Sentences with phrase «arguments from time»

It is quite usual in close relationships and families to have disagreements and arguments from time to time and to say things to each that are hurtful when we are upset.

As an opinion columnist, I certainly repeat arguments from time to time, and make no apology for doing so.

On one hand, it can cause arguments from time to time, but on the other hand it is good that they are so straightforward.

Not exact matches

For years I'd heard the argument that any MBA that wasn't from Harvard or Stanford was a complete waste of time, and my own experience told me that wasn't true.

That argument is taken from the position of the employer, usually the small - business owner who has to adjust her growth plans to not cross the 50 - worker, full - time threshold that requires companies to provide qualifying health plans to its workers or face the penalties known officially as the «shared responsibility payments.»

Eric's argument, aside from not making sense, absolutely ignores time value of money.

Third, the argument that mini flash crashes played a contributory role could benefit in the future from supplementary analysis, such as parallel analysis of liquidity levels that was time - aligned with the increase in mini flash crashes.

Crowe: You could certainly make that argument, but if you're looking from a growth pipeline perspective, you could even say that Spectra has more upside simply because their development portfolio has remained robust throughout the entire time, whereas Kinder Morgan over these past couple quarters has actually been trimming their backlog.

Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.

Cuban's argument, though forward - looking, is that it would take less time for Amazon to deliver your groceries from a physical Whole Foods location — by drone, van, or whatever — than for you to take an autonomous car owned by a ride - hailing company to a physical store and back.

Those are definitely fair arguments that could play a huge role if oliceridine doesn't clearly differentiate itself from morphine in both of these trials — and underscore why investors may want to keep any position on the small side for the time being.

As one private equity investor points out, protecting under - performing sectors might have been wise in deflationary times (to keep unemployment from ballooning) though as reflation returns the need for productivity to restrain costs could present an argument for reform in the worst - performing sectors.

Other than that, congratulations, that was the finest example of the logical fallacy known as an «Argument from Ignorance» that I have seen in a long time.

to your argument: no, it does not prove the miraculous in and of itself, but now the notion that these were later fabrications (completely separate from the time and events in question) is a factually impossible — a major blow to anyone wanting to dismiss them shallowly out of hand.

It's embarrassing that so many Americans, people who say they believe in freedom and equality, have spent so much time and energy trying to justify being anti gay marriage - with false arguments from the Bible (as thought that should be the only source of their decisions).

Denying that some of these myths sprang from actual people at the time kind of undercuts our argument.

We have not mounted philosophical arguments that prove Christ is really present in the Eucharist despite appearances, or that He is wholly present in each part of each consecrated host; nor have we proved, from reason alone, that He is really present in a consecrated host in the Cathedral of Tokyo and Paris at the same time.

Either way, the argument of what atheism has been done an untold number of times and is usually brought up to divert attention from the subject at hand.

Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than repeat old arguments.

I think people get pulled into these arguments... how many times did the Pharisees seek to get Jesus to commit to» one side or the other» and he would come back at them from a place they were not expecting.

The central chapter on the Second Premise (K 65 - 140) contains: (i) a refutation of the attempted application of Cantor's transfinite mathematics to the domain of extramental reality, (ii) two philosophical arguments which attempt to show the conceptual absurdity of the notion of an infinite past of finite actualities, and (iii) two arguments from physics (concerning Big Bang and Thermodynamic theory, respectively) which attempt to show that probably the natural universe had an absolute beginning a finite time ago.

We can connect Whitrow's argument with Craig's intuitions about counting to infinity, but this time, we will run the sequence from the past to the present (indeed, the past is symmetrical).

I've heard this argument many times from believers.

Part of the answer is that these ancient events are moments in a living process which includes also the existence of the church at the present day; and another part is that, as Christians believe, in these events of ancient time God was at work among men, and it is from his action in history rather than from abstract arguments that we learn what God is like, and what are the principles on which he deals with men, now as always.

