Sentences with phrase «arguments in a case out»

The High Court Tuesday started hearing arguments in a case out of Wisconsin involving gerrymandering, the much - criticized practice of drawing up legislative boundaries to benefit one political party.

Not exact matches

In arguments before U.S. District Judge William Alsup, attorneys for both parties laid out their case related to Waymo's request for a temporary injunction against Uber that would force the ride - hailing company to stop testing its autonomous cars.

Amid the flurry of essays on religious liberty occasioned by the Supreme Court's hearing arguments in the Hobby Lobby case, these two sentences from Rick Warren's otherwise excellent op - ed in the Washington Post stood out to me:

Heck, by your SAME argument, you should believe in Odin, Ra, Zeus, and Quetzlcoatl «just in case» they turn out to be right.

While this last argument has a distinguished pedigree, Stark puts the case in boldest terms: «All that 18th - century philosophizing on things like individualism and liberty was coming straight out of 1,800 years of Christianity.»

He makes a similar argument to yours that it is ok to slaughter even infants and children, if that is what your god wants in cases where he doesn't want do do the terrible deeds himself, as he did when he supposedly wiped out almost all of humanity with a flood or sent a plague to kill 70,000 Israelites (2 Samuel 24:1 - 15), because David conducted a census, Yahweh caused him to conduct.

I also thank Kristen Robinson Doe for citing particular cases of great relevance to my argument — although it should also be mentioned that political philosophy is one surviving sub-discipline (my own, it turns out) in which the big questions can still be explored.

To this end his favorite device is to picture a cosmic assize in which Yahweh is at once plaintiff and judge; he advances his arguments and introduces his witnesses and then challenges the defendants to make out their case.

You are quite right in pointing out that I not only make a strong case against gay marriage and against abortion but also carefully delineate the arguments from the other side.

Lord Herman Ouseley, the chairman of anti-racism organisation Kick It Out, drew a comparison with the case of former Aston Villa defender and Kick It Out trustee Paul Elliott, who resigned after using a racial slur in a private argument.

Wenger can not abide arguments within the club and will go out of his way to avoid making key decisions in case it upsets so and so.

Caring was simply pointing out what is obvious, mainly that you are more interested in making your case by kicking a woman who is already down than you are making a reasoned argument.

Not sure the Falkland Islands or Tibet are the best examples for a «no effect in practice» argument given the violence in both cases and all out war in the former.

Attorneys laid out their arguments in the state corruption case involving Joseph Percoco, top aide to Gov Andrew Cuomo, and Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi, executives for Fayetteville - based Cor Development Co..

Deondra Brown said arguments that opening a one - year window to revive old cases would cause a flood of legal cases has not been borne out in other states.

The government's lawyers are due to lay out their argument in more detail tomorrow but at an initial hearing earlier this month, they claimed that a first tier tribunal only has the power to identify that legislation is incompatible with the Human Rights Act - not to rule on a case on that basis.

Braun's ruling points out that an attorney representing Cuomo and LG Bob Duffy did not appear for oral argument in the case, but did respond to the petition.

In a 90 - minute closing argument, Christopher P. Conniff, a defense lawyer, told jurors that the case against State Senator Dean G. Skelos and his son, Adam, amounted to little more than distractions, snippets of conversations taken out of context, and self - serving lies from two central witnesses.

Best - case scenario: The movie inspires heated arguments about which of its two stars shines brighter, which rage on until someone sensibly points out that it doesn't really matter, since they're both fantastic, and Carol is much more than the sum of its performances in any case.

And that is why they and other charter supporters will be out again making noise Wednesday as a Rochester court hears arguments in this case.

Pointing out that «states with constitutional provisions similar to ours have uniformly rejected the notion that schools are not aided by tuition payments,» the court in this case rejected the argument that the voucher payments merely represent indirect aid to private schools because they go to students and their parents, who then make the payment to the schools.

On the day that the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association union membership case, U.S. Congressman Mark Pocan gave a shout - out on his Facebook page to Beloit Education Association President Tim Vedra and highlighted the important role that unions play in serving students:

Brown v. New York parent plaintiffs continue to fight for their day in court; supporters rally with them in support of fair funding Rochester court heard arguments about why the charter funding case should not be dismissed, as the state continues to try to have it thrown out; parents and supporters rallied before hearing

ADVISORY: September 7 - Critical Development in the Brown v. New York Lawsuit Rochester court will hear arguments about why the charter funding case should not be dismissed, as the state continues to try to have it thrown out; parents and supporters to gather for rally before court hearing

However, you have to have a very strong case that shows the future savings would outweigh the interest you'll pay in addition to the cost of the surgery before making the argument to take out a loan for cosmetic surgery.

In the motion, Navient laid out three arguments as to why the case should be thrown out including that the CFPB didn't establish rules defining what behaviors fell in the categories of unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices for student loan servicerIn the motion, Navient laid out three arguments as to why the case should be thrown out including that the CFPB didn't establish rules defining what behaviors fell in the categories of unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices for student loan servicerin the categories of unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices for student loan servicers.

