One thing you should know is that
arguments from consequences are not valid in scientific debate.
# 30 & # 45 — It seems to me, this morning at least, that one of the most crucial defining characteristics of all this is the will to believe what one wishes were true — aka, «
argument from consequences» and «intellectual dishonesty.»
Without that, all he's got to sustain his opposition to government intervention against fossil fuels is
the argument from consequences.
Bill, I am afraid that you are falling victim to the fallacy of
the argument from consequences — to wit, that the consequences of a proposition have no bearing upon its truth or falsehood.
Our enemies have had considerable assistance from the fact that the average American is now incapable of seeing when their reasoning constitutes a logical fallacy (e.g. ad hominem,
argument from consequences...) This includes the so - called mainstream media, who have for the most part forgotten how to be journalists.
Not exact matches
His basic
argument seems to be that although the people
from Adam to Moses did not sin by breaking a command (as Adam did), they still suffered the
consequences of sin (death).
In several recent works, William Lane Craig argues that there is nothing to commend Hartshorne's view, that there are positive
arguments against it, and that absurd
consequences follow
from it (PT 103; PS 16:201;...
I think there are, however, good
arguments to be made
from the natural sciences, which I believe can help us discern unintended
consequences of our decisions including the decision at hand.
But this enlightening article
from a German writer about how Americans are far too timid when confronting prejudice — «at the dinner table, I've noticed, what Germans call a discussion, Americans call an
argument» — reminds us that this fear of confrontation is exactly what preserves the status quo, often with disastrous
consequences.
It's the fallacy of the
argument from final
consequences — that is, if outcome Y is caused by situation X, and outcome Y is undesirable, then situation X is false.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given
from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my
argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter
argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or
consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events
from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
Argument from fear - If you don't believe in god, it's your choice, but understand the
consequences (only christian god apparently) of hell.
The
argument against what they are doing is that there may be a series of negative
consequences from behaving in this way.
From drawing our attention to the ignored but obvious, to making attractive points and
arguments, to drawing sensationalist targets — he has reopened a debate on the foreign nature of the Premier League and its
consequences for the national team's future achievements.
The Guardian also states that in an NCCL briefing note dated 1978, Harman urged amendments to a 1978 Child Protection Bill declaring that «images of children should only be considered pornographic if it could be proven the subject suffered», which Harman says was an
argument intended to protect
from «unintended
consequences» such as parents being prosecuted for taking pictures of their children on the beach or in the bath.
There is also the need for citizens and consumers to be informed and engaged in everyday decisions that involve scientific
arguments —
from policy debates that will have
consequences for their health and safety to the products they consume and lifestyle choices they make.
It looks at the Christian belief on the subject and the
argument for and against
from different churches, the Buddist view on the subject and the impact and
consequences of abortion.
I've thoroughly reviewed Blackwell's study and several accompanying papers, have taken an extensive look at all claimed negative
consequences of dog shock collars and whether there's some good scientific evidence on the pros of using dog training collars aside
from the
arguments made by author Steven R Lindsay.
# 84 Roger, Nice
arguments, they are trivial at best, of no real
consequence aside
from flaunting semantics.
We were rather weak on facts and figures, on causes and
consequences, and shied away
from arguments about practicalities.
Speaking for myself, I wouldn't be bothered with the whole discussion about CC / AGW if there weren't such ghastly
consequences resulting
from the «cure» as advocated by one side of the
argument.
The challenge for the new environmentalists is to emerge
from this crisis of their own making into an era of growing scepticism, while keeping an eye on the
consequences of their
arguments.
From liberating illegal fish and defying European quota regulations to the serious unintended
consequences of hunting and fishing regulations, we've seen plenty of
arguments that ill - thought out legislation can be worse than no regulation at all.
Given: (1) the misery and damage caused to the majority of the population by the problem; and, (2) the law societies» refusal to try to solve the problem, the commercial producers have a strong
argument that they should be treated as equal to the ABSs in providing relief
from the
consequences of the law societies» breach of trust, i.e., their failure to perform the duties attendant to their monopoly over the provision of legal services.
If so, then an authority could arbitrarily (i.e. only in cases it wishes) make use of that
argument, with the
consequence that anybody must first apply for a permission
from the authority before doing any insulation work, isn't it?
Lord Sumption met this
argument with much the same incredulity as it has generally received
from by company and chancery practitioners, and indeed anyone aware of the
consequences for ordinary commercial dealings if it were right.
The
argument that an effects — based approach to jus ad bellum is adequate is all the more compelling when we consider some of the possible negative
consequences of expanding the definition of «war» that results
from the instrument — based approach.
• What is going to happen to your teenager if you don't take steps now to change his behavior right now • Why when you listen to what your child says to you, you are missing 93 % of what is going on • Your teen's number one priority, and why this stops him
from obeying you • Why all the behavioral techniques you have read in so many parenting books never work on your child... and what does work • Why using punishments,
consequences, and coercion will destroy your home • Four reasons your teenager will defy your requests and refuse to obey you, and what you can do about each one • Medical interventions: medicines and natural supplements that have been proven to help with ODD behavior in 90 % of teens • The four underlying causes of defiant behavior, and how you can use them to eliminate arguing, talking back, and abusive behavior • Why most behavioral treatments and parenting books fail to help with defiant teenagers, and why they usually make things worse • How to side step power struggles and why you must do that • 9 parenting strategies that experts commonly recommend that will absolutely positively never work with your ODD child • Three reasons why rewarding good behavior is going to backfire - unless you know exactly the correct way to do it • How you may be helping your teenager to become defiant • Why your teenager sees you as an irritating nag, and how to change that • Five problems that you create when you respond to bad behavior • Why rewards and punishments don't work with defiant teens and what you can do instead that does work • 5 easy to use strategies to get your teen to cooperate • The key to understanding and eliminating the underlying cause of bad behavior • The one word that will allow you to control any
argument you have with your child, allow you to maintain your dignity and authority as a parent, show your child that you are the one who is in charge • Ten keys to coping with a defiant child • How to handle a behavior problem in school • Three strategies that will put an end to homework battles • How to make the teacher your ally to eliminate your child's school defiance • A six word sentence that will get your child to obey you • Five things your child's teacher needs to know in order to be successful with your child • How to change bedtime
from a battle into a chance to build your relationship • How a few properly placed words will transform your child and make him obedient and cooperative • 5 easy ways to gain your child's cooperation • How to refocus to get your child through school and get him to excel at what he is really good at • Why what you say and what your child hears have almost nothing in common • How to really uncover what is bothering your child so that you can improve his behavior