All of these considerations do not change the fact that for a long time American society has been organized around the image of the successful white Anglo - Saxon man, nor assuage the bitterness of those excluded from the central rewards of the society because of the fact of sex or race or age.22 Plato long ago pointed out that the tyrant who can gratify every whim is the greatest slave of all, because he is completely at the mercy of his own desires, but he did not mean that argument as an excuse for tyrants.

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

In college I spent a lot of time learning about other religions, but my information came almost exclusively from other Christians presenting arguments against them.

The argument from critics is that giving Jones airtime can give his conspiracies a chance to enter the minds of viewers and get confused with real information over time.

Richard Dawkins» The God Delusion has a subchapter on «the argument from personal «experience,»» but he spends no time exploring the actual experience of God.

The Qur» an opposed such superficial reasoning by pointing out the argument from nature, how the earth is at one time dead and dry and then living and fertile.

Indeed, their full meaning is likely to become more apparent in the future than at the time of the book's first appearance, as thinkers from other world traditions engage its arguments.

That intelligent people get converted from time to time is certainly not a proof that what they now believe is true, and I don't get the sense that he's using the intelligence of these people as rhetorical weight to support an argument about the truth of what he believes to be true.

It would, for many young people, be the first time they ever heard an actual argument for a center - right policy, given from a sympathetic figure, in language they can understand.

Three times, with three verses from the book of Deuteronomy, Jesus destroyed Satan's argument.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

In a footnote Griffin argues that my argument for this is unsound, because I «downplay the extent to which, over time, even very small deviations from the divine aims would lead to enormous gaps between the actual and what would have been ideal in an abstract sense.»

But then I'm not holding my breath — fred has had this same argument time and time again, and has yet to come up with any credible evidence for his particular brand of make - believe — something so obviously rehashed from older mythology.

RB: Chris, you should separate off his Special Relativity part about durations from his Kantian thesis of a transcendental argument that space - time must be homogeneous.

Since the conclusion of a deductive argument is timelessly contained in the premises and since predictions follow deductively from premises stating initial conditions, time is spatialized.

His argument seems to be directed against a certain kind of historical «paleoconservative» who sees a Golden Age in the social institutions or social spirit of some past time; yet his refutation of such a perspective invokes progress in dentistry, rhetorically shifting the evaluative criteria from sociology to technology.

The main problem with Hasker's argument is his attempt to downplay the extent to which, over time, even very small deviations from the divine aims would lead to enormous gaps between the actual and what would have been ideal in an abstract sense.

Both letters are more invective than they are argument; their writers knew that there is a time when scathing condemnation is more effective than calm apologetic; and it is from the vivid and violent picture of the heretics that we must try to reconstruct what these heretics stood for.

The statement is not intended to give scientific precision, but it restates the argument from propriety, this time appealing to things as they are - «nature.»

A proof I incline to prefer is given by von Wright, who does not mention the other proofs.1 In sum, apart from logical niceties, the argument is: a thing can not have contradictory predicates at one and the same time; but, if change is continuous, no time can be found, unless an absolute instant, in which a process is not both p and not - p for some predicate.

Certainly no argument against it can be based upon the fact that every year we are able to move faster from one point to another, and to destroy more human lives with less expenditure of time and trouble.

You can pick up stuff from here and there and present it but the argument becomes invalid because these quotes are not always applied in all situations and many of these quotes were for that particular time period.

But no argument can be made from an «exaltation» interpretation of the Easter experience that it did not involve appearances of Jesus, and within a short time the adherents of «exaltation» had subscribed to resurrection as the proper interpretation.

At times your memory of questions raised and arguments engaged in seminary may distract you from the church's mission and purpose.

It's wonderful that you are getting thoughts from this paragraph as well as from our argument made at this time.

some of it not so good however, because we wanted our relationship to be different from our parents, we wrote our own service and that process was incredibly valuable we had massive arguments and really thrashed out what commitment meant to us and that I think has served us through harder times we are very happy and have two wonderful sons they are musicians Ben and Alfie I'd put a link but I don't know how you can just google them though I think you'd like them:)