Not exact matches
«It is the
case in Oxford and Cambridge Union debating
contests that the competitors are given one side of the
argument to debate blind, and so may have to argue a
case they oppose, as I remember from my own first year efforts at Oxford» What a curious remark to make!
In contrast, a
contested case hearing is the equivalent of a bench trial — briefing, witnesses, oral
argument, etc..
However, the General Court accepted Gifi's
argument that the Board failed to examine all the evidence it had produced, and the Board's judgment did not mention several of the designs cited: «
In the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raqu
In the present
case, it is clear that,
in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raqu
in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity
in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raqu
in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the
contested design
in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raqu
in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the
contested decision, or the context
in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.&raqu
in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.»
31 It follows that,
in the light of all of the elements of the present
case -LSB-...] Evropaïki Dynamiki's
argument alleging that the statement of reasons for the
contested decisions was inadequate had to be rejected.
44
In this
case, the Board of Appeal's reasoning rejecting the
argument based on the allegedly descriptive character of the «doughnuts» element of the trade mark was sufficient to enable the applicant to understand the reasons that had led the Board of Appeal to adopt the
contested decision and to enable the Court to exercise its power of review.
HHJ Parker accepted D's
arguments that,
in reality, the great majority of the costs incurred by both parties were
in relation to C's main
case (the splenectomy) and that C had lost every
contested issue at trial.
Successful representation of a second globally - ranked Chinese infrastructure company
in connection with
contested sanctions proceedings by The World Bank, including
argument before the Sanctions Board, resulting
in no debarment of the company (Sanctions Board Decision No. 88 (Sanctions
Case No. 372) issued on June 29, 2016)
Most highly -
contested divorce
cases settle before trial, after the parties have spent $ 20,000 to $ 40,000
in attorney fees, particularly if several months of
argument takes place before a trial.