Sentences with phrase «arguments in the case last»

A federal judge heard arguments in the case last week and said he would decide this week whether to issue a permanent injunction against Ohio State, allowing Entine and her 8 - year - old Cavalier King Charles spaniel to stay at the sorority house.

Not exact matches

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important pair of cases, namely Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius.

At the Center for Law and Religion Forum, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a podcast on last week's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the Contraception Mandate case.

John Eppstein, writing The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations between the World Wars, argues that proportionality and last resort are to be found in the arguments of the Neoscholastics, but the texts he cites do not clearly make the case.

While this last argument has a distinguished pedigree, Stark puts the case in boldest terms: «All that 18th - century philosophizing on things like individualism and liberty was coming straight out of 1,800 years of Christianity.»

Just last December, in the Artavia case, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights announced a new human right to subsidized in vitro fertilization, pushing aside arguments that IVF may be dangerous to women and to the children born thereby.

In any case terrible judging, you could make an argument for Manhoef winning every round and the last two weren't even really close.

After the 2nd Circuit ruled last week, the three - judge panel hearing the appeal in the Skelos case asked lawyers to submit additional legal arguments in light of the Silver decision.

The seven - member Court of Appeals heard oral arguments yesterday in two cases where a midlevel appellate court unanimously concluded last year that state oil and gas law doesn't trump the authority of local governments to control land use.

Last week, the petitioners, which also include the Legal Aid Society, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the New York Civil Liberties Union, submitted a motion for preference to the appellate court, asking that arguments in the case be heard by the end of June.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week heard arguments in a case that is the latest challenge to one of the ways teachers» unions amass their political war chests.

The court rejected the school district's argument that the prayer meetings were an extension of the voluntary, «open forum» prayer meetings upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court last December in a higher - education case, Widmar v. Vincent.

In fact, Nevada's Supreme Court just heard arguments last month in a case involving that state's new law, which would allow every child attending a public school in the state to apply for an education savings accounIn fact, Nevada's Supreme Court just heard arguments last month in a case involving that state's new law, which would allow every child attending a public school in the state to apply for an education savings accounin a case involving that state's new law, which would allow every child attending a public school in the state to apply for an education savings accounin the state to apply for an education savings account.

Steve Morrison's voice shook with the weight of South Carolina's history as he closed his arguments against the state last month in the key trial of an 11 - year - old school finance case.

The high court last week heard arguments in the case, a challenge to the constitutionality of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998.

Washington — The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments last week in a case that could both define the rights of school boards to judge the «educational appropriateness» of books and further define the First Amendment rights of students.

Plaintiffs» closing arguments PowerPoint, presented in court on the last day of the Vergara v. California, sums up what's at issue and what's at stake in the historic education equality case.

Several Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court asked last week whether federal - court supervision of the Kansas City, Mo., school district has gone too far as the Court heard oral arguments in a major school - desegregation case.

Last week a panel of judges heard arguments in the state's appeal, and we pushed hard to show how critical it is that this case moves forward, and that these families have their day in court.

Lawyers from both sides in Vergara v California — the state's most significant teacher rights case in two decades — unleashed their final arguments today, in a last attempt to amplify their own case and destroy their opponent's.

Separately, last week Barnes & Noble (s BKS) and the American Booksellers Association requested permission to file an amici curiae, or «friend of the court,» brief in the case, saying that «if the Court were not to permit ABA and Barnes & Noble to serve as amici in this matter, it is likely that DOJ's numerous arguments in that filing that are specifically directed against Barnes & Noble and ABA, complete with their factual inaccuracies, would go unrebutted by any party currently before the Court.»

Update: Non-economic Damages Case for Pet Death Last week, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Medlen v. StricklCase for Pet Death Last week, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Medlen v. Stricklcase of Medlen v. Strickland.

«Over the last couple of years, we have had a lot of reactions from people who have closely followed the case and are looking to take up this argument in their own countries.»

I will confess that I was initially baffled by this post, for it was my prejudice that the general increase in OHC over the last ~ 50 years leaves so little room for benign warming due to some internal variability, that is I failed initially to see what case had to be answered and hence I failed to comprehend your argument.

In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ of mandamus was rejected in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People.In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ of mandamus was rejected in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People.in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People.in the Juliana case, and in The People.in The People...

Oral arguments were heard last month in the case, which is a battle to see who has jurisdiction over demand response in wholesale markets.

The number of reported cases where businesses used the Human Rights Act to bolster their argument rose by 15 % last year, from 39 cases in 2011 to 45 cases in 2012, according to figures provided by Sweet & Maxwell.

In a case that lasts only 10 to 15 minutes, the client should also lead with their strongest argument, not look for a «big finish» to their case.

When longtime courtroom sketch artist William J. Hennessy Jr. showed up last week at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, supplies in hand, to capture oral arguments in a high - profile Guantanamo detainee case, the court's chief deputy clerk stopped him short.

That kind of argument can be successful only if it challenges the General Court's findings of fact in paragraph 170 of the judgment under appeal, to the effect that «[t] he «last interested person» in the transparent and open tendering procedure in this case was candidate 4.

The last time the court scheduled an oral argument in September was to decide the constitutionality of the McCain - Feingold Act in the McConnell case.

The savvy and effective lawyer is the one who reads her morning case alert emails, took a CLE on effective oral arguments the week before, and looked up all the statutes in the complaint she just got from her client just to make sure that nothing has changed since the last time she read those very same statutes.

Then - Judge Roberts noted the number of questions asked in the first and last cases of each of the seven argument sessions in the Supreme Court's 1980 Term and the first and last cases in each of the seven argument sessions in the 2003 Term.

The full version of the report — which was available via Hulu.com last week but has since been withdrawn — discloses that NBC gave the story only five minutes — an eternity now, but not remarkable for a major story of the day in 1979 — before moving on to a report on that day's argument in the U.S. Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. Weber:

The ruling in the high - profile «Heyday» case, last September, held the default retirement age to be lawful, although the judge, Mr Justice Blake, observed that there was a «compelling» argument for the age to be raised beyond 65.