Sentences with phrase «arguments along those lines»

Leon R. Kass, Chair of the President's Council on Bioethics, has presented the most developed argument along these lines.

But she seems not to have recalled that portion of my essay in which I point out that an argument along the lines I've made has already succeeded in federal courts.

We see arguments along the lines of, «Why bother saving the forest if it's going to die anyway?»

You're right about nobody proposing to eliminate or even lower atmospheric CO2 in the foreseeable future, so arguments along the lines of not dissing CO2 seriously miss the mark.

Algebra is the only currency for continued argument along these lines.

I have seen «skeptic» arguments along those lines, and they are just semantic quibbling.

That said, I think that there is much implied in your arguments along the lines that I've described.

«Brian H» appeared to suggest that it was the core of this site to explore arguments along the lines of e.g. a) world isn't warming, b) warming of the world is all natural, and anyway, c) the anthropogenic warming is only small.

A lot of these talking points resemble the argument along the lines of «I see a bird flying in the air.

You are making an argument along the lines of promissory estoppel, but this requires reliance on a promise (roughly).

Not exact matches

An argument for or against the cryptocurrency and traditional money respectively can be better understood by thinking along these lines.

But the kind of thinking he elicits is more along the lines of imaginative assent to a picture than notional analysis of an argument.

That Victor's arguments do not apply to a scenario of this sort may indicate that those of us who want an international agreement along the lines of a modified Kyoto Protocol may have a better chance of success than his book suggests.

Thus, Hartshorne's semantics for the modal operators in the ontological argument is constructed along the lines of a de re modality of temporal becoming rather than a de dicto modality of sets of consistent sentences — Goodwin (1978) is admirably clear on this point in his book.

... though actually, now I think of it, there's a nasty argument lurking in there along the lines of «yes, well, Mary might have been Middle Eastern but we're pretty sure God is white (like Santa, beard and everything) and that's why Jesus would look white».

My argument has not shown that external considerations are insufficient to require a metaphysical reinterpretation of perceiving along the lines which Whitehead proposes.

This argument requires expansion along three different lines.

Then the newly revived argument could at least proceed along reasonably comprehensible lines.

Gowan's work is cautious and meticulous, yet he is able to clearly lead the reader along his lines of argument.

Something along the lines of the Episcopal church statement that h0m o s3xuality is «divinely ordered» I specifically asked that arguments not be «ad negetiva», that is making your case based on attacking and ridiculing your opposition at the cost of positively stating your own argument.

I've seen recent arguments about the quality of players we sign along the lines of «we are signing average players with hope of them coming good».

Setting aside the persuasiveness of your argument, you could still have done that by starting off with something along the lines of: «Ramsey has had a tough go of it over the last few years, but we all need to get behind him if we want to see him improve.

The statement to petition signatories also perpetuated a straw man argument that the Ministry of Justice has pushed all along - the only consistent line they've had - which is that there is no blanket ban on books.

I shouldnt do this, but KOZ stated something along the lines that the other day only liberals were posting, but I am making the argument that KOZ is not a true conservative.

A debate along these lines, with other arguments no doubt entering the conversation, will ultimately decide if Mr. Cuomo gets his way.

Legal experts note that judges» opinions in environmental cases won't necessarily fall strictly along ideological lines, but that conservative judges are often more likely to reject arguments calling for more regulation or trying to fit climate change rules within the existing Clean Air Act.

By the end of the separate arguments, it was clear that the justices were divided, and not always along their usual conservative and liberal lines.

At least in some cases, and especially in the instance of Sir Dan Moynihan of Harris - with its unblemished record of good or outstanding Ofsted reports and its at - face - value impressive performance in league tables - the argument can go along the lines of «they're worth it».

I will use saves as fallbacks when a game really does get hard and I'm dying again and again: this is along the lines of «The Consequences of Consequences» argument, using saves to debug the difficulty.

Because of his popularity, a bad sign to many art world insiders, Wyeth came to represent middle - class values and ideals that modernism claimed to reject, so that arguments about his work extended beyond painting to societal splits along class, geographical and educational lines.

An additional statement along the lines of «all other explanations fall well short of plausibility» would, it seems to me, greatly strengthen their argument.

The only argument I've seen along those lines is the one that claims that the vast majority of the CO2 humans are emitting is sequestered in soils, oceans, etc, or used by plants, but that «naturally» warmer temps result in the release of sequestered CO2.

In this case, science does tell us what to do (reduce CO2 emissions: we can argue about the amount and rate but this argument should be along the lines: «do we reduce by 70 % or 90 % over current levels by 2050?).

Your argument dwindles, in the end, to something along the lines of «we don't know everything, and therefore we know nothing, and so no one can prove me wrong, and I shouldn't change my own behavior based on such ignorance.»

One of the great strawman arguments used by the AGW believers is along the lines of «since you can not show a criminal conspiracy behind AGW, it must be true.»

Of course, there are those who attribute the massive costs and financing considerations exclusively at the feet of anti-nuke «alarmists,» but personally, I'm not impressed by the arguments they make along those lines.

Your argument about potential flows or forcings or whatever is like saying that if a locomotive pulls 100 wagons along a line, drops one at the end and returns pulling 99 wagons then only one wagon moved.

Question: I am yet to find a satisfactory resolution on the argument that goes something along the lines of «the poles are not warming more than the tropics even though «the greenhouse - gas theory» predicts so, and thus «greenhouse effect» can not account for the currently observed warming.»

Along the same lines, I do not find credible arguments that any product of peer review is therefore inherently corrupted by tribalism — any more than I feel that any «skeptical» analysis in the «skeptical» blogosphere is inherently flawed due to tribalism among «skeptics» as a group.

And most his other post are along the same line, with ad - hominem attacks to others, name calling, tagging ideas as wrong without any real scientific arguments.

The deep oceans have by far the greatest carbon reservoir, so a «plausibility argument» could go along the lines of: the upper ocean will absorb extra CO2 and then pass it to the deep ocean.

Further, it is said along the lines of the OFT argument that the structure of the industry with referral fees increase competition and drives down prices for consumers.

Recitals complement teleological thinking along the lines of the objectives as stated in the treaties, or may help to discern historical arguments in interpretation.

If there is a breach of the specific terms of the deed establishing the institution in question under LSIA 1854, there is potentially a stronger argument than under SSA 1841, along the lines of the CDBF submissions in Fraser (No 2), that the reverter occurred at that point.

Our earlier post (and see update) mentioned that Eugene Volokh had written about the contours of a constitutional right to self - defense, and now the UCLA lawprof (at the newly un-paywalled site of his Conspiracy) has sketched a possible argument against the Philly Plexiglass measure along those lines.

Along similar lines, avoid the temptation of simply winning the argument.

Their argument may go along these lines: «I fully recognize that there is such a disease as the PAS.