New York court, gave a particularly scathing
view of the
argument against Apple peppered with such memorable phrases as the following:
In our
view, the
arguments against are much stronger than the
arguments in favor: we judge the evidence that small - cap companies, in general, outperform large - cap companies to be unreliable.
You note that «USA editorialized» — again another newspaper's
view is not a scientific
argument against WSJ.
(If scientists with such a range of
views agree that this work is valid, that seems to cut
against arguments over the reliability and utility of temperature records gathered by weather stations — or am I missing something?)
The second
argument against mandatory helmet legislation relates to the
view that government may see mandatory helmet legislation as «the answer» to cycling safety, with the result that other measures recommended in this Review (improved infrastructure, legislative review, education and enforcement activities) are de-emphasized or not acted upon.
Therefore, it must also be necessary to argue directly
against the world -
view that motivated this original goal — and scientific
arguments alone can not achieve that.
I guess in your «denialist» point of
view none of the public can have a well educated
argument against AGW.
For a
view from the ground, my friend and colleague, Hans Brenna, a climate researcher currently investigating the role of volcanoes on stratospheric chemistry, believes that the logical result of
arguments against advocacy are a slippery slope.