Sentences with phrase «arguments in the case next»

The Ohio Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case next week.

Not exact matches

Next week, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in NIFLA vs. Becerra, a case challenging current laws that force pro-life pregnancy centers to offer abortion info.

Next Monday, March 24 — the day before oral arguments in the Hobby Lobby andConestoga Wood Products cases — the Religious Freedom Project at Georgetown University's Berkley Center will host an event, «Everybody's Business: The Legal, Economic, and Political Implications of....

Meyers Leonard's frame and Tyler Zeller's polish offer solid arguments for either to fill the Bucks» gaping need for a center, Perry Jones» tremendous talents deserve consideration regardless of the frustration that comes with them, and an athletic shooter like Terrence Ross would offer cover in case the Bucks come to their senses and deal Monta Ellis before he can become a free agent next summer.

The 9th circuit will probably hold an oral argument in this case in the next few months.

The ad, entitled «Opportunity,» is pretty straight forward, hewing to the «rich vs. everyone else» argument employed to date by supporters of the Assembly Democrats» plan to continue taxing the state's wealthiest residents (in this case, actual millionaires and not simply those who earn $ 200,000 or more) at a higher rate for at least the next year.

Caproni said if the schedule held, it was possible that closing arguments in the case could be delivered as soon as the end of next week.

A new argument has just been added to the growing case for graphene being bumped off its pedestal as the next big thing in the high - tech world by the two - dimensional semiconductors known as MX2 materials.

The Justices said they would hear arguments in the railroad case next fall in tandem with arguments in National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab (Case No. 86 - 1879), a suit involving a drug - test requirement for Treasury Department employcase next fall in tandem with arguments in National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab (Case No. 86 - 1879), a suit involving a drug - test requirement for Treasury Department employCase No. 86 - 1879), a suit involving a drug - test requirement for Treasury Department employees.

As defendants in the Vergara trial were asking the court to dismiss the case, attorneys for the state's two biggest teachers union met with reporters outside the courthouse to offer a preview of arguments they intend to make if the judge denies their request, and the trial resumes next month with witnesses for the defense.

But the widely held expectation among those close to the case is that oral arguments will take place in the fall and a decision is expected early next year.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinioCases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opiniocases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

As of May 10, the Court had agreed to hear only 13 cases next Term (because of multiples in two grants, that will result in only 11 hours of argument).

The court will also hear arguments next week in a case attacking eBay, the global marketplace.»

Yet another issue will be on display during oral arguments at the Supreme Court next week: whether indigent defendants in capital cases must prove they need more experienced lawyers and resources before they will be provided.

Rather like the stages of growing up, each phase of life has its pros and cons, but each stage also promises the opportunity to move to the next stage, in this case, the new wave of legal tech really becoming widespread because the economic case and ROI argument has been won and the partners of law firms, and the GCs in the corporates, will then fully believe in its value.

CCLA's advocacy efforts continue to challenge these developments: next year we will make arguments in R. v. Nur and R. v. Smickle, two appellate cases that are bringing constitutional challenges to mandatory minimum sentences.

Next week, the Quebec Court of Appeal will hear argument in the Gun Registry Destruction case: Québec (Procureur général) c. Canada (Procureur général), 2012 QCCS 4202 (unofficial English translation of the first - instance decision).

Next Thursday, the Florida Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a big Florida foreclosure defense case — so big, in fact, that lots of banks are complaining to the news media that there will be a huge state - wide financial crisis if the Florida Supreme Court sides with the Average Joe citizen who's fighting this -LSB-...]