Sentences with phrase «arguments in the case earlier»

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral arguments in the case earlier this month.

Not exact matches

With their large populations and rapid growth, these countries, so the argument goes, will soon become some of the largest economies in the world — and, in the case of China, the largest of all by as early as 2020.

That is the argument even more forcefully developed in Veritatis Splendor, an earlier encyclical that makes the case that, when freedom is untethered from truth, the very foundation of freedom is destroyed.

There were a few voices in the late sixties and early seventies who spoke of the importance of this cardinal principle (Faith Magazine, for example) and the consequences of overturning it but for very many laity and clergy it was the «hard case» argument that won.

In a more recent work, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier worIn a more recent work, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier worin the Balance: The Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier worin Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier worin the earlier work.

Robinson, in his address as outgoing president of the Society of Biblical Literature in December 1981, presented a detailed case for the argument that the earliest resurrection traditions were luminous appearances of Jesus, while stories of physical resurrection were secondary.

And we suspect that the argument from canon to date would in any case be indecisive, since there is late and relatively early material in all three divisions.

A department spokesperson said: «The government believes that some very strong and persuasive arguments have been put forward for cases where, perhaps because the child is suffering from a terminal illness at a very early age, the current consent requirements in the bill are not appropriate and should be revised.»

The government's lawyers are due to lay out their argument in more detail tomorrow but at an initial hearing earlier this month, they claimed that a first tier tribunal only has the power to identify that legislation is incompatible with the Human Rights Act - not to rule on a case on that basis.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, who earlier had ruled against the National Institutes of Health, this time came down on NIH's side in several key arguments in the case.

I drew on the book heavily in a post earlier this year to make the case that those calling themselves «climate skeptics» are not making good faith arguments.

He represented districts attempting to reform Michigan's school finance as early as the late 1960's, and his work inspired legal arguments used in equity cases elsewhere in the nation...

In the early 1980s it was not yet obvious how neoliberals would make use of the economic crisis in impoverished communities — and the argument that school failure was the leading cause of economic misery — to make their case for a radical transformation and privatization of public educatioIn the early 1980s it was not yet obvious how neoliberals would make use of the economic crisis in impoverished communities — and the argument that school failure was the leading cause of economic misery — to make their case for a radical transformation and privatization of public educatioin impoverished communities — and the argument that school failure was the leading cause of economic misery — to make their case for a radical transformation and privatization of public education.

Closing arguments in the case against Noel Rios, an early - release felon with a history of violent crimes, begin today at 10:30 a.m..

Many of today's investors swear by it not because they have considered the theoretical arguments pro and con and been convinced by the pro case but because they made money during the bull and attributed those gains not to the fact that stocks were priced well early in the bull market but to the fact that they were following a Buy - and - Hold strategy at the time.

I drew on the book heavily in a post earlier this year to make the case that those calling themselves «climate skeptics» are not making good faith arguments.

But the widely held expectation among those close to the case is that oral arguments will take place in the fall and a decision is expected early next year.

I admit that going into Eradicating Ecocide I was inclined to agree with Higgins — part out of personal inclination and part because nearly a year ago Polly and I sat down in Copenhagen for coffee to discuss the topic and she made a compelling case then — but just in the 200 pages presented here she does a great job examining both the historical situation which gave rise to corporate personhood and early attempts to stop pollution, more modern examples (many of which have been be well documented on TreeHugger, they being so current), and makes a good moral and logical argument that the only way we are going to truly stop ecocide is to make it a serious crime.

In Carter, the plaintiffs expressly take up the earlier case's unfinished arguments.

For example, I've seen several instances in which lawyers base legal arguments primarily on recent case law located from electronic databases or from judicial consideration of current statute only, without reference to earlier versions of the same provisions.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case -LSB-...]

But, the BC Supreme Court dismissed her case, in part because she had not raised her Charter argument at an earlier stage of the administrative process.

West Coast LEAF and the Community Legal Assistance Society (CLAS) were jointly granted leave to intervene in Denton v British Columbia, a case that addresses whether a claimant who was denied workers compensation benefits is barred from challenging that denial on equality grounds under the Charter because she did not raise the argument at an earlier stage of her case.

Earlier this week, the Supreme Court of Canada heard argument in an Alberta case involving the interplay between federal and provincial legislation providing for the compensation of workers injured in workplace activities.

[12] The thrust of the applicant's argument is that previous cases, which held printers liable for the contents of the material they printed, were based on the fact that in earlier times printers necessarily had contact with the subject material.

In this case for example, one might suggest Justice Manderscheid ought to have been more intrusive in his review and given stronger consideration to ATB's argument that the Commissioner erred in law by failing to follow the earlier interpretations set out by a previous FOIP CommissioneIn this case for example, one might suggest Justice Manderscheid ought to have been more intrusive in his review and given stronger consideration to ATB's argument that the Commissioner erred in law by failing to follow the earlier interpretations set out by a previous FOIP Commissionein his review and given stronger consideration to ATB's argument that the Commissioner erred in law by failing to follow the earlier interpretations set out by a previous FOIP Commissionein law by failing to follow the earlier interpretations set out by a previous FOIP Commissioner.

The court issued a one - page order withdrawing its earlier ruling and saying that the case will be scheduled for a new round of oral arguments «in due course.»

For those wishing my arguments in favour of recognizing such a cause of action, consider my earlier post: Tort Damages Place in Wrongful Dismissal Cases especially under the heading «Why tort damages are necessary and why you have to prove them.»

In rejecting the employer's arguments the judge, at paragraph 59, distinguished the case from earlier caselaw that had found in favor of the defendant employers, writinIn rejecting the employer's arguments the judge, at paragraph 59, distinguished the case from earlier caselaw that had found in favor of the defendant employers, writinin favor of the defendant employers, writing:

In this case, having a Phoenix construction accident attorney on your team is essential because they already know all the aspects of your case and make sure that their argument is backed up by the witnesses that were called in earlier proceedingIn this case, having a Phoenix construction accident attorney on your team is essential because they already know all the aspects of your case and make sure that their argument is backed up by the witnesses that were called in earlier proceedingin earlier proceedings.

Earlier this week, we explored the topic: «Why HR Needs to Speed Up on Social Media Adoption» focusing on the compelling arguments in the business case for social media adoption.