Sentences with phrase «arguments had already»

Last week, NH Gov. Maggie Hassan vetoed that bill citing two arguments I had already refuted in a Union Leader op - ed earlier in the week.

Parts of his answer were really somewhat conventional, and similar arguments had already been advanced by various Christian thinkers.

If one has to resort to swearing and foul language then his argument has already lost and as a result his only option is an attemept to get the the one who bettered him to drop to his level.

All her arguments have already been made on the basis of Big Bang evidence (relation between the distance and speed of galaxies, nucleosynthesis, etc.).

Since a critique of their Biblical argument has already been written, it will be only summarized here.

This demand of the prophetic school for humaneness is seen in Deuteronomy's plea for mercy to slaves because the Hebrews had themselves been slaves in Egypt, (Deuteronomy 15:15 [the same argument had already been made earlier, in the Book of the Covenant, Exodus 22:21.]-RRB-

Professor Trentmann's arguments have already attracted widespread attention from academics and policy - makers at home and abroad.

but it wont matter, given the counter argument has already been presented and given the opportunity to settle.

And in fact the arguments you've already outlined above.

The way I see it, that argument has already been well and truly lost: in most of our towns and cities, in our jobs and in our homes, technology is ubiquitous.

I'm sure that all those who have followed this argument have already formed their views on all these arguments.

It is just another attempt at framing the argument, based on the common perception that «He who frames the argument has already won.»

The microscopic argument has already been made (that only self - selected high - energy molecules make it that high, and even after losing some PE, they STILL have the same averge KE left).

I expect few surprises in the Red Team report, since the skeptical arguments have already been thoroughly articulated.

Many of the authors» arguments have already been commented on or dealt with elsewhere (see, for example, / / www.realclimate.org).

These arguments have already been dealt with by Nexus 6, who came across the same arguments elsewhere, but here's the gist of it:

Justice Pollak rejected the Plaintiff's tortfeasor argument, finding that that this type or argument had already been considered in Paramandham (which found that it was not a reason to find there was a genuine issue requiring trial).

Instead, it feels like your set reading is every book ever written and then a book outlining a counter argument for every argument you have already encountered.

Not exact matches

The crux of its argument is that in recent years, Apple has lagged behind, debuting «innovations» on the iPhone that Samsung already featured on Galaxy models that were released first.

Some privacy advocates also bristle at the idea that these new restrictions would help already powerful internet companies, noting that is a well - worn argument employed by tech giants to try to prevent future regulation.

But it's not even 9 am yet and I've already bumped into a number of Fed - related arguments that seem worth weighing in... Read more

This is an argument that some have advocated, but which I don't buy because foreigners are already buying US debt hand over fist due to the desirability of US assets.

The Niskanen Center is already preparing challenges against eminent domain for pipelines that feed liquefied natural gas exports terminals, though the argument has not been tried in court yet.

Other counterarguments describe Fiat currency creation and distribution costs, such as printing bills or minting coins or the cost of building a bank or credit union branch, however the latter argument is less impactful given that substantial number of branches that have already closed and are projected to close over the next decade as consumer preferences switch to mobile banking.

While I'm not persuaded by the argument that Canada needs countercyclical Keynesian deficit spending (I think we're already out of recession), I do know what fiscal policy I would consider worse: arbitrarily cutting spending in a weak economy to balance the budget in light of a revenue shortfall stemming from lower than expected nominal GDP.

The key thrust of Jarret's arguments in various articles on this topic seem to be «people who have much more experience in this than Musk have already proved this doesn't work.»

In these instances, I try to use the US dollar's performance against gold to prove the argument that the US dollar will not have to crash in the future to prove my point because it has already crashed!

I haven't gotten anything wrong, and I and others have already pointed out the philosophical flaws in the argument.

Yes, «bring it on» as if this idiot hasn't lost every argument already.

She seems content to rehash John Bosewell's long since refuted arguments and pretend as if Christian scholarship has not already handled these bad arguments.

And fellow Atheists, many of whom are famous authors, TV personalities, philosophers, scientists or YouTube stars agree with me and have already refuted your ridiculous argument countless times over.

And to the arguments we already have about the killing of embryos, we need to add arguments about the conditions under which we may bring those embryos into existence in the first place.

No argument He made or miracles He performed would have convinced them because the Pharisees had already decided they could not possibly be wrong.

While I would hesitate to engage in a full - out debate of theism vs. atheism on this forum for reasons that I have already stated, I would be interested in hearing your response to the traditional ontological and moral arguments in favor of the existence of God as well as the argument from contingency.

I am open to looking at any credible source you may have but chances are I have already seen it or I have seen the argument before.

I have already discussed the concerted attack upon reasonable argument.

You've likely already heard the arguments against being «unequally yoked» and possibly even rolled your eyes at all the familiar speeches.

I stand by my argument that saturating our labor markets and swelling our already ample underclass with third - world economic migrants is exhausting our capacity to aid the vaster numbers who are left behind, let alone the needy Americans who have nowhere else to go.

Moreover, as Eric Chevlen notes, self - interest often interferes with moral reasoning, and if one is already interested in the contraceptive way of life, one may not be open to Humanae Vitae for reasons that have little to do with the strength of its arguments.

My friend... I do not have to attempt to argue it, the courts have made that conflicting argument already.

«39 Since few people read Lowe's entire 1949 article in which the details of his argument are really presented, I will select a few of the key contrasts Lowe reprinted in Understanding Whitehead, which contains an abridgement of the 1949 article, in an effort to show that Gunter has really answered them already rendering Whitehead not so much Bergson's mathematical alter ego, 40 as something more approaching his philosophical blood brother 41 According to Lowe, however, «it is fatal to the understanding of Whitehead's constructive metaphysical effort to define it in Bergsonian terms.

Naturalistic explanations have already been successful enough in explaining natural order to conclude with assurance that the argument from design simply does not carry much weight any more.

To this characteristic of the probable Aristotle links a trait that we have already encountered: rhetoric, he says, enables one to «persuade the opposition,» not that the orator ought to plead indifferently for or against, but if he undertakes to persuade the listeners or the judge of something, he must anticipate the argument of his adversary in order to refute it.

as for the fall of babylon — there has been so much argument about if it's already happened — or will happen... there are arguments for where babylon was — was it in iraq?

[Dennett's] limited and superficial book reads like a caricature of a caricature - for if Richard Dawkins has trivialized Darwin's richness by adhering to the strictest form of adaptationist argument in a maximally reductionist mode, then Dennett, as Dawkins» publicist, manages to convert an already vitiated and improbable account into an even more simplistic and uncompromising doctrine.

And Yahweh's argument, in addition to what we have already noted, is that he has been operative in history and still is the vital force in the affairs of men.

The basic form of the anthropological argument against the possibility of life after death has already been answered in what has gone before.

If you have a God already whom you believe in, these arguments confirm you.

This argument is that Paul could not have recognized as Jesus the glorious figure which, according to Acts, appeared to him in his vision on the Damascus road, if he had not already had in his mind such a picture of Jesus as could have been gained only by actual sight.

And also it would not be a weighty argument that Jesus does not, like other religious Jews, look in suspense and anxious longing into the uncertain future, but is convinced that even now the turning point of the times is at hand, and the powers of the imminent Kingdom can already be discerned.