Especially as the competition between national schools of abstract painting escalated, breaking out in arguments and even punches in the case of Kline and the French painter Jean Fautrier, it would follow that the internal competition within these national schools also intensified.27 This was certainly true on the French side at the Venice Biennale: in a very unusual move, two artists — Fautrier and Hans Hartung — were awarded Grand Prizes in painting, whereas normally only one was given, because the jury could not decide between the two contenders.28 Within the context of the politics internal to the movement of abstract expressionism, Meryon could thus be seen as a reassertion of Kline's original, breakthrough style as his own and thus a defence of his personal artistic identity, after Kline himself had turned to colour, around 1955, and left it up for grabs.

Remarkably, a circularity of argument is achieved within Munshi (rather than being demonstrated within the subject of Munshi's analysis) but detail of the Munshi analysis may be set out in a further Munshi self - published paper, although I will assume this is not the case.

In a jury civil case, the jury lay persons would weigh the evidence & theories and arguments, and I think they are okay in general in figuring things ouIn a jury civil case, the jury lay persons would weigh the evidence & theories and arguments, and I think they are okay in general in figuring things ouin general in figuring things ouin figuring things out.

Thus it seems to make little difference in this case if people are convinced out of trust / deference to a Milgrim - like authority figure, or because they understand the physical arguments.

And, as Matt Yglesias points out, one of Dubner and Levitt's arguments rests on the (demonstrably wrong and in any case wildly irrelevant) premise that solar panels are always black.

Here is Lucas, speaking at a recent debate held by the World Development Movement, setting out her case for carbon rationing, trading and «equality» and selling her argument for «equality» in such (pseudo) scientific terms.

The cases may well follow the pattern that played out after EPA's «endangerment» finding, motor vehicles rule, and new source review rules: More than 100 lawsuits were filed, but all were brought together for joint argument in court.

The way it was actually used by the Penn State con artist was intended to create a misleading graph, but with a defensible, if strained, argument to defend it in case the cat got out of the bag, which it did.

Mistakes can be made and should be allowed to be corrected in a timely manner once pointed out, yet I see no evidence of that in this case — please point out the corrective NSF press release and media conference if I have missed it, and I will be happy to drop this line of argument.

In this case the simplification doesn't appear to have helped Harry, who can only recognize his argument the way he worked it out originally, the hard way, with a big table.

Miskolczi's argument (I think) is that CAGW proponents have to be out to lunch if they can believe water vapor is a negative temperature feedback EXCEPT when temperature rise is caused by CO2, in which case it magically becomes a positive feedback.

[Hansen is talking about the possibility under certain circumstances and has specific arguments as to why the current case may be different from what the earth has experienced in the past, so let's leave him out of this.]

The oral arguments won't be heard until February 10th, so it will be after that date that we find out where this case could take e-waste recycling in the US.

If the author is already peddling denialism based on limited facts used out of context, and this new paper is published likely just to be used as the latest red herring distraction in the global warming argument by examining «Svalbard and Greenland temperature records» in a too limited time span without relevant context, which, just in case some may not have noticed does not represent the region known as planet Earth, uses too short a time span in relation to mechanism outside of the examined region because it is in fact a regional analysis; one is left with a reasonable conclusion that the paper is designed to be precisely what I suspect it is designed for, to be a red herring distraction in the argument between science and science denialism regarding global warming.

I admit that going into Eradicating Ecocide I was inclined to agree with Higgins — part out of personal inclination and part because nearly a year ago Polly and I sat down in Copenhagen for coffee to discuss the topic and she made a compelling case then — but just in the 200 pages presented here she does a great job examining both the historical situation which gave rise to corporate personhood and early attempts to stop pollution, more modern examples (many of which have been be well documented on TreeHugger, they being so current), and makes a good moral and logical argument that the only way we are going to truly stop ecocide is to make it a serious crime.

I agree with these base observations, and as I pointed out during argument, the same point can be made in the case of a record suspension.

In light of the Taricco saga, I hope that in each case the final arbiter will turn out to be the one who presents more convincing argumentIn light of the Taricco saga, I hope that in each case the final arbiter will turn out to be the one who presents more convincing argumentin each case the final arbiter will turn out to be the one who presents more convincing arguments.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinioCases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opiniocases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

Special preparation techniques before going to trial Before going to trial, the personal injury lawyers at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. like to invest extra time and money in the planning stages of any kind of personal injury claim, including vaginal mesh claims when necessary, and this is why we make use of mock juries and mock trials o help us test out different lines of arguments before using them for real in your case.

The judge rejected Morris» argument that the defamatory statements were clearly set out in the website postings, holding that «it is not the role of the Court to parse the impugned articles and blogs... to attempt to determine, by divination or divine inspiration, which statements it should assess in determining whether a prima facie case has been established.»

The House saw «no reason in law or logic why, leaving aside... the extreme cases of outright dismissal or walk - out, a contract of employment should be on any different footing from any other contract as regards the principle that «an unaccepted repudiation is a thing writ in water...»» The argument that the employee impliedly accepted the repudiation by working on under protest was rejected.

-- Second, in my view the study would have gained from fleshing out in greater detail some of the key cases with a more detailed treatment of the competing arguments in order to add not just colour to the text but also to allow a deeper understanding of the issues — at least for the reader.

For instance, what about the obligation to scream out, «Fore!!!??» The AP reports that tomorrow, the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in the case of two doctors who were playing golf together.

By yesterday morning, in fact, Mr. Bush's arguments for keeping Mr. Libby out of prison had become an unexpected gift to defense lawyers around the country, who scrambled to make use of them in their own cases....