Closing
arguments in the case against Mangano, wife Linda Mangano and former Oyster Bay Town Supervisor John Venditto were scheduled to continue on Thursday.
Closing
arguments in the case against Noel Rios, an early - release felon with a history of violent crimes, begin today at 10:30 a.m..
Not exact matches
The first oral
arguments in the string of lawsuits filed
against DOL's fiduciary rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia,
in the
case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
In arguments before U.S. District Judge William Alsup, attorneys for both parties laid out their
case related to Waymo's request for a temporary injunction
against Uber that would force the ride - hailing company to stop testing its autonomous cars.
In the case of Hardin's argument, if the calculations revealed that giving aid to certain countries would result in more rather than less disease and death, it would follow then that to do so would be an offense against love and merc
In the
case of Hardin's
argument, if the calculations revealed that giving aid to certain countries would result
in more rather than less disease and death, it would follow then that to do so would be an offense against love and merc
in more rather than less disease and death, it would follow then that to do so would be an offense
against love and mercy.
The Challenge of Peace, without reference to the logic of prima facie duties, replicates the structure of Childress»
argument exactly: just war theory begins with a presumption
against war, and the just war criteria function to override this presumption (or to show that it should not be overridden)
in particular
cases.
It appears to me to be
in any
case gratuitous to read, as Gunkel does (
in an
argument against the historicity of the event), «dass Elias die 450 Propheten Baals mit eigener Hand geschlachtet habe» (Hermann Gunkel, Elias, Jahwe und Baal, Tubingen: 1906, p. 36).
John, I think the best
argument against Pascal's wager is the fact that he underestimates (
in the passage I quoted, actually) the cost of wagering for God if it is the
case that God doesn't exist.
In any
case, the
argument against Christian majoritarianism influencing public policy rests more on respect for minority feelings than on the alleged disintegration of the majority.
In a more recent work, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier wor
In a more recent work, Reason
in the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier wor
in the Balance: The
Case Against NATURALISM
in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier wor
in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his
argument, and makes clear what was implicit
in the earlier wor
in the earlier work.
This ought to be a reminder that it discloses what will always be the world's attitude to the church and what
arguments will be used to the end of history
in the world's
case against it.
One of the strongest
arguments in recent years for abolishing the death penalty has arisen, not from the moral prohibition
against the taking of life, but from the fact that with rare exceptions those who are executed are people who lack the means to secure good legal assistance, or lack the educational background to make full use of such assistance, or lack the social status which brings the
case to public attention.11
You are quite right
in pointing out that I not only make a strong
case against gay marriage and
against abortion but also carefully delineate the
arguments from the other side.
The where is God question
in this
case is used as an
argument against God: if he is who you say he is, why would this happen?
Many of the objections put forward by pro-life agencies
in Britain
against recent euthanasia Bills gave precedence to the «thin end of the wedge» type of
argument, often pointing to Holland as a worst
case example.
(Simplistic
arguments against all forms of cosleeping,
in this
case, do not make sense, nor are the recommendations «practical» for those for whom they are intended.)
Apart from the
argument that we have a moral duty to help those who wish to come to this country (which you may or may not accept), there is an economic
case in favour of immigration
in that the economy benefits from the availability of cheap labour, and there is a
case against in that growth
in population especially
in the crowded South - East creates a lot of pressure on infrastructure such as housing, transport, hospitals, and schools (and the growth
in population is largely due to immigration).
In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»
In a celebrated
case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»
in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson,
against the strong
argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact».
Labour's
argument was rejected - or failed to get across (partly because it all seemed about # 6 billion this year)- but
against opponents who said cutting waste was important, but
in David Cameron's
case that he would reject any ministerial plan to cut public services.
Opening
arguments began Monday
in the
case against John Haggerty, a Queens political operative and Bloomberg campaign volunteer who is accused of stealing $ 1.1 million of the mayor's money
in 2009.
Sunder:
In the interests of intellectual strictness I have qualified the comment about the lack of intellectual and moral case against PR to refer specifically to the two lines of argument featured in the pos
In the interests of intellectual strictness I have qualified the comment about the lack of intellectual and moral
case against PR to refer specifically to the two lines of
argument featured
in the pos
in the post.
Prosecutors made their closing
arguments Monday
in the public corruption
case against Sheldon Silver, the former state Assembly speaker with extremely close ties to the real estate industry.
Federal prosecutors, bent on telling a story of public corruption, used cherry - picked evidence, untrustworthy witnesses and innuendo to build a
case against former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son, Adam, lawyers for the men said
in closing
arguments yesterday.
«It's just surreal,» said Jaron Benjamin a week after the conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and on the day of closing
arguments in the federal corruption
case against former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, knowing that those
cases may have been bolstered by work he did years ago
in the fight to strengthen the state's rent laws.
MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT — «Power, greed, corruption» are at the heart of the
case against former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, federal prosecutors said Tuesday during opening
arguments in the trial.
During closing
arguments in the corruption trial
against state Sen. Dean Skelos and his son, Adam, a lawyer for the younger Skelos told jurors that the government's
case against the former majority leader relies on burdening the jury with heaps of emails, phone calls and witness testimony to distract jurors from the lack of a supposed smoking gun.
Without indicating what action he might take
in the Ivy
case, Soares insisted he was working to prevent a defense attorney from raising a potentially disastrous legal
argument against any district attorney who might bring charges
in a
case that falls into what Soares characterized as the executive order's ample ambiguities.
In a 90 - minute closing
argument, Christopher P. Conniff, a defense lawyer, told jurors that the
case against State Senator Dean G. Skelos and his son, Adam, amounted to little more than distractions, snippets of conversations taken out of context, and self - serving lies from two central witnesses.
Pawa also led the plaintiffs
in a 2008
case, Kivalina v. Exxon Mobil Corp.,
in which an Alaskan village made
arguments against Exxon similar to those that Oakland and San Francisco are making now.
So if you ever want to see if we have a problem
in policing related to race, pay related to gender or a problem with violence
against transgender individuals,
in all of those
cases it becomes impossible to make a scientific
argument — because if those categories are never recorded
in official documents, you can never do the data collection to show what's true.
But where treatment choice is
in dispute, the usual situation places CAM practitioners
against the rest of the medical personnel,
in which
case they need to have a good line of
arguments and a good and widely accepted reputation.
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, who earlier had ruled
against the National Institutes of Health, this time came down on NIH's side
in several key
arguments in the
case.
There is really no valid
argument against using a 1 / S ^ 2 prior
in cases like Forster & Gregory, 2006 and Gregory et al, 2002, and that is what frequentist statistical methods implicitly use.
«The
Case Against 8,» with its intimate
argument in favor of humanity, could have something to teach the prosecutors leading that fight.
These
arguments are not
against professional judgment per se, but
against its misuse
in this
case.
Steve Morrison's voice shook with the weight of South Carolina's history as he closed his
arguments against the state last month
in the key trial of an 11 - year - old school finance
case.
We realize it's a lawyer's job to throw everything
against the wall
in an attempt to get a
case tossed without even having to fight it on the merits, but New York's
arguments fail a basic smell test.
Separately, last week Barnes & Noble (s BKS) and the American Booksellers Association requested permission to file an amici curiae, or «friend of the court,» brief
in the
case, saying that «if the Court were not to permit ABA and Barnes & Noble to serve as amici
in this matter, it is likely that DOJ's numerous
arguments in that filing that are specifically directed
against Barnes & Noble and ABA, complete with their factual inaccuracies, would go unrebutted by any party currently before the Court.»
After being fired from her post as Chief of the Special Victims Unit for refusing to «go along to get along,» Alice Vachss published the incendiary Sex Crimes, described as «a stark, passionate closing
argument in [her] broader
case against the criminal justice system» by the NY Times, which named it as a Notable Book of the Year.
But it is the
arguments we are seeing now
against the proposed settlement
in the price fixing collusion
case against Apple and five of the big six publishers.
Writing a political science thesis is not very difficult for many students, because even though like all other theses it involves extensive research, political science topics are relatively easy and there is a lot of room for
argument for and
against a particular topic, so
in many
cases writing such thesis comes down to simply finding solid
arguments and proving your point of view.
The motion to dismiss the
case, filed
in a New York court, gave a particularly scathing view of the
argument against Apple peppered with such memorable phrases as the following:
I think it's more of a
case of Microsoft syndrome where he late to the market
in an exploding growth area than any real
argument against ETFs.
Here's the essential
case both
in favour and
against locking
in; only you can decide which
argument feels right to you.
A federal judge heard
arguments in the
case last week and said he would decide this week whether to issue a permanent injunction
against Ohio State, allowing Entine and her 8 - year - old Cavalier King Charles spaniel to stay at the sorority house.
There is one
argument in favor of emulation that even the game industry has a hard time making a
case against.
As students looked to Peter Cooper's words to support their
case against tuition, President Bharucha —
in speeches, radio interviews, and meetings with alumni and stakeholders — invoked Cooper to support another
argument.
ExxonMobil based its
argument on precedents set
in two old
cases of maritime law holding that «punitive damages are not available
against a shipowner for a shipmaster's recklessness» (language from today's decision).
A valuable short paper that has been accepted for publication
in Geophysical Research Letters (subscription required) makes a strong
case against presenting any
argument about human - driven global warming that's based on short - term trends (a decade or so).
I personally think that's a negligible effect, but should I argue that it could be thousands of times bigger, making it a good
argument against (I guess
in this
case) ozone depletion?