Sentences with phrase «arguments against this right»

If you're like most people, you're probably thinking of a lot of arguments against this right now:

I can see why it would be something that would appeal to the Libertarian fringe, though I could make a very strong Libertarian argument against the right of schools public and private to demand vaccinations before admission.

Veterans of the last debate think most of these would be won over by a more subtle argument against right - to - die: the fear of coercion.

3.5 Arguments against the right to negotiate Mr Willett specifies four reasons why he considers the right to negotiate provisions do not «redress [the] severe disadvantage of Aboriginal people».

Not exact matches

In a recent interview with Cory Johnson on Bloomberg TV, Cuban presented an interesting argument against people pursuing so - hot - right - now computer science degrees or attending learn - to - code bootcamps.

Against this, Novak stubbornly and convincingly contends that the Founders got it right, that Smith got it right, that Tocqueville got it right, and we» who live in a moment in which their arguments have been so stunningly vindicated by history» can still get it right.

A thorough review of the arguments for and against abstinence programs in Uganda specifically is available on the Human Rights Watch website.

(This is organizationally verified by United Methodist agencies» maintaining membership in the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice [RCRC], a political lobby that defends and advances all abortion rights, and that opposes all moral arguments, political moves, and legal decisions against abortion.

Pete is right that the powerful argument against the 9 -9-9 plan is that it would be a big tax increase for the middle middle - class, those Americans who often didn't go to college and whose lives are becoming increasingly precarious and pathological.

But for all that it gets right, the piece contains one line of argument that Christians should be on guard against.

I think I have heard the arguments mostly from the Christian Right, and others that are not of the CR, but are against abortion.

Despite these arguments against obstructing outsourcing, a laissez - faire approach is also not right.

Only by adopting a highly debatable moral argument pitting women's rights against fetal rights could the court give abortion rights constitutional status.

«I was attacking the argument that gay people must be discriminated against — and anti-bullying programs that address anti-gay bullying should be blocked (or exceptions should be made for bullying «motivated by faith»)-- because it says right there in the Bible that being gay is wrong.»

The argument is framed around the woman's body exclusively, as if the fetus is inconsequential, and pro-life advocates are characterized as being «against» women's rights.

Though he verbally defended the old New England idea, it is interesting that he defended it more on the basis of reason and human rights than on the basis of Scripture, and this defense of congregational independence later provided arguments for advocates of the revolution against England.

Most of the 2012 cycle presidential candidates who marketed themselves as authentic conservatives (which is to say, to the right of Mitt Romney), had very shallow and brittle arguments against Obamacare.

A few misleading accusations against the Bible» on slavery or women's rights, for example» are enough to cause modern conservatives to abandon Biblical arguments altogether.

Gim me a break, what is the only arguments against abortion and gay rights?

Its just a argument that says since both sides feel that they are right than the other side must be operating against the law.

THE PAPAL ARGUMENT AGAINST RELATIVIST RIGHTS

His theological argument against religious freedom, widely held in the Roman universities of the day, rested on the proposition that «error has no rights.»

If you choose to express your beliefs, and I disagree with them, I have every right to offer argument against them.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

By Richard Allen Greene, CNN London (CNN)- Christian activists in Britain are furious at the arguments their government will use against them when Europe's highest court considers whether employees have the right to wear crosses that show over their uniforms.

You are right in your definition of the principle of debate, but that's why we get nowhere with many serious issues of the world, we debate and argue without thought or understanding of the other side, we just learn enough to put together arguments against others.

Their goal is to use scientific studies to bolster arguments against giving gay and lesbian people political or civil rights.

You are only mad because there is no logical argument against equal rights.

[35] Richard Gerstell, The Steel Trap in North America (Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1985).303 f. Gerstell is quite right that the basic arguments against trapping have not changed.

His argument on the legislative history of the Fourteenth Amendment, for example, rests on a strained parsing of the Reconstruction debates intended to show that the Privileges and Immunities Clause (which the Supreme Court effectively eviscerated shortly after the Amendment's adoption) was intended to make the Bill of Rights operative against the states.

When people start demanding that you live your life in a certain way over the MV theory then you can use all the arguments against them that atheists use against god and you'll be in the right.

As one Catholic official puts it, «The rhetoric and arguments aimed at marginalizing the Religious Right might one day be turned against us.»

The Saskatchewan Catholic School Boards Association states: «Their argument is that per student grants paid to a Catholic school division for non-Catholic students is discriminatory against public schools under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Supporters of the right to abortion who criticize the German decision make exactly the same arguments — the same Lincolnian arguments — against judicial supremacy that supporters of the right to life who criticize Roe v. Wade make.

You are quite right in pointing out that I not only make a strong case against gay marriage and against abortion but also carefully delineate the arguments from the other side.

If someone is, please post (the best argument I've seen is that he's not playing Renfroe over Pirela and that even though Renfroe sucks against righties, he needs a lot of chances to show he can hit them — I happen to think Green is right on Renfroe).

Yet many supposedly intelligent and reasonable people acted as though they were entering into a real debate on breastfeeding in public spaces, as though it were possible a valid argument might exist against a child's right to be fed.

Too frequently, the argument against this freedom to choose how and where a woman births is determined by «risks» and often ignores «rights».

Their arguments against the use of chlorine - bleached products are so convincing that one is astonished that the manufacturers keep putting them on the market, that governments continue to permit it, and that anyone in - their right mind would now use such products.

Earlier this week, NBC News leaked an unclassified white paper, drafted by the U.S. Justice Department, outlining the legal arguments in favour of the U.S. government's right to engage in targeted killing of U.S. citizens abroad when such citizens are deemed to be actively involved in plotting terrorist attacks against the United States.

Being recently affected by this I am considering whether to campaign for a change in the law to grant such a right (unless the testator explicitly revokes it) so I am interested in arguments for and against it.

This is an especially effective counter against the abstract «let the police protect you» counter argument against gun rights.

Now, Elia will have to weigh the board's arguments against Paladino's First Amendment right to free speech.

Now, Elia will have to weigh the board's argument for Paladino's removal against his first amendment rights.

«We question the argument the comptroller has given, the economic argument, given the timing, the wave of anti-BDS legislation that is coming across the United States right now,» said Jas Chana, spokesman for the National Coalition Against Censorship.

If Paladino does not step down, as expected, the board will appeal to state Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia to remove him, forcing her to weigh his opponents» arguments of racism against his First Amendment right to free speech.

Not only that, but if the Lib Dems» argument boils down to it not being reasonable for Coalition MPs to work against Coalition Agreement policies, they may have to watch out for some uncomfortable moments in the coming months, should Tory MPs wish to push the British Bill of Rights, recall of MPs, and so on.

According to the Buffalo News, that process could take up to eight months, as Elia will have to «weigh the board's arguments against Paladino's First Amendment right to free speech.»

What are the arguments for and against this restoration of voting rights, and what are political arguments regarding citizenship and the formerly incarcerated?

«The moral argument against illicit financial flows and tax evasion and the strong international co-operation are such that every Nigerian tax payer should do the right thing.